Tag Archives: cryptographic sovereignty

Sovereign Passwordless Authentication — Quantum-Resilient Security

Corporate visual showing sovereign passwordless authentication and RAM-only quantum-resistant cryptology by Freemindtronic

Quantum-Resilient Sovereign Passwordless Authentication stands as a core doctrine of modern cybersecurity. Far beyond the FIDO model, this approach restores full control of digital identity by eliminating reliance on clouds, servers, or identity federations. Designed to operate offline, it relies on proof-of-possession, volatile-memory execution (RAM-only), and segmented AES-256-CBC / PGP encryption, ensuring universal non-persistent authentication. Originating from Freemindtronic Andorra 🇦🇩, this architecture redefines the concept of passwordless through a sovereign, scientific lens aligned with NIST SP 800-63B, Microsoft, and ISO/IEC 29115 frameworks. This article explores its foundations, doctrinal differences from federated models, and its role in building truly sovereign cybersecurity.

Executive Summary — Foundations of the Sovereign Passwordless Authentication Model

Quick read (≈ 4 min): The term passwordless, often linked to the FIDO standard, actually refers to a family of authentication models — only a few of which ensure true sovereignty. The offline sovereign model designed by Freemindtronic Andorra 🇦🇩 eliminates any network or cloud dependency and is built upon proof-of-possession and volatile-memory operations.

This approach represents a doctrinal shift: it redefines digital identity through RAM-only cryptology, AES-256-CBC encryption, and PGP segmentation with zero persistence.
By removing all centralisation, this model enables universal, offline, and quantum-resilient authentication — fully aligned with NIST, Microsoft, and ISO/IEC frameworks.

⚙ A Sovereign Model in Action

Sovereign architectures fundamentally diverge from FIDO and OAuth models.
Where those rely on registration servers and identity federators, PassCypher HSM and PassCypher NFC HSM operate in complete air-gap isolation.
All critical operations — key generation, signing, verification, and destruction — occur exclusively in volatile memory.
This offline passwordless authentication demonstrates that cryptologic sovereignty can be achieved without depending on any third-party infrastructure.

🌍 Universal Scope

The sovereign passwordless model applies to all environments — industrial, military, healthcare, or defence.
It outlines a neutral, independent, and interoperable digital doctrine capable of protecting digital identities beyond FIDO or WebAuthn standards.

Reading Parameters

Quick summary reading time: ≈ 4 minutes
Advanced summary reading time: ≈ 6 minutes
Full article reading time: ≈ 35 minutes
Publication date: 2025-11-04
Last update: 2025-11-04
Complexity level: Expert — Cryptology & Sovereignty
Technical density: ≈ 78 %
Languages available: FR · EN
Specificity: Doctrinal analysis — Passwordless models, digital sovereignty
Reading order: Summary → Definitions → Doctrine → Architecture → Impacts
Accessibility: Screen-reader optimised — anchors & semantic tags
Editorial type: Cyberculture Chronicle — Doctrine & Sovereignty
Strategic significance: 8.3 / 10 normative and strategic scope
About the author: Jacques Gascuel, inventor and founder of Freemindtronic Andorra, expert in HSM architectures, cryptographic sovereignty, and offline security.

Editorial Note — This article will be progressively enriched in line with the international standardization of sovereign passwordless models and ongoing ISO/NIST developments related to offline authentication. This content is authored in accordance with the AI Transparency Declaration issued by Freemindtronic Andorra FM-AI-2025-11-SMD5

Sovereign Localisation (Offline)

PassCypher HSM and PassCypher NFC HSM devices embed 14 languages offline with no internet connection required.
This design guarantees linguistic confidentiality and technical neutrality in any air-gapped environment.

2025 Cyberculture Cybersecurity Digital Security

CryptPeer messagerie P2P WebRTC : appels directs chiffrés de bout en bout

2026 Awards Cyberculture Digital Security Distinction Excellence EviOTP NFC HSM Technology EviPass EviPass NFC HSM technology EviPass Technology finalists PassCypher PassCypher

Quantum-Resistant Passwordless Manager — PassCypher finalist, Intersec Awards 2026 (FIDO-free, RAM-only)

2025 Cyberculture Digital Security

Authentification multifacteur : anatomie, OTP, risques

2024 Cyberculture Digital Security

Russian Cyberattack Microsoft: An Unprecedented Threat

2025 Cyberculture

NGOs Legal UN Recognition

2025 Cyberculture Legal information

French IT Liability Case: A Landmark in IT Accountability

2024 Articles Cyberculture Legal information

ANSSI Cryptography Authorization: Complete Declaration Guide

2021 Cyberculture Digital Security Phishing

Phishing Cyber victims caught between the hammer and the anvil

2024 Cyberculture DataShielder

Google Workspace Data Security: Legal Insights

2024 Articles Cyberculture legal Legal information News

End-to-End Messaging Encryption Regulation – A European Issue

Articles Contactless passwordless Cyberculture EviOTP NFC HSM Technology EviPass NFC HSM technology multi-factor authentication Passwordless MFA

How to choose the best multi-factor authentication method for your online security

2024 Cyberculture Digital Security News Training

Andorra National Cyberattack Simulation: A Global First in Cyber Defense

Articles Cyberculture Digital Security Technical News

Protect Meta Account Identity Theft with EviPass and EviOTP

2024 Articles Cyberculture EviPass Password

Human Limitations in Strong Passwords Creation

2023 Articles Cyberculture EviCypher NFC HSM News Technologies

Telegram and the Information War in Ukraine

Articles Cyberculture EviCore NFC HSM Technology EviCypher NFC HSM EviCypher Technology

Communication Vulnerabilities 2023: Avoiding Cyber Threats

Articles Cyberculture NFC HSM technology Technical News

RSA Encryption: How the Marvin Attack Exposes a 25-Year-Old Flaw

2023 Articles Cyberculture Digital Security Technical News

Strong Passwords in the Quantum Computing Era

2023 Articles Cyberculture EviCore HSM OpenPGP Technology EviCore NFC HSM Browser Extension EviCore NFC HSM Technology Legal information Licences Freemindtronic

Unitary patent system: why some EU countries are not on board

2024 Crypto Currency Cryptocurrency Cyberculture Legal information

EU Sanctions Cryptocurrency Regulation: A Comprehensive Overview

2023 Articles Cyberculture Eco-friendly Electronics GreenTech Technologies

The first wood transistor for green electronics

2018 Articles Cyberculture Legal information News

Why does the Freemindtronic hardware wallet comply with the law?

2023 Articles Cyberculture Technologies

NRE Cost Optimization for Electronics: A Comprehensive Guide

The articles displayed above ↑ belong to the same editorial section Cyberculture — Doctrine and Sovereignty.
They extend the reflection on RAM-only cryptology, digital sovereignty, and the evolution toward passwordless authentication.
Each article deepens the doctrinal, technical, and regulatory foundations of sovereign cybersecurity as defined by the Freemindtronic Andorra model.

Advanced Summary — Doctrine and Strategic Scope of the Sovereign Passwordless Model

The sovereign passwordless authentication model is not a mere technological evolution but a doctrinal shift in how digital identity is authenticated.
While dominant standards such as FIDO2, WebAuthn, or OAuth rely on servers, identity federations, and cloud infrastructures, the sovereign model promotes controlled disconnection, volatile-memory execution, and proof-of-possession without persistence.
This approach reverses the traditional trust paradigm — transferring authentication legitimacy from the network to the user.

↪ A Threefold Doctrinal Distinction

Three major families now coexist within the passwordless ecosystem:

  • Cloud passwordless (e.g., Microsoft, Google) — Dependent on a server account, convenient but non-sovereign;
  • Federated passwordless (OAuth / OpenID Connect) — Centralised around a third-party identity provider, prone to data correlation;
  • Offline sovereign (PassCypher, NFC HSM) — Local execution, physical proof, complete absence of persistence.

↪ Strategic Foundation

By eliminating dependency on remote infrastructures, the sovereign passwordless model strengthens structural quantum resilience and ensures the geopolitical neutrality of critical systems.
It naturally aligns with regulatory frameworks such as GDPR, NIS2, and DORA, all of which require full control over identity data and cryptographic secrets.

⮞ Summary — Doctrine and Reach

  • The sovereign passwordless model removes both passwords and external dependencies.
  • It is based on proof-of-possession, embedded cryptology, and ephemeral memory.
  • It guarantees regulatory compliance and sovereign resilience against quantum threats.

↪ Geopolitical and Industrial Implications

This model provides a strategic advantage to organisations capable of operating outside cloud dependency.
For critical sectors — defence, energy, healthcare, and finance — it delivers unprecedented cryptologic autonomy and reduces exposure to transnational cyberthreats.
Freemindtronic Andorra 🇦🇩 exemplifies this transition through a European, neutral, and universal approach built around a fully offline, interoperable ecosystem.

✓ Applied Sovereignty

The RAM-only design and segmented encryption model (PGP + AES-256-CBC) form the foundation of a truly sovereign passwordless authentication.
Each session acts as a temporary cryptographic environment destroyed immediately after use.
This principle of absolute volatility prevents re-identification, interception, and post-execution compromise.

This Advanced Summary therefore marks the boundary between dependent passwordless authentication and true digital sovereignty.
The next section will outline the cryptographic foundations of this doctrine, illustrated through PassCypher HSM and PassCypher NFC HSM technologies.

[/ux_text]

Cryptographic Foundations of the Sovereign Passwordless Model

The sovereign passwordless authentication model is grounded in precise cryptographic principles engineered to operate without any network dependency or data persistence.
It merges the robustness of classical cryptology (PKI, AES) with modern RAM-only architectures to guarantee a truly independent passwordless authentication.
These three technical pillars sustain the coherence of a quantum-resilient system — achieved not through post-quantum algorithms (PQC), but through the structural absence of exploitable data.

🔹 Public Key Infrastructure (PKI)

The PKI (Public Key Infrastructure) remains the foundation of global digital trust, establishing a cryptographic link between identity and public key.
In the sovereign framework, this public key is never stored on a server; it is derived temporarily during a local challenge-response validated by a physical token.
This ephemeral derivation prevents replication, impersonation, or remote interception.
Its design aligns with international cryptographic frameworks including the NIST SP 800-63B (US), the ENISA standards (EU), Japan’s CRYPTREC recommendations, and China’s Cybersecurity Law and national encryption standards.

🔹 Local Biometrics

Local biometrics — fingerprint, facial, retinal, or voice recognition — reinforce proof-of-possession without transmitting any biometric model or image.
The sensor serves as a local trigger verifying user presence, while storing no persistent data.
This principle complies with major privacy and cybersecurity frameworks including GDPR (EU), CCPA (US), UK Data Protection Act, Japan’s APPI, and China’s PIPL and CSL laws on secure local data processing.

🔹 Embedded Cryptology and Segmented Architecture (RAM-only)

At its core, the sovereign passwordless model relies on embedded cryptology and segmented PGP encryption executed entirely in volatile memory.
In technologies such as PassCypher, each key is divided into independent fragments loaded exclusively in RAM at runtime.
These fragments are encrypted under a hybrid PGP + AES-256-CBC scheme, ensuring complete segregation of identities and secrets.

This dynamic segmentation prevents all persistence: once the session ends, all data is instantly destroyed.
The device leaves no exploitable trace, giving rise to a form of quantum resilience by design — not through algorithmic defence, but through the sheer absence of decryptable material.
This architecture also aligns with secure “air-gapped” operational environments widely adopted across defence, industrial, and financial infrastructures in the US, Europe, and Asia-Pacific.

⮞ Summary — Technical Foundations

  • Public keys are derived and validated locally, never persisted on remote servers.
  • Biometric verification operates offline, without storing models or identifiers.
  • Embedded RAM-only cryptology guarantees volatility and untraceability of secrets.
  • The system is quantum-resilient by design — not via PQC, but via absence of exploitable matter.

↪ Compliance and Independence

These principles ensure native compliance with global cybersecurity and privacy frameworks while maintaining full independence from proprietary standards.
Whereas FIDO-based architectures rely on persistence and synchronisation, the sovereign model establishes erasure as a security doctrine.
This approach introduces a new paradigm: zero persistence as the cornerstone of digital trust.

The next section presents the PassCypher case study — the first internationally recognised sovereign implementation of these cryptographic foundations, certified for RAM-only operation and structural quantum resilience across EU, US, and Asia-Pacific frameworks.

PassCypher — The Sovereign Passwordless Authentication Model

PassCypher, developed by Freemindtronic Andorra 🇦🇩, represents the first tangible implementation of the sovereign passwordless authentication model.
This technology, an official finalist at the Intersec Awards 2026 in Dubai, marks a major doctrinal milestone in global cybersecurity.
It demonstrates that universal, offline, RAM-only authentication can deliver structural resilience to quantum threats.

The international Intersec jury described the innovation as:

“Offline passwordless security resistant to quantum attacks.”

This recognition celebrates not only a product, but a sovereign engineering philosophy
a model where trust is localised, secrets are volatile, and validation depends on no external server.
Each session executes entirely in volatile memory (RAM-only), each key is fragmented and encrypted, and every identity is based on a physical proof-of-possession.

↪ RAM-only Architecture and Operation

Within PassCypher, PGP keys are divided into independent fragments, encrypted via a hybrid AES-256-CBC + PGP algorithm, and loaded temporarily into memory during execution.
When the session ends, fragments are erased instantly, leaving no exploitable trace.
No data is ever written, synchronised, or exported — rendering the system tamper-proof by design and quantum-resilient through non-persistence.

↪ Integration into Critical Environments

Compatible with Zero Trust and air-gapped infrastructures, PassCypher operates without servers, browser extensions, or identity federations.
It meets the compliance expectations of critical sectors — defence, healthcare, finance, and energy — by aligning with GDPR (EU), NIS2, DORA, CCPA (US), and APPI (Japan) frameworks while avoiding any externalisation of identity data.
This sovereign authentication approach guarantees total independence from cloud ecosystems and digital superpowers.

⮞ Summary — PassCypher Doctrine

  • RAM-only: all cryptographic operations occur in volatile memory, without storage.
  • Proof of possession: local validation using a physical NFC or HSM key.
  • Zero persistence: automatic erasure after each session.
  • Quantum-resilient: structural resilience without post-quantum algorithms (PQC).
  • Universal interoperability: works across all systems, independent of cloud services.

↪ Applied Sovereign Doctrine

PassCypher materialises a security-by-erasure philosophy.
By eliminating the very concept of a password, it replaces stored secrets with an ephemeral proof-of-possession.
This paradigm shift redefines digital sovereignty: trust no longer resides in a server, but in local, verifiable, and non-persistent execution.

Strategic Impact

The recognition of PassCypher at the Intersec Awards 2026 positions Freemindtronic Andorra 🇦🇩 at the forefront of the global transition toward sovereign authentication.
This neutral, interoperable model paves the way for an international standard built on controlled disconnection, embedded cryptology, and structural resilience to quantum threats.

The next section introduces an Enhanced Sovereign Glossary to standardise the technical terminology of the passwordless model — from proof-of-possession to quantum-resilient architecture.

Weaknesses of FIDO / Passkey Systems — Limits and Attack Vectors

The FIDO / passkey protocols represent significant progress in reducing password dependence.
However, and this must be clearly stated, they do not eliminate all vulnerabilities.
Several operational and tactical vectors persist — WebAuthn interception, OAuth persistence, clickjacking via extensions — all of which undermine sovereignty and non-traceability.
It is therefore essential to expose the known weaknesses and, in parallel, highlight sovereign counter-approaches that offer greater structural resilience.

⮞ Observed Weaknesses — Weak Signals within FIDO / WebAuthn Systems

Vulnerabilities of Federated Systems — Sovereign Mitigations

The table below summarises the main vulnerabilities observed in federated authentication systems (OAuth, WebAuthn, extensions) and the mitigation strategies proposed by sovereign RAM-only models.

Vulnerability Impact Exploitation Scenario Sovereign Mitigation
OAuth / 2FA Persistence Session hijacking, prolonged exposure Tokens stored in cloud/client reused by attacker Avoid persistence — use ephemeral RAM-only credentials and local proof-of-possession
WebAuthn Interception Authentication hijack, impersonation Man-in-the-browser / hijacking of registration or auth flow Remove WebAuthn dependency for sovereign contexts — local cryptographic challenge in volatile memory
Extension Clickjacking User action exfiltration, fake prompts Compromised browser extension simulates authentication UI Disable sensitive extensions — prefer hardware validation (NFC / HSM) and absence of browser-based UX
Metadata & Traceability Identity correlation, privacy leaks Identity federation produces exploitable logs and metadata Zero-leakage: no server registry, no sync, key segmentation in volatile memory

⮞ Summary — Why Sovereign Models Mitigate These Weaknesses

RAM-only architectures eliminate exploitation vectors linked to persistence, identity federation, and web interfaces.
They prioritise local proof-of-possession, embedded cryptology, and volatile-memory execution to ensure structural resilience.

⮞ Summary — Why FIDO Alone Is Not Enough for Sovereignty

  • FIDO improves UX-level security but often retains infrastructure dependency (servers, synchronisation).
  • Integration-chain attacks (extensions, OAuth flows, WebAuthn) reveal that the surface remains significant.
  • True sovereignty requires complementary principles: RAM-only execution, physical proof, zero persistence, and local cryptology.

✓ Recommended Sovereign Countermeasures

  • Adopt physical, non-exportable authenticators (NFC / HSM) validated locally.
  • Use ephemeral-first schemes: derivation → use → destruction in RAM.
  • Avoid any cloud synchronisation or storage of keys and metadata.
  • Strictly restrict and audit extensions and client components; prefer hardware UX validation.
  • Document and monitor weak signals (e.g., Tycoon 2FA, DEF CON findings) to adapt security policies.

In summary, while FIDO and passkeys remain valuable for mainstream security, they are insufficient to guarantee digital sovereignty.
For critical contexts, the sovereign alternative — built on local proof-of-possession and volatility — reduces the attack surface and eliminates exfiltration paths tied to cloud and federated systems.

The next section introduces an Enhanced Sovereign Glossary to unify the technical and operational terminology of this doctrine.

FIDO vs TOTP / HOTP — Two Authentication Philosophies

The debate between FIDO and TOTP/HOTP systems illustrates two radically different visions of digital trust.
On one side, FIDO promotes a federated, cloud-centric model based on public/private key pairs tied to identity servers.
On the other, TOTP and HOTP protocols — though older — represent a decentralised and local approach, conceptually closer to the sovereign paradigm.

Doctrinal Comparison — FIDO2 vs TOTP vs RAM-only

The following table highlights the core doctrinal and technical differences between FIDO2/WebAuthn, TOTP/HOTP, and the sovereign RAM-only approach.
It reveals how each model defines trust, cryptologic dependency, and strategic sovereignty.

🔹 Quick Definitions

  • FIDO2 / WebAuthn — Modern authentication standard based on public/private key pairs, managed through a browser or hardware authenticator, requiring a registration server.
  • TOTP / HOTP — One-time password (OTP) protocols based on a locally shared secret and a synchronised computation (time or counter).

🔹 Core Doctrinal Differences

Criterion FIDO2 / WebAuthn TOTP / HOTP Sovereign Approach (RAM-only)
Architecture Server + identity federation (browser, cloud) Local + time/counter synchronisation Offline, no synchronisation, no server
Secret Public/private key pair registered on a server Shared secret between client and server Ephemeral secret generated and destroyed in RAM
Interoperability Limited to FIDO-compatible platforms Universal (RFC 6238 / RFC 4226) Universal (hardware + protocol-independent cryptology)
Network Resilience Dependent on registration service Operates without cloud Designed for air-gapped environments
Sovereignty Low — dependent on major ecosystems Medium — partial control of the secret Total — local autonomy, zero persistence
Quantum-Resistance Dependent on algorithms (non-structural) None — reusable secret Structural — nothing remains to decrypt post-execution

🔹 Strategic Reading

FIDO prioritises UX convenience and global standardisation, but introduces structural dependencies on cloud and identity federation.
OTP protocols (TOTP/HOTP), though dated, retain the advantage of operating offline without browser constraints.
The sovereign model combines the simplicity of OTPs with the cryptologic strength of RAM-only segmentation — it removes shared secrets, replaces them with ephemeral challenges, and guarantees a purely local proof-of-possession.

⮞ Summary — Comparative Doctrine

  • FIDO: centralised architecture, cloud dependency, simplified UX but limited sovereignty.
  • TOTP/HOTP: decentralised and compatible, but vulnerable if the shared secret is exposed.
  • Sovereign RAM-only: merges the best of both — proof-of-possession, non-persistence, zero dependency.

🔹 Perspective

From a digital sovereignty standpoint, the RAM-only model emerges as the conceptual successor to TOTP:
it maintains the simplicity of local computation while eliminating shared secrets and persistent keys.
This represents a doctrinal evolution toward an authentication model founded on possession and volatility — the twin pillars of truly autonomous cybersecurity.

SSH vs FIDO — Two Paradigms of Passwordless Authentication

The history of passwordless authentication did not begin with FIDO — it is rooted in SSH key-based authentication, which has secured critical infrastructures for over two decades.
Comparing SSH and FIDO/WebAuthn reveals two fundamentally different visions of digital sovereignty:
one open and decentralised, the other standardised and centralised.

🔹 SSH — The Ancestor of Sovereign Passwordless

The SSH (Secure Shell) protocol is based on asymmetric key pairs (public / private).
The user holds their private key locally, and identity is verified via a cryptographic challenge.
No password is exchanged or stored — making SSH inherently passwordless.
Moreover, SSH can operate offline during initial key establishment and does not depend on any third-party identity server.

🔹 FIDO — The Federated Passwordless

By contrast, FIDO2/WebAuthn introduces a normative authentication framework where the public key is registered with an authentication server.
While cryptographically sound, this model depends on a centralised infrastructure (browser, cloud, federation).
Thus, FIDO simplifies user experience but transfers trust to third parties (Google, Microsoft, Apple, etc.), thereby limiting sovereignty.

🔹 Doctrinal Comparison

Criterion SSH (Public/Private Key) FIDO2 / WebAuthn Sovereign RAM-only Model
Architecture Direct client/server, local key Federated server via browser Offline, no dependency
User Secret Local private key (non-exportable) Stored in a FIDO authenticator (YubiKey, TPM, etc.) Fragmented, ephemeral in RAM
Interoperability Universal (OpenSSH, RFC 4251) Limited (WebAuthn API, browser required) Universal, hardware-based (NFC / HSM)
Cloud Dependency None Often required (federation, sync) None
Resilience High — offline capable Moderate — depends on provider Structural — no persistent data
Sovereignty High — open-source model Low — dependent on private vendors Total — local proof-of-possession
Quantum-Resistance RSA/ECC vulnerable long term RSA/ECC vulnerable — vendor dependent Structural — nothing to decrypt post-execution

🔹 Doctrinal Analysis

SSH and FIDO represent two distinct doctrines of passwordless identity:

  • SSH: technical sovereignty, independence, simplicity — but lacking a unified UX standard.
  • FIDO: global usability and standardisation — but dependent on centralised infrastructures.

The RAM-only model introduced by PassCypher merges both philosophies:
it preserves the local proof-of-possession of SSH while introducing ephemeral volatility that eliminates all persistence — even within hardware.

⮞ Summary — SSH vs FIDO

  • SSH is historically the first sovereign passwordless model — local, open, and self-hosted.
  • FIDO establishes cloud-standardised passwordless authentication — convenient but non-autonomous.
  • The RAM-only model represents the doctrinal synthesis: local proof-of-possession + non-persistence = full sovereignty.

🔹 Perspective

The future of passwordless authentication extends beyond simply removing passwords:
it moves toward architectural neutrality — a model in which the secret is neither stored, nor transmitted, nor reusable.
The SSH of the 21st century may well be PassCypher RAM-only: a cryptology of possession — ephemeral, structural, and universal.

FIDO vs OAuth / OpenID — The Identity Federation Paradox

Both FIDO2/WebAuthn and OAuth/OpenID Connect share a common philosophy: delegating identity management to a trusted third party.
While this model improves convenience, it introduces a strong dependency on cloud identity infrastructures.
In contrast, the sovereign RAM-only model places trust directly in physical possession and local cryptology, removing all external identity intermediaries.

Criterion FIDO2 / WebAuthn OAuth / OpenID Connect Sovereign RAM-only
Identity Management Local registration server Federation via Identity Provider (IdP) No federation — local identity only
Persistence Public key stored on a server Persistent bearer tokens None — ephemeral derivation and RAM erasure
Interoperability Native via browser APIs Universal via REST APIs Universal via local cryptology
Risks Identity traceability Token reuse / replay No storage, no correlation possible
Sovereignty Limited (third-party server) Low (cloud federation) Total — offline, RAM-only execution

⮞ Summary — FIDO vs OAuth

  • Both models retain server dependency and identity traceability.
  • The sovereign model eliminates identity federation and persistence entirely.
  • It establishes local trust without intermediaries, ensuring complete sovereignty.

TPM vs HSM — The Hardware Trust Dilemma

Hardware sovereignty depends on where the key physically resides.
The TPM (Trusted Platform Module) is built into the motherboard and tied to the manufacturer, while the HSM (Hardware Security Module) is an external, portable, and isolated component.
The sovereign RAM-only model goes one step further by removing even HSM persistence: keys exist only temporarily in volatile memory.

Criterion TPM HSM Sovereign RAM-only
Location Fixed on motherboard External module (USB/NFC) Volatile — memory only
Vendor Dependency Manufacturer-dependent (Intel, AMD…) Independent, often FIPS-certified Fully independent — sovereign
Persistence Permanent internal storage Encrypted internal storage None — auto-erased after session
Portability Non-portable Portable Universal (NFC key / mobile / portable HSM)
Sovereignty Low Medium Total

⮞ Summary — TPM vs HSM

  • TPM depends on the hardware manufacturer and operating system.
  • HSM offers more independence but still maintains persistence.
  • The RAM-only model ensures total hardware sovereignty through ephemeral, non-persistent execution.

FIDO vs RAM-only — Cloud-free Is Not Offline

Many confuse cloud-free with offline.
A FIDO system may operate without the cloud, but it still depends on a registration server and a browser.
The RAM-only model, by contrast, executes and destroys the key directly in volatile memory: no data is stored, synchronised, or recoverable.

Criterion FIDO2 / WebAuthn Sovereign RAM-only
Server Dependency Yes — registration and synchronisation required No — 100% local operation
Persistence Public key persisted on server None — destroyed after execution
Interoperability Limited to WebAuthn Universal — any cryptologic protocol
Quantum Resilience Non-structural Structural — nothing to decrypt
Sovereignty Low Total

⮞ Summary — FIDO vs RAM-only

  • FIDO still depends on browsers and registration servers.
  • RAM-only removes all traces and dependencies.
  • It is the only truly offline and sovereign model.

Password Manager Cloud vs Offline HSM — The True Secret Challenge

Cloud-based password managers promise simplicity and synchronisation but centralise secrets and expose users to large-scale compromise risks.
The Offline HSM / RAM-only approach ensures that identity data never leaves the hardware environment.

Criterion Cloud Password Manager Offline HSM / RAM-only
Storage Encrypted cloud, persistent Volatile RAM, no persistence
Data Control Third-party server User only
Interoperability Proprietary apps Universal (key, NFC, HSM)
Attack Surface High (cloud, APIs, browser) Near-zero — full air-gap
Sovereignty Low Total

⮞ Summary — Cloud vs Offline HSM

  • Cloud models centralise secrets and create systemic dependency.
  • The HSM/RAM-only approach returns full control to the user.
  • Result: sovereignty, security, and GDPR/NIS2 compliance.

FIDO vs Zero Trust — Authentication and Sovereignty

The Zero Trust paradigm (NIST SP 800-207) enforces continuous verification but does not prescribe how authentication should occur.
FIDO partially meets these principles, while the sovereign RAM-only model fully embodies them:
never trust, never store.

Zero Trust Principle FIDO Implementation Sovereign RAM-only Implementation
Verify explicitly Server validates the FIDO key Local validation via proof-of-possession
Assume breach Persistent sessions Ephemeral sessions, RAM-only
Least privilege Cloud role-based access Key segmentation per use (micro-HSM)
Continuous validation Server-based session renewal Dynamic local proof, no persistence
Protect data everywhere Cloud-side encryption Local AES-256-CBC + PGP encryption

⮞ Summary — FIDO vs Zero Trust

  • FIDO partially aligns with Zero Trust principles.
  • The sovereign model fully realises them — with no cloud dependency.
  • Result: a cryptologic, sovereign, RAM-only Zero Trust architecture.

FIDO Is Not an Offline System — Scientific Distinction Between “Hardware Authenticator” and Sovereign HSM

The term “hardware” in the FIDO/WebAuthn framework is often misunderstood as implying full cryptographic autonomy.
In reality, a FIDO2 key performs local cryptographic operations but still depends on a software and server environment (browser, OS, identity provider) to initiate and validate authentication.
Without this software chain, the key is inert — no authentication, signing, or verification is possible.
It is therefore not a true air-gapped system but rather an “offline-assisted” one.

FIDO Model — Doctrinal Diagram

  • Remote server (Relying Party): generates and validates the cryptographic challenge.
  • Client (browser or OS): carries the challenge via the WebAuthn API.
  • Hardware authenticator (FIDO key): signs the challenge using its non-exportable private key.

Thus, even though the FIDO key is physical, it remains dependent on a client–server protocol.
This architecture excludes true cryptographic sovereignty — unlike EviCore sovereign NFC HSMs used by PassCypher.

Doctrinal Comparison — The Five Passwordless Authentication Models

To grasp the strategic reach of the sovereign model, it must be viewed across the full spectrum of passwordless architectures.
Five doctrines currently dominate the global landscape: FIDO2/WebAuthn, Federated OAuth, Hybrid Cloud, Industrial Air-Gap, and Sovereign RAM-only.
The table below outlines their structural differences.

Model Persistence Dependency Resilience Sovereignty
FIDO2 / WebAuthn Public key stored on server Federated server / browser Moderate (susceptible to WebAuthn exploits) Low (cloud-dependent)
Federated OAuth Persistent tokens Third-party identity provider Variable (provider-dependent) Limited
Hybrid Cloud Partial (local cache) Cloud API / IAM Moderate Medium
Industrial Air-gap None Isolated / manual High Strong
Sovereign RAM-only (Freemindtronic) None (zero persistence) Zero server dependency Structural — quantum-resilient Total — local proof-of-possession

⮞ Summary — Position of the Sovereign Model

The sovereign RAM-only model is the only one that eliminates persistence, server dependency, and identity federation.
It relies solely on physical proof-of-possession and embedded cryptology, ensuring complete sovereignty and structural quantum resilience.

FIDO vs PKI / Smartcard — Normative Heritage and Cryptographic Sovereignty

Before FIDO, PKI (Public Key Infrastructure) and Smartcards already formed the backbone of strong authentication.
Guided by standards such as ISO/IEC 29115 and NIST SP 800-63B, they relied on proof-of-possession and hierarchical public key management.
While FIDO2/WebAuthn sought to modernise this legacy by removing passwords, it did so at the cost of increased browser and server dependency.
The sovereign RAM-only model retains PKI’s cryptologic rigour but eliminates persistence and hierarchy: keys are derived, used, and erased — without external infrastructure.

Criterion PKI / Smartcard FIDO2 / WebAuthn Sovereign RAM-only
Core Principle Proof-of-possession via X.509 certificate Challenge-response via browser Offline physical proof, no hierarchy
Architecture Hierarchical (CA / RA) Client-server / browser Autonomous, fully local
Persistence Key stored on card Public key stored on server None — ephemeral in volatile memory
Interoperability ISO 7816, PKCS#11 WebAuthn / proprietary APIs Universal (PGP, AES, NFC, HSM)
Normative Compliance ISO 29115, NIST SP 800-63B Partial (WebAuthn, W3C) Structural — compliant with ISO/NIST frameworks without dependency
Sovereignty High (national cards) Low (FIDO vendors / cloud) Total (local, non-hierarchical, RAM-only)

↪ Heritage and Doctrinal Evolution

The RAM-only sovereign model does not reject PKI; it preserves its proof-of-possession principle while removing hierarchical dependency and persistent storage.
Where FIDO reinterprets PKI through the browser, the sovereign model transcends it — internalising cryptology, replacing hierarchy with local proof, and erasing stored secrets permanently.

⮞ Summary — FIDO vs PKI / Smartcard

  • PKI ensures trust through hierarchy, FIDO through browsers, and the sovereign model through direct possession.
  • RAM-only inherits ISO/NIST cryptographic discipline — but without servers, CAs, or persistence.
  • Result: a post-PKI authentication paradigm — universal, sovereign, and structurally quantum-resilient.

FIDO/WebAuthn vs Username + Password + TOTP — Security, Sovereignty & Resilience

To clarify the debate, this section compares FIDO/WebAuthn with the traditional username + password + TOTP schema, adding the sovereign RAM-only reference.
It evaluates phishing resistance, attack surface, cloud dependency, and execution speed — critical factors in high-security environments such as defence, healthcare, finance, and energy.

🔹 Quick Definitions

  • FIDO/WebAuthn: public-key authentication (client/server) reliant on browsers and registration servers.
  • ID + Password + TOTP: traditional model using static credentials and time-based OTP — simple but vulnerable to MITM and phishing.
  • Sovereign RAM-only (PassCypher HSM PGP): local proof-of-possession with ephemeral cryptology executed in volatile memory — no server, no cloud, no persistence.
Criterion FIDO2 / WebAuthn Username + Password + TOTP Sovereign RAM-only (PassCypher HSM PGP)
Phishing Resistance ✅ Origin-bound (phishing-resistant) ⚠️ OTP phishable (MITM, MFA fatigue) ✅ Local validation — no browser dependency
Attack Surface Browser, extensions, registration servers Brute force, credential stuffing, OTP interception Total air-gap, local RAM challenge
Cloud / Federation Dependency ⚠️ Mandatory registration server 🛠️ Varies by IAM ❌ None — fully offline operation
Persistent Secret Public key stored server-side Password + shared OTP secret ✅ Ephemeral in RAM — zero persistence
User Experience (UX) Good — browser-native integration Slower — manual password & TOTP entry Ultra-fluid: 2–3 clicks (ID + Password) + 1 click for TOTP.
Full authentication ≈ under 4s — no typing, no network exposure.
Sovereignty / Neutrality ⚠️ Browser and FIDO server dependent 🛠️ Medium (self-hostable but persistent) ✅ Total — independent, offline, local
Compliance & Traceability Server-side WebAuthn logs / metadata Access logs, reusable OTPs GDPR/NIS2-compliant — no stored or transmitted data
Quantum Resilience Algorithm-dependent Low — reusable secrets ✅ Structural — nothing to decrypt post-use
Operational Cost FIDO keys + IAM integration Low but high user maintenance Local NFC HSM — one-time cost, zero server maintenance

🔹 Operational Analysis

Manual entry of username, password, and TOTP takes on average 12–20 seconds, with a high risk of human error.
In contrast, PassCypher HSM PGP automates these steps through embedded cryptology and local proof-of-possession:
2–3 clicks for ID + password, plus a third click for TOTP — full authentication in under 4 seconds, with no typing or network exposure.

⮞ Summary — Advantage of the Sovereign Model

  • FIDO removes passwords but depends on browsers and identity servers.
  • TOTP adds temporal security but remains vulnerable to interception and MFA fatigue.
  • PassCypher HSM PGP unites speed, sovereignty, and structural security: air-gap, zero persistence, hardware proof.

✓ Sovereign Recommendations

  • Replace manual password/TOTP entry with a RAM-only HSM module for automated authentication.
  • Adopt an ephemeral-first policy: derive → execute → destroy instantly in volatile memory.
  • Eliminate browser and extension dependencies — validate identities locally via air-gap.
  • Quantify performance gains and human error reduction in critical architectures.

FIDO Hardware with Biometrics (Fingerprint) vs NFC HSM PassCypher — Technical Comparison

Some modern FIDO keys integrate an on-device biometric sensor (match-on-device) to reduce the risk of misuse by third parties.
While this enhancement improves usability, it does not remove the software dependency (WebAuthn, OS, firmware) nor the persistence of private keys stored in the Secure Element.
In contrast, the NFC HSM PassCypher devices combine physical possession, configurable multifactor authentication, and segmented RAM-only architecture, ensuring total independence from server infrastructures.

Verifiable Technical Points

  • Match-on-device: Fingerprints are verified locally within the secure element. Templates are not exported but remain bound to proprietary firmware.
  • Fallback PIN: When biometric verification fails, a PIN or recovery phrase is required to access the key.
  • Liveness / Anti-spoofing: Resistance to fingerprint spoofing varies by manufacturer. Liveness detection algorithms are not standardised nor always disclosed.
  • Credential Persistence: FIDO private keys are stored permanently inside a secure element — they persist after usage.
  • Interface Dependency: FIDO relies on WebAuthn and requires a server interaction for validation, preventing full air-gap operation.

Comparative Table

Criterion Biometric FIDO Keys NFC HSM PassCypher
Secret Storage Persistent in secure element ⚠️ Segmented AES-256-CBC encryption; volatile keys erased after execution
Biometrics Match-on-device; local template; fallback PIN. Liveness check varies by vendor; methods are not standardised or always disclosed. 🛠️ Managed via NFC smartphone; combinable with contextual factors (e.g., geolocation zone).
Storage Capacity Limited credentials (typically 10–100 depending on firmware) Up to 100 secret labels (e.g. 50 TOTP + 50 ID/Password pairs)
Air-gap Capability No — requires browser, OS, and WebAuthn server Yes — fully offline architecture, zero network dependency
MFA Policies Fixed by manufacturer: biometrics + PIN Fully customisable: up to 15 factors and 9 trust criteria per secret
Post-compromise Resilience Residual risk if device and PIN are compromised No persistent data after session (RAM-only)
Cryptographic Transparency Proprietary firmware and algorithms Documented and auditable algorithms (EviCore / PassCypher)
UX / User Friction Requires WebAuthn + browser + OS; fallback PIN required 🆗 TOTP: manual PIN entry displayed on Android NFC app (standard OTP behaviour).
ID + Password: contactless auto-fill secured by NFC pairing between smartphone and Chromium browser.
Click field → encrypted request → NFC pass → field auto-filled.

Factual Conclusion

Biometric FIDO keys improve ergonomics and reduce casual misuse, but they do not alter the persistent nature of the model.
NFC HSM PassCypher, with their RAM-only operation, segmented cryptography, and zero server dependency, deliver a sovereign, auditable, and contextual solution for strong authentication without external trust.

Comparative UX Friction — Hardware Level

Ease of use is a strategic factor in authentication adoption. The following table compares hardware devices based on friction level, software dependency, and offline capability.

Hardware System User Friction Level Usage Details
FIDO Key (no biometrics) ⚠️ High Requires browser + WebAuthn server + physical button. No local control.
FIDO Key with Biometrics 🟡 Medium Local biometric + fallback PIN; depends on firmware and browser integration.
Integrated TPM (PC) ⚠️ High Transparent for user but system-bound, non-portable, not air-gapped.
Standard USB HSM 🟡 Medium Requires insertion, third-party software, and often a password. Limited customisation.
Smartcard / Chip Card ⚠️ High Needs physical reader, PIN, and middleware. High friction outside managed environments.
NFC HSM PassCypher ✅ Low to None Contactless use; automatic ID/Password filling; manual PIN for TOTP (standard OTP behaviour).

Strategic Reading

  • TOTP: Manual PIN entry is universal across OTP systems (Google Authenticator, YubiKey, etc.). PassCypher maintains this logic — but fully offline and RAM-only.
  • ID + Password: PassCypher uniquely provides contactless auto-login secured by cryptographic pairing between NFC smartphone and Chromium browser.
  • Air-gap: All other systems depend on an OS, browser, or server. PassCypher is the only one that operates in a 100% offline mode, including for auto-fill operations.

⮞ Summary

PassCypher NFC HSM achieves the lowest friction level possible for a sovereign, secure, and multifactor authentication system.
No other hardware model combines:

  • RAM-only execution
  • Contactless auto-login
  • Up to 15 configurable factors
  • Zero server dependency
  • Fluid UX on Android and PC

Sovereign Multifactor Authentication — The PassCypher NFC HSM Model

Beyond a hardware comparison, the PassCypher NFC HSM model, based on EviCore NFC HSM technology, embodies a true sovereign multifactor authentication doctrine.
It is founded on segmented cryptology and volatile memory, where each secret acts as an autonomous entity protected by encapsulated AES-256-CBC encryption layers.
Each derivation depends on contextual, physical, and logical criteria.
Even if one factor is compromised, the secret remains indecipherable without full reconstruction of the segmented key.

Architecture — 15 Modular Factors

Each NFC HSM PassCypher module can combine up to 15 authentication factors, including 9 configurable dynamic trust criteria per secret.
This granularity surpasses FIDO, TPM, and PKI standards, granting the user verifiable, sovereign control over their access policies.

Factor Description Purpose
1️⃣ NFC Pairing Key Authenticates the Android terminal using a unique pairing key. Initial HSM access.
2️⃣ Anti-counterfeit Key Hardware ECC BLS12-381 128-bit key integrated in silicon. HSM authenticity and exchange integrity.
3️⃣ Administrator Password Protects configuration and access policies. Hierarchical control.
4️⃣ User Password / Biometric Local biometric or cognitive factor on NFC smartphone. Interactive user validation.
5–13️⃣ Contextual Factors Up to 9 per secret: geolocation, BSSID, secondary password, device fingerprint, barcode, phone ID, QR code, time condition, NFC tap. Dynamic multi-context protection.
14️⃣ Segmented AES-256-CBC Encryption Encapsulation of each factor within a segmented key. Total cryptographic isolation.
15️⃣ RAM-only Erasure Instant destruction of derived keys post-use. Removes post-session attack vectors.

Cryptographic Doctrine — Segmented Key Encapsulation

The system is based on independent cryptographic segments, where each trust label is encapsulated and derived from the main key.
No session key exists outside volatile memory, guaranteeing non-reproducibility and non-persistence of secrets.

Cryptographic Outcomes

  • PGP AES-256-CBC encapsulation of each segment
  • No data persisted outside volatile memory
  • Combinatorial multifactor authentication
  • Native protection against cloning and reverse engineering
  • Post-quantum resilience by segmented design

This architecture positions PassCypher NFC HSM as the first truly sovereign, auditable, and non-persistent authentication model
fully operational without servers or external trust infrastructures.
It defines a new benchmark for post-quantum security and sovereign passwordless standardisation.

Zero Trust, Compliance, and Sovereignty in Passwordless Authentication

The sovereign passwordless model does not oppose the Zero Trust paradigm — it extends it.
Designed for environments where verification, segmentation, and non-persistence are essential, it translates the principles of NIST SP 800-207 into a hardware-based, disconnected logic.

Zero Trust Principle (NIST) Sovereign Implementation
Verify explicitly Local proof-of-possession via physical key
Assume breach Ephemeral RAM-only sessions — instant destruction
Least privilege Keys segmented by purpose (micro-HSM)
Continuous evaluation Dynamic authentication without persistent sessions
Protect data everywhere Embedded AES-256-CBC / PGP encryption — off-cloud
Visibility and analytics Local audit without persistent logs — RAM-only traceability

⮞ Summary — Institutional Compliance

The sovereign model is inherently compliant with GDPR, NIS2, DORA and ISO/IEC 27001 frameworks:
no data is exported, retained, or synchronised.
It exceeds Zero Trust principles by eliminating persistence itself and ensuring local traceability without network exposure.

Passwordless Timeline — From FIDO to Cryptologic Sovereignty

  • 2009: Creation of the FIDO Alliance.
  • 2014: Standardisation of FIDO UAF/U2F.
  • 2015: Freemindtronic Andorra 🇦🇩 launches the first NFC HSM PassCypher — an offline, passwordless authentication system based on proof-of-physical-possession.
    A foundational milestone in the emergence of a sovereign civilian model.
  • 2017: Integration of the WebAuthn standard within the W3C.
  • 2020: Introduction of passkeys (Apple/Google) and the first major cloud dependencies.
  • 2021: EviCypher — an authentication system using segmented cryptographic keys — wins the Gold Medal at the Geneva International Inventions Exhibition.
    Based on cryptographic fragmentation and volatile memory, it becomes the core technology powering PassCypher NFC HSM and PassCypher HSM PGP ecosystems.
  • 2021: PassCypher NFC HSM receives the Most Innovative Hardware Password Manager award at the RSA Conference 2021 Global InfoSec Awards, confirming the maturity of the civilian offline model.
  • 2022: Presentation at Eurosatory 2022 of a version dedicated to sovereign and defense use
    the PassCypher HSM PGP, featuring RAM-only architecture and EviCypher segmented cryptography, offering structural quantum resilience.
  • 2023: Public identification of vulnerabilities in WebAuthn, OAuth, and passkeys highlights the necessity of a truly sovereign offline model.
  • 2026: PassCypher is selected as an Intersec Awards finalist in Dubai, recognised as the Best Cybersecurity Solution for its civilian RAM-only sovereign model.

⮞ Summary — The Path Toward Cryptologic Sovereignty

From 2015 to 2026, Freemindtronic Andorra 🇦🇩 has built a sovereign continuum of innovation:
the invention of the NFC HSM PassCypher (civilian), the EviCypher technological foundation (Geneva Gold Medal 2021), international recognition (RSA 2021),
the RAM-only sovereign defense model (Eurosatory 2022), and institutional consecration (Intersec 2026).
This trajectory establishes the sovereign passwordless doctrine as a dual-use standard — civil and defense — based on proof-of-possession and segmented volatile cryptology.

Interoperability and Sovereign Migration

Organisations can progressively adopt the sovereign model without disruption.
Migration occurs in three phases:
hybrid (FIDO + local coexistence), air-gapped (offline validation), then sovereign (RAM-only).
Integrated NFC and HSM modules ensure backward compatibility while eliminating cloud dependencies.

✓ Sovereign Migration Methodology

  1. Identify cloud dependencies and OAuth federations.
  2. Introduce local PassCypher modules (HSM/NFC).
  3. Activate local proof-of-possession for critical access.
  4. Remove remaining synchronisations and persistence layers.
  5. Validate GDPR/NIS2 compliance through sovereign audit.

This model ensures backward compatibility, operational continuity, and a smooth transition toward cryptologic sovereignty.

Weak Signals — Quantum and AI

The acceleration of quantum computing and generative AI introduces unprecedented security challenges.
The sovereign model distinguishes itself through intrinsic resilience — it does not rely on computational strength but on the controlled disappearance of the secret.

  • Quantum Threats: Persistent PKI architectures become vulnerable to factorisation attacks.
  • AI-driven Attacks: Biometric systems can be bypassed using deepfakes or synthetic models.
  • Structural Resilience: The sovereign model avoids these threats by design — there is nothing to decrypt or reproduce.

⮞ Summary — Post-Quantum Doctrine

True resistance does not emerge from a new post-quantum algorithm, but from a philosophy:
the principle of the ephemeral secret.
This concept could inspire future European and international standards for sovereign passwordless authentication.

Official and Scientific Definitions of Passwordless

Understanding the term passwordless requires distinguishing between institutional definitions (NIST, ISO, Microsoft) and the scientific foundations of authentication.
These definitions demonstrate that passwordless authentication is not a product, but a method — based on proof of possession, proof of knowledge, and proof of existence of the user.

🔹 NIST SP 800-63B Definition

According to NIST SP 800-63B — Digital Identity Guidelines:

“Authentication establishes confidence in the identities of users presented electronically to an information system. Each authentication factor is based on something the subscriber knows, has, or is.”

In other words, authentication relies on three factor types:

  • Something you know — knowledge: a secret, PIN, or passphrase.
  • Something you have — possession: a token, card, or hardware key.
  • Something you are — inherence: a biometric or physical trait.

🔹 ISO/IEC 29115:2013 Definition

The ISO/IEC 29115 defines the Entity Authentication Assurance Framework (EAAF), which specifies four assurance levels (IAL, AAL, FAL) based on factor strength and independence.
AAL3 represents multi-factor passwordless authentication combining possession and inherence through a secure hardware token.
The PassCypher model aligns with the AAL3 logic — with no persistence or server dependency.

🔹 Microsoft Definition — Passwordless Authentication

From Microsoft Entra Identity documentation:

“Passwordless authentication replaces passwords with strong two-factor credentials resistant to phishing and replay attacks.”

However, these implementations still rely on cloud identity services and federated trust models — limiting sovereignty.

🔹 Doctrinal Synthesis

All definitions converge on one point:
Passwordless does not mean “without secret,” but rather “without persistent password.”
In a sovereign model, trust is local — proof is rooted in physical possession and ephemeral cryptology, not centralised identity.

⮞ Summary — Official Definitions

  • NIST defines three factors: know / have / are.
  • ISO 29115 formalises AAL3 as the reference for passwordless assurance.
  • Microsoft describes a phishing-resistant model, but still cloud-federated.
  • The Freemindtronic sovereign model transcends these by eliminating persistence and network dependency.

Sovereign Glossary (Enriched)

This glossary presents the key terms of sovereign passwordless authentication, founded on possession, volatility, and cryptologic independence.

Term Sovereign Definition Origin / Reference
Passwordless Authentication without password entry, based on possession and/or inherence, with no persistent secret. NIST SP 800-63B / ISO 29115
Sovereign Authentication No cloud, server, or federation dependency; validated locally in volatile memory. Freemindtronic Doctrine
RAM-only All cryptographic execution occurs in volatile memory only; no persistent trace. EviCypher (Geneva Gold Medal 2021)
Proof of Possession Validation through physical object (NFC key, HSM, card) ensuring real presence. NIST SP 800-63B
Segmented Key Key divided into volatile fragments, recomposed on demand without persistence. EviCypher / PassCypher
Quantum-resilient (Structural) Resilience achieved through absence of exploitable data post-execution. Freemindtronic Doctrine
Air-gapped System physically isolated from networks, preventing remote interception. NIST Cybersecurity Framework
Sovereign Zero Trust Extension of the Zero Trust model integrating disconnection and volatility as proof mechanisms. Freemindtronic Andorra 🇦🇩
Embedded Cryptology Encryption and signature operations executed directly on hardware (NFC, HSM, SoC). Freemindtronic Patent FR 1656118
Ephemerality (Volatility) Automatic destruction of secrets after use; security through erasure. Freemindtronic Andorra 🇦🇩 / RAM-only Doctrine

⮞ Summary — Unified Terminology

This glossary defines the foundational terminology of the sovereign passwordless doctrine,
distinguishing federated passwordless models from cryptologically autonomous architectures based on possession, volatility, and non-persistence.

Frequently Asked Questions — Sovereign Passwordless Authentication

What is sovereign passwordless authentication?

Core principle

Sovereign passwordless authentication operates entirely offline — no server, no cloud.
Verification relies on proof of possession (NFC/HSM) and RAM-only cryptology with zero persistence.

Why it matters

Trust is local, independent of any identity federation, enhancing digital sovereignty and reducing attack surfaces.

Key takeaway

Hardware validation, volatile memory execution, and zero data retention.

Important distinction

FIDO2/WebAuthn requires server registration and a federated browser.
The sovereign model performs the entire challenge in RAM, with no storage or sync.

Result

Quantum-resilient by design: after execution, nothing remains to decrypt.

Takeaway

Fewer intermediaries, more autonomy and control.

Definition

RAM-only means all cryptographic operations occur entirely in volatile memory.

Security impact

When the session ends, everything is destroyed — zero persistence, zero trace, zero reuse.

Key insight

Drastically reduces post-execution and exfiltration risks.

Principle

The user proves they physically possess a device (NFC key, HSM, or card). No memorised secret is required.

Advantage

Local hardware validation and network independence enable true sovereign passwordless authentication.

Essential idea

“What you have” replaces both passwords and federated identities.

Official framework

The NIST triad (know / have / are) is respected. ISO/IEC 29115 defines this as AAL3 (possession + inherence via hardware token).

The sovereign extension

Freemindtronic enhances this through zero persistence and RAM-only execution.

Key takeaway

Principle-level compliance, implementation-level independence.

Clear distinction

Passwordless = no entry of passwords.
Password-free = no storage of passwords.

Sovereign enhancement

Combines both: no entry, no persistence, local proof of possession.

Memorable point

Fewer dependencies, greater operational integrity.

Initial steps

  1. Audit cloud/OAuth dependencies.
  2. Deploy PassCypher NFC/HSM modules.
  3. Activate proof of possession for critical access.
  4. Remove synchronisation mechanisms.
  5. Validate GDPR/NIS2/DORA compliance.

Outcome

Gradual transition, continuous service, strengthened sovereignty.

Key concept

Ephemeral-first method: derive → use → destroy (RAM-only).

Core concept

Security is not only algorithmic — it’s based on the absence of exploitable material.

Mechanism

Key segmentation + volatility = no lasting secret after execution.

What to remember

Resilience through design, not brute cryptographic strength.

Main domains

Defense, Healthcare, Finance, Energy, and critical infrastructures.

Why

Need for offline operation, zero persistence, and proof of possession for compliance and exposure reduction.

Reference

See: PassCypher — Intersec 2026 finalist.

Yes

The PassCypher ecosystem (NFC HSM & HSM PGP) delivers RAM-only sovereign passwordless authentication — universal, offline, cloud-free, server-free, and federation-free.

Immediate benefits

Operational sovereignty, reduced attack surface, long-term compliance.

Key message

A practical, deployable path toward sovereign passwordless authentication.

Further Reading — Deepening Sovereignty in Passwordless Authentication

To explore the strategic scope of the sovereign passwordless model in greater depth, it is essential to understand how RAM-only cryptographic architectures are reshaping cybersecurity in a lasting way.
Through its innovations, Freemindtronic Andorra 🇦🇩 illustrates a coherent continuum: invention → doctrine → recognition.

🔹 Freemindtronic Internal Resources

🔹 Complementary Institutional References

🔹 Doctrinal Perspectives

The sovereign passwordless model does more than strengthen security — it defines a universal, neutral, and interoperable trust framework.
It prefigures the emergence of a European doctrine of sovereign authentication, structured around embedded cryptology, proof of possession, and controlled volatility.

⮞ Summary — Going Further

  • Explore the convergence between RAM-only and Zero Trust models.
  • Analyse cryptologic sovereignty in contrast to federated identity frameworks.
  • Follow the ongoing ISO/NIST standardisation of the sovereign passwordless model.
  • Assess quantum and AI impacts on decentralised authentication.

Manifesto Quote on Passwordless Authentication

“Passwordless does not mean the absence of a password — it means the presence of sovereignty:
the sovereignty of the user over their identity, of cryptology over the network, and of volatile memory over persistence.”
— Jacques Gascuel, Freemindtronic Andorra 🇦🇩

🔝 Back to top

Sovereign SSH Authentication with PassCypher HSM PGP — Zero Key in Clear

Flat graphic poster illustrating SSH key breaches and defense through hardware-anchored SSH authentication using PassCypher HSM PGP, OpenPGP AES-256 encryption, and BLE-HID zero-trust workflows.

SSH Key PassCypher HSM PGP establishes a sovereign SSH authentication chain for zero-trust infrastructures, where keys are generated and sealed inside a hardware HSM under OpenSSH AES-256 encryption. It demonstrates how to secure an SSH key — or, in French, comment sécuriser une clé SSH — by ensuring that the private key is never exposed in the clear, neither on disk nor in memory. Through BLE-HID passphrase injection, it eliminates keylogger risks and enforces a zero-clear-key policy, bringing hardware-anchored SSH security to Debian, macOS, and Windows environments. This sovereign method combines OpenSSH encryption, hardened KDFs such as bcrypt, and NFC-triggered hardware interactions to protect SSH credentials across multi-OS infrastructures.

Express Summary — Sovereign SSH Authentication for All Operating Systems

⮞ In Brief

Quick read (≈ 4 minutes): generate your SSH key pair directly inside PassCypher HSM PGP, export only the public key to the server, and keep the private key sealed in an OpenSSH-encrypted private key file (id_ed25519, id_rsa, etc.). The private key is never stored in the clear. During connection, it is decrypted ephemerally in RAM using a passphrase injected either manually or through the PassCypher NFC HSM via its BLE-HID hardware keyboard emulator. This sovereign SSH authentication model eliminates the risk of keyloggers and clipboard theft while supporting long, post-quantum-ready passphrases (≥256 bits).

⚙ Core Concept

Key generation inside HSM → OpenSSH passphrase encryption (AES-256 + hardened KDF) → export of public key (.pub OpenSSH) → safe storage and duplication of encrypted private key (id_ed25519 (ou id_rsa, selon le cas)) → ephemeral local decryption via NFC / BLE-HID injected passphrase → authenticated SSH session.

Interoperability

Fully compatible with Debian, Ubuntu, Fedora, FreeBSD, macOS, Windows (WSL, PuTTY), Android (Termux) and iOS (Blink Shell). Native OpenSSH format ensures universal portability and sovereign SSH key management across environments.

Reading Parameters

Express summary reading time: ≈ 4 minutes
Advanced summary reading time: ≈ 6 minutes
Full chronicle reading time: ≈ 35 minutes
Last updated: 2025-10-02
Complexity level: Advanced / Expert
Technical density: ≈ 73 %
Languages available: CAT · EN · ES · FR
Linguistic specificity: Sovereign lexicon — high technical density
Reading order: Summary → Architecture → Security → Workflow → Rotation → EviSSH → Resources
Accessibility: Screen-reader optimized — semantic anchors included
Editorial type: Strategic Chronicle — Digital Security · Technical News
Author: Jacques Gascuel — inventor and founder of Freemindtronic Andorra, expert in NFC HSM technologies, embedded cryptography, and zero-trust architectures. His research focuses on digital sovereignty and post-quantum resilience.

Editorial note — This operational guide evolves continuously with field feedback, audits, and PQC developments.
Diagramme fonctionnel illustrant l’architecture SSH Key PassCypher HSM PGP. Le processus inclut la génération locale de la clé SSH dans PassCypher, la protection par passphrase chiffrée AES-256 via OpenPGP, le stockage sécurisé du conteneur *.key.gpg, et l’injection de la passphrase par le module PassCypher NFC HSM via BLE-HID AES-128 CBC vers le serveur SSH. Vue 16/9 sur fond blanc.
✪ Technical Diagram — Sovereign SSH Authentication with PassCypher HSM PGP: generation, OpenSSH AES-256 native encryption, encrypted storage, and passphrase injection via BLE-HID AES-128 CBC.

Advanced Summary — Architecture and Secure SSH Workflow with Sovereign SSH Authentication via PassCypher HSM PGP

⮞ In Detail

The workflow for sovereign SSH authentication follows a secure and repeatable pattern. First, PassCypher HSM PGP generates the SSH key pair internally. Then, the system encrypts the private key in an OpenSSH private key format using AES-256 encryption and a hardened KDF. Only the public key (.pub) is exported for server use. The encrypted private key (id_ed25519 or id_rsa) stays sealed inside the HSM. When needed, the HSM decrypts the key ephemerally in RAM using an injected passphrase via NFC or BLE-HID. The SSH connection then proceeds without exposing any clear-text key. This step-by-step model keeps each process verifiable, auditable, and sovereign.

Hardware-Based SSH Key Management

Unlike cloud solutions, PassCypher HSM PGP provides SSH key management entirely within a hardware module. It enables complete SSH key rotation and ephemeral decryption while maintaining a zero-clear-key security posture. This architecture ensures that SSH private keys never exist in plaintext — not on disk, not in memory, and not in any centralized vault — thereby delivering hardware-anchored sovereignty for critical systems.

Beyond Conventional SSH Key Management Platforms

While many SSH key management solutions rely on cloud-based vaults or software-only zero-knowledge models, PassCypher HSM PGP introduces a sovereign alternative that removes every intermediary layer. All cryptographic operations — from SSH key generation to rotation and lifecycle management — occur inside the hardware HSM. No agent, vault, or remote API ever handles private keys or passphrases.

This approach merges the benefits of zero-knowledge architectures with hardware-level isolation. Each SSH credential is locally created, Encrypted with OpenSSH AES-256 encryption, and stored in a zero-clear-key state. Unlike software-based systems that synchronize secrets through cloud or network vaults, PassCypher’s design ensures no key leaves the trusted hardware perimeter.

The result is a hardware-anchored SSH key management solution that delivers the same usability and automation found in traditional secrets managers — including key rotation, team access control, auditability, and lifecycle orchestration — but under a sovereign, offline-capable, zero-cloud architecture.

Why Secure SSH with a Hardware HSM

Unencrypted SSH keys remain vulnerable to theft, duplication, and accidental backup. Attackers can exploit them silently for persistence. PassCypher HSM PGP solves this by locking the private key inside a hardware-based trust boundary. Each operation requires hardware confirmation. Decryption occurs only when an authenticated passphrase is injected. This removes dependence on software agents and delivers hardware-anchored sovereignty for SSH authentication. As a result, even on untrusted machines, administrators maintain cryptographic control of their access credentials.

HSM PGP Architecture — Technical Components

The sovereign SSH authentication architecture combines proven OpenSSH native encryption with hardware isolation. Each component plays a specific role in the zero-clear-key chain.

  • OpenSSH private key format: Encrypts with AES-256 (CTR, CBC, or GCM) and ensures data integrity with MDC.
  • Hardened KDF: Uses PBKDF2 (≥200k iterations) or bcrypt (default) to resist brute force.
  • Passphrase: Randomly generated inside the HSM. Recommended entropy ≥256 bits for PQC readiness.
  • Injection: Delivered through NFC trigger or BLE-HID emulation. This prevents typing and blocks keyloggers.
  • Secure duplication: The encrypted id_ed25519 or id_rsa can be safely stored on EviKey NFC HSM, USB, or NAS. It remains secure as long as the KDF and passphrase are protected.

Deploying Sovereign SSH Authentication with PassCypher HSM PGP on Debian VPS and Beyond

⮞ TL;DR

This section explains how to deploy SSH Key PassCypher HSM PGP for secure remote access on Debian VPS, OVHcloud, and hybrid infrastructures. The HSM generates SSH key pairs internally and encrypts the private key as id_ed25519 or id_rsa. The system exports only the public key for registration. When connecting, the HSM decrypts the private key temporarily in RAM. A passphrase from PassCypher NFC HSM injects via BLE-HID keyboard emulation using AES-128 CBC encryption. No plaintext key ever touches disk or memory. This design removes keyloggers, clipboard theft, and man-in-the-browser risks.
It guarantees zero-clear-key SSH authentication across platforms.

Operational Alert — BLE-HID Pairing Security

Avoid using the “Just Works” pairing mode in Bluetooth Low Energy. Instead, enforce Secure Connections mode with AES-128 CBC encryption. Always use numeric authentication by PIN or code confirmation. This configuration prevents unauthenticated pairing. It also blocks MITM attacks during BLE initialization. In air-gapped or classified setups, BLE-HID provides direct passphrase transfer with zero dependency on cloud middleware. This maintains operational sovereignty, even under isolation.

2025 Cyberculture Cybersecurity Digital Security

CryptPeer messagerie P2P WebRTC : appels directs chiffrés de bout en bout

2026 Awards Cyberculture Digital Security Distinction Excellence EviOTP NFC HSM Technology EviPass EviPass NFC HSM technology EviPass Technology finalists PassCypher PassCypher

Quantum-Resistant Passwordless Manager — PassCypher finalist, Intersec Awards 2026 (FIDO-free, RAM-only)

2025 Digital Security Tech Fixes Security Solutions Technical News

SSH Key PassCypher HSM PGP — Sécuriser l’accès multi-OS à un VPS

2025 Cyberculture Digital Security

Authentification multifacteur : anatomie, OTP, risques

2024 Cyberculture Digital Security

Russian Cyberattack Microsoft: An Unprecedented Threat

2021 Cyberculture Digital Security Phishing

Phishing Cyber victims caught between the hammer and the anvil

2024 Articles Digital Security News

Russian Espionage Hacking Tools Revealed

2024 Digital Security Spying Technical News

Side-Channel Attacks via HDMI and AI: An Emerging Threat

2024 Digital Security Technical News

Apple M chip vulnerability: A Breach in Data Security

2023 Digital Security Phishing

BITB Attacks: How to Avoid Phishing by iFrame

2024 Cyberculture Digital Security News Training

Andorra National Cyberattack Simulation: A Global First in Cyber Defense

Articles Digital Security EviVault Technology NFC HSM technology Technical News

EviVault NFC HSM vs Flipper Zero: The duel of an NFC HSM and a Pentester

Articles Cryptocurrency Digital Security Technical News

Securing IEO STO ICO IDO and INO: The Challenges and Solutions

Articles Cyberculture Digital Security Technical News

Protect Meta Account Identity Theft with EviPass and EviOTP

2023 Articles Cyberculture Digital Security Technical News

Strong Passwords in the Quantum Computing Era

2024 Articles Digital Security News Spying

How to protect yourself from stalkerware on any phone

2023 Articles DataShielder Digital Security Military spying News NFC HSM technology Spying

Pegasus: The cost of spying with one of the most powerful spyware in the world

2024 Articles Compagny spying Digital Security Industrial spying Military spying News Spying Zero trust

KingsPawn A Spyware Targeting Civil Society

2024 Articles Digital Security EviKey NFC HSM EviPass News SSH

Terrapin attack: How to Protect Yourself from this New Threat to SSH Security

Articles Crypto Currency Cryptocurrency Digital Security EviPass Technology NFC HSM technology Phishing

Ledger Security Breaches from 2017 to 2023: How to Protect Yourself from Hackers

2024 Articles Digital Security News Phishing

Google OAuth2 security flaw: How to Protect Yourself from Hackers

Articles Digital Security EviCore NFC HSM Technology EviPass NFC HSM technology NFC HSM technology

TETRA Security Vulnerabilities: How to Protect Critical Infrastructures

2023 Articles DataShielder Digital Security EviCore NFC HSM Technology EviCypher NFC HSM EviCypher Technology NFC HSM technology

FormBook Malware: How to Protect Your Gmail and Other Data

Articles Crypto Currency Digital Security EviSeed EviVault Technology News

Enhancing Crypto Wallet Security: How EviSeed and EviVault Could Have Prevented the $41M Crypto Heist

Articles Digital Security News

How to Recover and Protect Your SMS on Android

Articles Crypto Currency Digital Security News

Coinbase blockchain hack: How It Happened and How to Avoid It

Articles Compagny spying Digital Security Industrial spying Military spying Spying

Protect yourself from Pegasus spyware with EviCypher NFC HSM

Articles Digital Security EviCypher Technology

Protect US emails from Chinese hackers with EviCypher NFC HSM?

Articles Digital Security

What is Juice Jacking and How to Avoid It?

2023 Articles Cryptocurrency Digital Security NFC HSM technology Technologies

How BIP39 helps you create and restore your Bitcoin wallets

Articles Digital Security Phishing

Snake Malware: The Russian Spy Tool

Articles Cryptocurrency Digital Security Phishing

ViperSoftX How to avoid the malware that steals your passwords

Articles Digital Security Phishing

Kevin Mitnick’s Password Hacking with Hashtopolis

In sovereign cybersecurity ↑ This chronicle belongs to Digital Security and Tech Fixes & Security Solutions. Explore related content such as EviSSH — SSH Key Management in HSM, EviKey NFC HSM, Secure SSH VPS with PassCypher HSM and PassCypher HSM PGP — Technical Note.

Chronicle — EviSSH: Embedded Engine Inside PassCypher HSM PGP

EviSSH is the embedded technology within PassCypher HSM PGP dedicated to sovereign SSH key generation, management, and storage. It relies on the EviEngine to execute all cryptographic operations locally. Every SSH key pair creation and OpenSSH passphrase encryption happens client-side. No data, keys, or metadata ever leave the user’s environment.

Role and Operation

  • Integrated Interface — EviSSH is directly accessible through the PassCypher HSM PGP browser extension.
  • Local Generation — SSH key pairs are generated using Git for Windows or its Linux/macOS equivalent under EviEngine orchestration.
  • Encryption — The private key is automatically wrapped in an OpenSSH private key format encrypted with AES-256 and a hardened KDF.
  • Sovereign Storage — Users choose the storage path: local .ssh folder, EviKey NFC HSM, NAS, or external drive.
  • Interoperability — Public keys export in standard OpenSSH format and work across Debian, Ubuntu, macOS, Windows, Android, and iOS.

EviEngine — Core Orchestrator

EviEngine coordinates secure communication between the browser, the OS, and HSM components. It generates SSH keys via Git, manages PassCypher extension licensing, and runs entirely offline. Every operation executes locally on the user’s device, ensuring full sovereignty and auditability.

HSM Integration

  • PassCypher NFC HSM — Injects passphrases through a BLE-HID channel encrypted with AES-128 CBC.
  • EviKey NFC HSM — Stores encrypted key containers (id_ed25519 or id_rsa) protected by the user-defined passphrase.
Note: EviSSH is not a standalone tool. It is a native PassCypher HSM PGP component powered by EviEngine. Its purpose is to unify SSH key generation, management, and lifecycle sovereignty in a fully local, auditable environment.

Generating a Sovereign SSH Key with PassCypher HSM PGP

SSH key creation occurs through the EviSSH module embedded in PassCypher HSM PGP using the EviEngine. It leverages Git to build the SSH key pair, then encrypts it instantly through PassCypher HSM PGP. The entire process stays local and offline.

Interface du module PassCypher — création locale d’une clé cryptographique asymétrique avec choix d’algorithme pour accès distant sécurisé
L’extension PassCypher HSM PGP permet de générer une clé SSH sécurisée localement, avec sélection d’algorithme (RSA, ECDSA, EdDSA) et affichage du niveau d’entropie de la passphrase.

Algorithm Selection — Cryptographic Choice within PassCypher

The user selects algorithm and key size directly in the PassCypher HSM PGP interface. Available families include:

  • RSA: 2048 bits · 3072 bits · 4096 bits
  • ECDSA: 256 bits (p-256) · 384 bits (p-384) · 521 bits (p-521)
  • EdDSA: ed25519 — recommended for its robustness, compactness, and native OpenSSH support

Generation Steps — Transparent Workflow

  1. Open the SSH module inside PassCypher HSM PGP.
  2. Define a unique key label, for example pc-hsm-pgp-ssh-key.
  3. Select the desired algorithm (ed25519 or rsa-4096).
  4. Set a passphrase, either typed manually or injected via PassCypher NFC HSM using its BLE-HID AES-128 CBC emulator. This passphrase encrypts the private key container.
  5. Validate the action. EviSSH generates the pair through Git, and PassCypher HSM PGP encrypts the private key. Files save automatically in the chosen path, by default ~/.ssh/ or an EviKey NFC HSM.

Result — Exported Artifacts

  • id_ed25519.pub — public key copied to the remote server.
  • id_ed25519 — private key encrypted by PassCypher HSM PGP in native OpenSSH format (AES-256 + bcrypt KDF)

The passphrase, ideally ≥ 256 bits of entropy, can be typed or injected from the HSM via BLE-HID, avoiding exposure to keyloggers.

Memorable Passphrase Generator — “Two Words + Symbol” Option

✓ Objective: Provide a random yet memorable passphrase by combining two to four random words with special characters as separators. It is ideal for mobile operators who need recall without compromising hardened KDF protection and HSM injection (BLE-HID/NFC).

The built-in generator:

  • Selects random words from an embedded wordlist.
  • Inserts 1–3 special characters between or around words.
  • Displays an estimated entropy score.
  • Optionally stores the passphrase in the HSM or injects it via BLE-HID during container encryption.
⚠ Entropy Alert — Two-word combinations offer limited entropy unless the wordlist is extremely large (≥ 2²⁰ entries). For strong resistance, prefer three to four words from a >10 k entry list, add two random special characters, use non-alphabetic separators, and enable bcrypt with high memory cost. For PQC-aware posture, target ≥ 256 bits of effective entropy or let the HSM generate it randomly.

Practical Example

Generate a 3-word passphrase with two special characters:

# Example (PassCypher interface)
1) Choose wordlist: common-wordlist-16k
2) Words: 3
3) Separator: '-'; special chars: '#!'
→ Example output: atlas-siren#!

Use PassCypher NFC HSM to inject it via BLE-HID during encryption:

ssh-keygen -p -o -a 16 -t ed25519 -f ~/.ssh/id_ed25519 --output id_ed25519.key.gpg --compress-level 0 id_ed25519
# Passphrase is injected by PassCypher BLE-HID at pinentry prompt

Operational Recommendations

  • For critical servers or bastions, prefer HSM generation or increase word count.
  • Enable bcrypt with m ≥ 512 MB, t ≥ 3, p ≥ 4 during encryption.
  • Never store the passphrase in plain text or unprotected form.
  • Check entropy estimation in UI and adjust with extra words or symbols if required.
PassCypher HSM PGP interface showing memorable passphrase generator using two words plus symbols for SSH OpenPGP keys
✪ PassCypher Interface — Memorable passphrase generator (two words + symbols) designed for mobility and usability.
✓ Sovereign Note — The generator assists the operator, but true sovereignty is achieved when the HSM creates or confirms the passphrase. This avoids predictability linked to small wordlists.

ASCII-95 Generator — High-Entropy Password / Passphrase Mode

The interface below creates ultra-secure passwords or passphrases using all 95 printable ASCII characters. Unlike word-based modes, this option targets maximum entropy and granular control over character classes. It provides real-time entropy estimation, often ≥ 256 bits depending on length. It is meant for use cases where the secret remains encrypted (QR or HSM) and is injected via PassCypher ecosystem (BLE-HID / NFC) without screen display.

PassCypher HSM PGP interface generating high-entropy password using all 95 printable ASCII characters for OpenPGP SSH encryption
✪ Advanced Generator — ASCII-95 password builder with configurable length and character classes; supports QR/HSM export for secrets ≥ 256 bits entropy.

QR Code Export — Direct Transfer to PassCypher NFC HSM

Once a high-entropy password or passphrase is generated through the ASCII-95 module, the user can export the secret as an encrypted QR Code. This code can then be scanned by an Android smartphone with NFC running the Freemindtronic app that includes PassCypher NFC HSM. This sovereign interoperability enables direct transfer from the software HSM to the hardware HSM without network exposure or disk writes. Afterward, PassCypher NFC HSM can inject the secret through its Bluetooth HID keyboard emulator for authentication on any SSH client.

PassCypher HSM PGP interface showing encrypted QR Code export for direct import into an NFC HSM via Android smartphone
✪ Sovereign Export — Encrypted QR Code transfer to PassCypher NFC HSM via Android device, without cloud dependency.

Real-World Example — RSA 4096-bit Private Key Protected by Passphrase

Even an RSA 4096-bit key becomes vulnerable if stored unencrypted. Within PassCypher HSM PGP, the key remains encapsulated and protected by a 141-bit entropy passphrase by default, making brute-force or exfiltration mathematically infeasible. Below is what an OpenSSH-formatted RSA 4096-bit private key looks like once encrypted by passphrase:

-----BEGIN OPENSSH PRIVATE KEY-----
b3BlbnNzaC1rZXktdjEAAAAACmFlczI1Ni1jdHIAAAAGYmNyeXB0AAAAGAAAABA+ghFLmp
Oiw0Z3A4NKn2gHAAAAGAAAAAEAAAIXAAAAB3NzaC1yc2EAAAADAQABAAACAQDK4d0ntIeb
... (truncated for readability) ...
55XA==
-----END OPENSSH PRIVATE KEY-----
💡 Insight — The HSM displays the passphrase entropy in real time (≈ 141 bits default, up to >256 bits depending on length and KDF). This visibility helps assess the secret’s strength. The block starts with BEGIN OPENSSH PRIVATE KEY and a base64-encoded payload. Field b3BlbnNzaC1rZXktdjE= identifies OpenSSH v1 with encryption enabled. Depending on configuration, the engine uses aes256-ctr or aes256-cbc.

After securing key generation and encapsulation, administrators can integrate the sovereign SSH key into their virtual servers. The next section explains how to deploy it on Debian-based VPS instances like OVHcloud.

Integration on VPS (Example – OVH Debian 12)

Integrating a PassCypher HSM PGP SSH key into a VPS involves placing the public key (.pub) inside the server’s authorized_keys file.
OVHcloud allows inserting it directly during VPS creation through its dashboard.

Manual Insertion After Deployment

ssh -p 49152 debian@IPVPS "mkdir -p ~/.ssh && chmod 700 ~/.ssh && cat >> ~/.ssh/authorized_keys" < id_ed25519.pub

Then decrypt the private key locally from its encrypted container:

ssh -i ~/.ssh/id_ed25519 --output ~/.ssh/id_ed25519 ~/.ssh/id_ed25519.key.gpg
chmod 600 ~/.ssh/id_ed25519
ssh -i ~/.ssh/id_ed25519 -p 49152 debian@IPVPS

The decrypted file exists only temporarily. It can self-erase after the SSH session or stay in RAM if mounted on tmpfs.
This “zero-clear-text” approach ensures that no sensitive data persist on disk.

✓ Key Advantage: The encrypted BLE-HID channel injects the passphrase automatically.
No keystroke is capturable. Even on a compromised host, the private key remains unusable without the physical HSM and its secured pairing session.

Once integrated on a server, the same sovereign SSH key can authenticate securely across multiple operating systems.
The following section details how PassCypher HSM PGP maintains this universal compatibility.

Cross-OS compatibility — Universal authentication

The OpenSSH format used by PassCypher HSM PGP guarantees full compatibility with major operating systems. The sovereign design is based on open standards only — no cloud dependencies, no third-party identity services.

OS SSH client Highlights
Debian / Ubuntu OpenSSH Native support for encrypted private keys.
macOS Built-in OpenSSH Managed via ssh-add or BLE-HID injection.
Windows 10 / 11 PuTTY / OpenSSH Optional conversion via PuTTYgen.
Android Termux / JuiceSSH HID injection support from a paired NFC/BLE device.
iOS Blink Shell Automatic BLE-HID injection after trusted pairing.
Note — permissions & ACL: Linux/macOS rely on POSIX file modes (700/600). Windows relies on NTFS ACLs to restrict access to SSH files (authorized_keys, administrators_authorized_keys).

Official reference — Microsoft: Key-based SSH authentication on Windows (March 10, 2025)

On March 10, 2025 Microsoft updated guidance for OpenSSH key-based authentication on Windows. The document covers creating and managing public/private key pairs and recommends modern asymmetric algorithms (Ed25519, ECDSA, RSA, DSA).

  • Published: March 10, 2025 — Microsoft Learn
  • Scope: OpenSSH key management and secure key storage on Windows
  • Tools & commands: ssh-keygen, ssh-agent, ssh-add, sshd, PowerShell automation, scp, sftp
  • Key files: authorized_keys, administrators_authorized_keys, id_ecdsa.pub, default folder C:\Users\username\.ssh\
  • Algorithms supported: Ed25519, ECDSA, RSA, DSA
  • Best practices: strong passphrase encryption, MFA where applicable, strict file permissions
  • Limitation: passphrases are typically typed or managed by software agents — an exposure vector in conventional setups
administrators_authorized_keys file: On Windows Server 2019 / 2022 / 2025, administrative keys are commonly stored in C:\ProgramData\ssh\administrators_authorized_keys. Protect this file with NTFS ACLs (Administrators & SYSTEM only). In non-localized setups use the SID S-1-5-32-544 to target Administrators.
Read Microsoft — OpenSSH key-based authentication

Sovereign extension of the model

  • Passphrases are injected from hardware (NFC / BLE-HID) — no manual typing, no clipboard exposure.
  • Private keys are protected in an OpenSSH private key format (AES-256 + hardened KDF), preventing any cleartext private key from leaving ephemeral memory.

Combined with OpenSSH on Windows, PassCypher HSM PGP converts Microsoft’s key-based flow into a hardware-anchored sovereign SSH suitable for Zero-Trust and PQ-aware postures.

PowerShell SSH

PowerShell (Windows 11 / Windows Server 2025) includes native OpenSSH integration and automation capabilities. When combined with PassCypher HSM PGP, remote operations can be automated while keeping the passphrase bound to hardware (HSM), avoiding exposure in process memory — an auditable, sovereign automation model.

Sovereign SSH

The hybrid hardware approach embodied by PassCypher HSM PGP implements Sovereign SSH: local key generation inside HSM, OpenSSH passphrase encryption (AES-256), hardened KDFs, typological key rotation — all without cloud or federated identity dependencies. This layer strengthens Microsoft OpenSSH’s trust chain with an auditable, PQ-aware hardware boundary.

Git for Windows integration — SSH key generation

PassCypher HSM PGP uses the Git for Windows environment to generate and manage SSH key pairs. Git for Windows ships ssh-keygen.exe, enabling creation of keys protected by a passphrase. By default keys are placed in the user folder:

C:\Users\\.ssh\

This default placement ensures full compatibility with PowerShell SSH and OpenSSH on Windows while allowing PassCypher to add an additional sovereign protection layer (OpenSSH passphrase encryption + HSM-based passphrase injection), producing a double barrier consistent with the zero-clear-key principle.

Functional SSH Key Separation — Authentication vs Signature

In a sovereign SSH architecture, each key must serve a clearly defined function to minimize exposure risks and enhance traceability. PassCypher HSM PGP enforces this typological separation by encrypting each private key individually within an OpenSSH private key format (AES-256 + hardened KDF), each labeled and fingerprinted according to its role:

  • Authentication key: used exclusively to establish secure SSH connections to remote servers. The private key’s passphrase is injected via BLE-HID from a PassCypher NFC HSM, entered manually, or pasted locally. PassCypher never displays or transmits this passphrase in cleartext—neither on disk nor in persistent memory—ensuring strict compliance with the Zero-Clear-Key principle. The user remains responsible for clipboard and terminal security when typing or pasting manually.
  • Signature key: used for cryptographic validation of files, scripts, or Git commits. It is encapsulated in a separate OpenSSH private key format, traceable and revocable without affecting SSH access.

This encrypted separation enables:

  • Targeted revocation without disrupting active SSH sessions (revocation date management is planned in future PassCypher SSH releases)
  • Enhanced auditability through functional labeling and local logging
  • Native DevSecOps compatibility (Git, CI/CD, signed pipelines)
💡 Best practice: each exported public key should include a typological comment (ssh-keygen -C "auth@vps" or sign@repo") to simplify management within authorized_keys files and PassCypher append-only ledgers.

Server Hardening and Best Practices for SSH Key PassCypher HSM PGP

Even with a PassCypher HSM PGP SSH key, overall security depends on server configuration. Key recommendations for a sovereign posture include:

      • Disable root login: PermitRootLogin no
      • Forbid password authentication: PasswordAuthentication no
      • Restrict SSH users: AllowUsers admin
      • Change default port: use 49152 and block 22 via firewall.
      • Configure UFW or iptables: default DROP policy with targeted exceptions.
      • Enable Fail2ban: maxretry = 3, bantime = 30 min to block brute-force attacks.
      • Activate audit logs: journalctl -u ssh with rotation and ledger tracking.
✓ Sovereignty & Compliance: This configuration aligns with NIS2 and DORA directives. It ensures complete traceability of machine access and identity control within sovereign infrastructures.

FIDO vs SSH — Two Paradigms, Two Security Postures

In the evolving cybersecurity landscape, confusion between FIDO2/WebAuthn and SSH remains common. These two systems rely on fundamentally different trust models and authentication paradigms. FIDO secures a human identity in the browser, while SSH secures a machine identity within the network. Their purposes, exposure surfaces, and sovereignty principles diverge completely.

FIDO2 / WebAuthn — Human-Centric Authentication

      • ↳ Designed to authenticate a user to a web service (browser ↔ server via WebAuthn).
      • ↳ The private key stays sealed within a hardware authenticator (YubiKey, TPM, Secure Enclave, etc.).
      • ↳ Each site or domain creates a unique key pair — ensuring identity isolation.
      • ↳ Relies on an authentication server (RP) and the browser ecosystem.
      • ↳ Requires human presence (biometric, touch, or gesture).
      • ↳ Non-exportable key: strong security but minimal portability.
      • ↳ No local audit trail or autonomous key rotation.

SSH — Machine-Centric Authentication

      • ↳ Designed to authenticate a client system to a remote host (VPS, server, or cluster).
      • ↳ Uses a persistent key, reusable across hosts according to trust policy.
      • ↳ Operates outside browsers — native SSH protocol with encrypted machine-to-machine exchanges.
      • ↳ Allows duplication and backup of keys when securely encrypted.
      • ↳ Relies on a passphrase or hardware HSM for local or injected authentication.
      • ↳ Supports native logging, rotation, and revocation controls.
      • ↳ Fully independent of cloud or third-party identity providers.

⮞ What PassCypher HSM PGP with EviSSH Brings

The SSH Key PassCypher HSM PGP solution extends classic SSH by introducing hardware security and auditability similar to FIDO2 — but within a cloudless sovereign architecture. It brings trust, portability, and compliance into a unified zero-trust framework:

      • → Local SSH key pair generation through PassCypher Engine / EviSSH.
      • → Private key encrypted in its OpenSSH private key format (AES-256 + bcrypt KDF).
      • → Key always encrypted on disk — decryption happens only in volatile memory.
      • Hardware passphrase injection via PassCypher NFC HSM or BLE-HID emulator using AES-128 CBC encryption.
      • → Optional physical presence adds a “sovereign gesture” equivalent to FIDO authentication.
      • → Full cross-platform support: Linux, macOS, Windows, Android, and iOS.
      • → No dependency on browsers, WebAuthn servers, or cloud identity accounts.
      • → Orchestrated key rotation and archival via EviSSH for industrial or defense-grade use.

Strategic Summary

      • FIDO2: Cloud-centric, non-exportable — ideal for web identity, but limited outside browsers.
      • SSH PassCypher: Sovereign, portable — ideal for servers, VPS, and critical infrastructure access.
      • PassCypher merges the hardware assurance of authenticators with the flexibility of native SSH.
      • BLE-HID injected passphrases (≥ 256 bits) ensure post-quantum symmetric resistance.
      • Local audit trails and key rotation enable off-cloud traceability.
      • Both pursue digital trust, but through opposite paths — dependence vs. sovereignty.
Comparative Insight: The AES-128 CBC encrypted BLE-HID channel of PassCypher HSM PGP provides assurance equivalent to a FIDO2 Level 2 authenticator, yet operates without browser or identity server dependency. This hybrid model — hardware-based yet cloud-free — defines PassCypher as a truly post-WebAuthn SSH solution.

Threat Model — Understanding SSH Risks

Before addressing mitigation, it is essential to understand how traditional SSH keys introduce vulnerabilities. Standard SSH connections rely on local files containing private keys. Without hardware protection, these files can be copied, exfiltrated, or reused remotely. The sovereign model deployed in SSH Key PassCypher HSM PGP neutralizes these vectors through zero-clear-key architecture and strict secret segmentation.

Identified Threats

      • Private key theft — exfiltration of ~/.ssh/id_* or cloud-synced copies.
      • Memory dump — retrieval of a key temporarily decrypted in RAM.
      • Keylogger — passphrase capture during manual keyboard entry.
      • BLE MITM — interception during insecure “Just Works” pairing.
      • Unencrypted backup — uncontrolled duplication of the container file.
      • Human error — key reuse or unintended disclosure.
Observation: Most successful attacks exploit a single factor — a private key appearing in plaintext on disk, in memory, or during passphrase input.

SSH Private Key Breaches (2021–2025) — Why OpenSSH AES-256 + HSM-injected passphrase would have prevented them

⮞ Documented Incidents

Codecov — CI Supply Chain Compromise (Jan–Apr 2021)

Lesson: Plaintext secrets in CI pipelines are a critical vulnerability.

PassCypher mitigation: OpenSSH-encrypted keys with HSM-injected passphrases would have rendered exfiltrated keys cryptographically unusable.

Ebury — Persistent SSH Backdoor Campaign (2009–2024)
  • Malware implanted in SSH daemons stole credentials from over 400,000 Linux servers.
  • ESET analysis

Lesson: Keys loaded in memory are vulnerable to persistent malware.

PassCypher mitigation: Keys are decrypted only ephemerally in RAM, never stored persistently.

GitHub — SSH Host Key Exposure (March 2023)
  • An internal SSH host key was accidentally committed to a public repository.
  • GitHub blog

Lesson: Even trusted providers can leak long-lived keys.

PassCypher mitigation: OpenSSH private key formats (id_ed25519 (ou id_rsa, selon le cas)) remain cryptographically inert if published without the HSM.

Cloudflare — Credential Leakage via Logs (2024)
  • A misconfigured worker exposed SSH-related secrets in debug logs.
  • Cloudflare blog

Lesson: Logging and debugging can inadvertently expose secrets.

PassCypher mitigation: Passphrases are injected via BLE-HID and never typed or logged.

OpenSSH — CVE-2025-26465 & CVE-2025-26466 (Feb 2025)

Lesson: Protocol-level flaws can bypass host key trust.

PassCypher mitigation: Host key pinning and hardware-bound passphrase injection neutralize MitM vectors.

GitHub Actions — CI/CD Secret Exposure (Q2 2025)
  • Multiple open-source projects committed `.env` files containing SSH private keys.

Lesson: Plaintext key reuse across environments remains widespread.

PassCypher mitigation: Encrypted key containers (id_ed25519 (ou id_rsa, selon le cas)) are unusable without the physical HSM and injected passphrase.

Operational Conclusion

None of the compromised keys in these incidents were protected by OpenSSH native encryption or hardware-injected passphrases. Each breach exploited plaintext exposure — in scripts, logs, memory, or repositories.

PassCypher HSM PGP Architecture:

  • Private keys are always encrypted at rest (AES-256 OpenSSH)
  • Decryption occurs only ephemerally in RAM
  • Passphrases are injected via sovereign hardware — never typed or logged
  • Even if the encrypted key is exfiltrated, it remains cryptographically inert without the HSM

This model neutralizes every known attack vector used in SSH key compromises to date.

AI-Assisted Breach Vectors — and Why Hardware Sovereignty Matters

Short summary: Since 2021, multiple public incidents have exposed a recurring vulnerability: plaintext secrets or private keys accessible in CI pipelines, memory, or logs. Today, AI-assisted IDEs and Copilot-like assistants extend that exposure surface by indexing local workspace data, terminal outputs, and editor buffers. When an AI assistant can read or summarize visible code or system logs, any plaintext secret becomes an implicit exfiltration vector.

Documented, verifiable examples

      • Codecov supply-chain compromise (2021) — CI scripts leaked plaintext credentials. Hardware encryption (OpenSSH AES-256 + HSM passphrase injection) would have rendered them useless.
      • Ebury SSH backdoors (2009 – 2024) — malware stole SSH keys in memory. Zero-clear-key workflows prevent such exfiltration.
      • Public key leaks (GitHub, 2023 – 2024) — accidental commits of secrets. OpenSSH-encrypted private key files remain inert if exposed.

AI / IDE assistants — new attack surface

Modern code assistants (GitHub Copilot, Amazon CodeWhisperer, etc.) scan active projects and terminals to provide context-aware suggestions. If plaintext secrets exist in that context, they may be processed or exposed inadvertently. Independent audits and vendor advisories highlight potential privacy and data-leak risks when assistants index developer environments without isolation.

Practical takeaway: Any assistant able to read your editor or terminal becomes an additional channel for secret exposure — maliciously or accidentally.

Why hardware sovereignty eliminates this risk

      • Private keys remain sealed in OpenSSH AES-256 containers.
      • Decryption requires a hardware-held passphrase injected via BLE-HID or NFC.
      • No plaintext key or passphrase ever appears on screen, disk, or in clipboard memory.

Even if an AI assistant, IDE plugin, or CI process is compromised, it cannot extract usable secrets — because none exist in cleartext. PassCypher HSM PGP enforces this “zero-clear-key” model from key generation to authentication.

Summary: AI-assisted development expands the attack surface, but hardware-anchored encryption closes it. Sovereign HSM workflows guarantee that sensitive data never enters the scope of software or AI visibility.

Protection Mechanisms — OpenSSH, KDF, and BLE-HID Layers

After defining the threat surface, PassCypher HSM PGP establishes a defense-in-depth model built on three pillars: robust asymmetric encryption, hardened key derivation, and secure physical passphrase injection. Together, these mechanisms ensure that no private key can be extracted — even from a compromised endpoint.

OpenSSH private key format and Integrity Assurance

The private key is stored directly in OpenSSH’s native encrypted format (AES-256 + bcrypt).

      • Encryption: AES-256 (CTR, CBC, or GCM depending on configuration)
      • Integrity: Active MDC (Modification Detection Code).
      • Unique salt: generated by the engine during initial encryption.
      • Optional compression: reduces memory footprint and transmission load.

Key Derivation Function (KDF) and Symmetric Resistance

The OpenSSH encryption key derives from an HSM-generated passphrase:

      • bcrypt: default mode (m=512MB, t=3, p=4) hardened against GPU attacks.
      • PBKDF2 fallback: 250,000 SHA-512 iterations when bcrypt is unavailable.
      • Post-quantum awareness: ≥256-bit entropy ensures symmetric strength equivalent to 2¹²⁸ under Grover’s bound.
⚠ Note: This does not make the system post-quantum proof. Only PQC asymmetric primitives such as CRYSTALS-Dilithium or Kyber will offer long-term quantum resilience.

BLE-HID Injection Channel — Passphrase Security at the Hardware Layer

The passphrase travels through a Bluetooth Low Energy HID channel emulating a hardware keyboard.

      • Secure pairing mode: Secure Connections enforced with numeric authentication (PIN or code), bonding activated for persistence.
      • Communication encryption: AES-128 CBC applied at HID application level.
      • First AES-128 key stored in a secure enclave embedded in the Bluetooth keyboard emulator.
      • Second AES-128 key stored inside Android Keystore (Android ≥ 10) managed by the PassCypher NFC HSM app.
      • Residual risk: a MITM vulnerability can appear if “Just Works” mode is allowed — this mode is strictly forbidden under sovereign policy.
✓ Sovereign Countermeasures: Always enforce Secure Connections, enable bonding, verify BLE key hash integrity, and purge paired devices after use in sensitive environments.
Summary: The combination of OpenSSH + bcrypt + BLE-HID AES-128 forms a coherent ecosystem. Secrets never leave the encrypted perimeter, and the injection vector remains physically controlled.

Rotation and Revocation — SSH Key PassCypher HSM PGP Lifecycle Management

Within sovereign SSH authentication infrastructures, key rotation ensures continuity and traceability without exposing secrets. Unlike simple rotation commands, SSH Key PassCypher HSM PGP follows a four-step operational process: regenerate, deploy, validate, revoke. This method fully preserves the zero-clear-key principle — private keys stay encrypted at rest and are decrypted only in volatile memory.

User Transparency: All operations occur through the PassCypher HSM PGP web extension. EviEngine orchestrates local actions between EviSSH, Git, and PassCypher, performing every step client-side — without hidden or remote processes.

1) Regeneration — Creating a New Sovereign SSH Key Pair

From the integrated EviSSH interface, users regenerate SSH key pairs through Git. The PassCypher Engine automatically encapsulates and encrypts them.

      • Select the algorithm — ed25519 for resilience and interoperability, or rsa-4096 for specific requirements.
      • Assign a distinct label (e.g., pc-hsm-ssh-2025-10) to ensure traceability and simplify future revocation.
      • The private key is encapsulated in an OpenSSH AES-256 encrypted container (id_ed25519 or id_rsa) using a hardened KDF (bcrypt).
      • The public key (*.pub) is generated with a unique comment identifier for use in authorized_keys.
💡 Tip: Every operation runs transparently within PassCypher HSM PGP — no manual entry, no plaintext exposure.

2) Controlled Deployment — Adding Without Downtime

Append the new .pub key to ~/.ssh/authorized_keys on each server without removing the previous one.

# Append-only deployment (port 49152, Debian user)
scp -P 49152 ~/.ssh/id_ed25519_2025-10.pub debian@IPVPS:/tmp/newkey.pub
ssh -p 49152 debian@IPVPS 'umask 077; mkdir -p ~/.ssh; touch ~/.ssh/authorized_keys 
&& grep -qxF -f /tmp/newkey.pub ~/.ssh/authorized_keys || cat /tmp/newkey.pub >> ~/.ssh/authorized_keys 
&& rm -f /tmp/newkey.pub && chmod 600 ~/.ssh/authorized_keys'

3) Validation — Canary Phase

Test connectivity with the new key. The passphrase is injected securely via BLE-HID from the HSM.

ssh -o IdentitiesOnly=yes -i ~/.ssh/id_ed25519_2025-10 -p 49152 debian@IPVPS

Maintain both keys for 24–72 hours to ensure seamless operational continuity.

4) Revocation — Retiring the Old Key

Remove the previous key entry using its label comment.

# Remove key by label match
ssh -p 49152 debian@IPVPS "sed -i.bak '/ pc-hsm-ssh-2025-04$/d' ~/.ssh/authorized_keys"

Repeat across all target hosts. Archive authorized_keys.bak for forensic traceability.

Audit Ledger — Append-Only Record

Maintain a timestamped ledger of key lifecycle operations.

mkdir -p ~/audit && touch ~/audit/ssh-keys-ledger.tsv
printf "%stNEWt%st%sn" "$(date -Iseconds)" 
"$(ssh-keygen -lf ~/.ssh/id_ed25519_2025-10.pub | awk '{print $2}')" "pc-hsm-ssh-2025-10" 
>> ~/audit/ssh-keys-ledger.tsv
printf "%stREVOKEt%st%sn" "$(date -Iseconds)" 
"$(ssh-keygen -lf ~/.ssh/id_ed25519_2025-04.pub | awk '{print $2}')" "pc-hsm-ssh-2025-04" 
>> ~/audit/ssh-keys-ledger.tsv
Summary: Key rotation in PassCypher HSM PGP is procedural, not command-based. You regenerate a new key pair, deploy it, validate access, and retire the old one — all logged locally and executed via the PassCypher extension.

Multi-Host Orchestration Script — Without Third-Party Tools

#!/usr/bin/env bash
set -euo pipefail
PORT=49152
USER=debian
NEWPUB="$HOME/.ssh/id_ed25519_2025-10.pub"
OLD_LABEL="pc-hsm-ssh-2025-04"

while read -r HOST; do
  echo "[*] $HOST :: install new key"
  scp -P "$PORT" "$NEWPUB" "$USER@$HOST:/tmp/newkey.pub"
  ssh -p "$PORT" "$USER@$HOST" '
    umask 077
    mkdir -p ~/.ssh
    touch ~/.ssh/authorized_keys
    grep -qxF -f /tmp/newkey.pub ~/.ssh/authorized_keys || cat /tmp/newkey.pub >> ~/.ssh/authorized_keys
    rm -f /tmp/newkey.pub
    chmod 600 ~/.ssh/authorized_keys
  '
done < hosts.txt

echo "[] Validate the new key on all hosts, then retire the old key:"
while read -r HOST; do
  echo "[] $HOST :: remove old key by label"
  ssh -p "$PORT" "$USER@$HOST" "sed -i.bak '/ ${OLD_LABEL}$/d' ~/.ssh/authorized_keys"
done < hosts.txt
Operational Alert: Keep a fallback access channel (bastion or console) until all hosts validate the new key. Avoid premature deletion.

Sovereign Methods for Passphrase or Password Recovery

PassCypher HSM PGP provides several sovereign recovery mechanisms for SSH authentication secrets. Each method follows the zero-clear-key rule and adapts to operational contexts:

      • Encrypted QR Code (GIF/PNG) — Import a passphrase without display. Ideal for printed backups or planned rotations. → Injects directly into secure input fields.
      • NFC Retrieval from PassCypher HSM — Contactless recovery from sovereign hardware (EviKey or EviPass). → Automatic encrypted injection through BLE-HID channel.
      • Bluetooth or USB Keyboard Emulator (BLE-HID) — AES-128 CBC encrypted keystroke emulation. Works on Linux, macOS, Windows, Android, and iOS, even air-gapped. → Leaves no persistent trace.
      • Manual Memory Entry — Expert-only option: direct entry in secure pinentry. → Sovereign if no autocomplete or logging is active.
PassCypher recovery — import an encrypted QR to restore a passphrase or password without screen exposure
✪ Sovereign Recovery — restore passphrase/password from encrypted QR without screen display before SSH key rotation or revocation.

Recommended Procedure — Restore a Passphrase from a QR Backup

  1. Open the Recovery interface in PassCypher, preferably offline.
  2. Import the QR image (GIF/PNG). Decryption runs locally with no network connection.
  3. Select the usage mode: BLE-HID injection or ephemeral clipboard (auto-clear).
  4. Validate, then purge clipboard memory. Log the action (timestamp, hash, QR source).

Warning: Never paste a passphrase into editors or terminals. Use only ephemeral, auditable input methods.

Summary: PassCypher HSM PGP provides multiple sovereign SSH authentication recovery paths, each compliant with zero-clear-key design. Users can choose based on mobility, auditability, resilience, or maximum sovereignty.

Advanced CLI FIFO Example — For Expert Linux Operators

Use this method only when BLE-HID is unavailable. The FIFO pipe never writes passphrases to disk and prevents shell history leaks.
# 1. Create a secure FIFO
mkfifo /tmp/pc_pass.fifo
chmod 600 /tmp/pc_pass.fifo

# 2. Decrypt via FIFO without storing passphrase
gpg --batch --yes --passphrase-fd 0 --decrypt --output ~/.ssh/id_ed25519 ~/.ssh/id_ed25519.key.gpg < /tmp/pc_pass.fifo & # 3. Write the passphrase transiently, then destroy FIFO printf '%s' "THE_PASSPHRASE" > /tmp/pc_pass.fifo
shred -u /tmp/pc_pass.fifo || rm -f /tmp/pc_pass.fifo

CLI Security Notes:

  • Never store passphrases in environment variables or shell history.
  • Prefer BLE-HID injection via pinentry to avoid process or clipboard exposure.
  • Record each recovery event in the audit ledger (key fingerprint, host, operator, timestamp).

Operational Flow — From Generation to Authentication (SSH Key PassCypher HSM PGP)

The operational flow defines how PassCypher Engine, PassCypher HSM PGP, and optionally the PassCypher NFC HSM with its BLE-HID keyboard emulator collaborate to generate, protect, transport, and authenticate an SSH key whose private component remains encrypted and is only unlocked ephemerally in RAM.
This architecture forms the backbone of the sovereign SSH authentication lifecycle.

⮞ One-Line Summary: Generate → protect private key with passphrase → export .pub → securely store encrypted key → inject passphrase (via PassCypher NFC HSM over BLE-HID or manual input) → decrypt in RAM → SSH connect → immediate purge.

Detailed Steps (Flow)

Generation (EviSSH Integrated in PassCypher HSM PGP, Orchestrated by PassCypher Engine)

▸ The user launches PassCypher Engine or the extension → “SSH Key Generator.”
▸ Selects algorithm (ed25519 recommended).
▸ Defines a label and passphrase method (generated by the HSM or user-specified).
▸ Result: key pair → id_ed25519 (OpenSSH private key encrypted with passphrase) + id_ed25519.pub (public key).
EviSSH suggests secure storage (local folder, EviKey, encrypted NAS). No automatic unlock is performed.

Export & Secure Storage

▸ Export only the public key (.pub) to the server (e.g., OVH, Scaleway, etc.).
▸ Store the encrypted private key (OpenSSH PEM block protected by passphrase) securely: on EviKey NFC, encrypted NAS, or USB drive. The file remains encrypted at rest.

Client Preparation Before Use

▸ Copy the encrypted private key to a controlled directory on the client (e.g., ~/secure/id_ed25519).
▸ Optionally, mount a tmpfs to avoid disk persistence during temporary decryption:

sudo mkdir -p /mnt/ssh-tmp && sudo mount -t tmpfs -o mode=700 tmpfs /mnt/ssh-tmp

▸ Disable or encrypt swap: sudo swapoff -a.

Passphrase Injection (PassCypher NFC HSM → BLE-HID)

▸ The user triggers passphrase injection by bringing the PassCypher NFC HSM near the smartphone or pairing the BLE-HID if not yet bonded.
Security Note — never allow “Just-Works” pairing. Require Secure Connections (Numeric Comparison or PIN) and enforce bonding.
▸ The BLE channel transmits encrypted packets (AES-128 CBC). The device injects the passphrase as a virtual keyboard input — no manual typing.

Ephemeral Decryption in RAM

▸ The OpenSSH prompt requests the passphrase; PassCypher BLE-HID injects it securely.
▸ The private key decrypts only in volatile memory for immediate use.
▸ The id_ed25519 or id_rsa container remains encrypted and intact.
▸ For temporary files, enforce chmod 600 and avoid disk writes when possible.

SSH Authentication

▸ SSH uses the decrypted key in memory:

ssh -i /path/to/id_ed25519 -p 49152 user@IPVPS

▸ Once authenticated, purge the key immediately from memory.

Purge & Post-Usage

▸ If a temporary file was used, delete and unmount it:

shred -u /mnt/ssh-tmp/id_ed25519 || rm -f /mnt/ssh-tmp/id_ed25519
sudo umount /mnt/ssh-tmp

▸ Remove SSH agent sessions: ssh-add -D and eval "$(ssh-agent -k)".
▸ Reactivate swap if needed: sudo swapon -a.

Critical Security Points & Recommendations

  • Never use “Just-Works” BLE pairing — enforce Secure Connections, numeric verification, and bonding.
  • The private key always stays encrypted; only ephemeral RAM decryption occurs.
  • ssh-agent extends exposure time — limit lifetime and purge after use.
  • Disable swap and prevent core dumps: sudo swapoff -a, ulimit -c 0.
  • Enable audit logging for key rotations and passphrase injections.
  • Use hardened cryptography: bcrypt or PBKDF2 with strong parameters and AES-256 encryption. Random ≥256-bit passphrases ensure post-quantum-aware resilience.

Quick Command Examples

# Example: temporary RAM decryption
sudo mkdir -p /mnt/ssh-tmp && sudo mount -t tmpfs -o mode=700 tmpfs /mnt/ssh-tmp
cp /media/evikey/id_ed25519 /mnt/ssh-tmp/id_ed25519
ssh -i /mnt/ssh-tmp/id_ed25519 -p 49152 user@vps.example.com
shred -u /mnt/ssh-tmp/id_ed25519 || rm -f /mnt/ssh-tmp/id_ed25519
sudo umount /mnt/ssh-tmp
💡Final Note: This workflow prioritizes the protection of the private key — encrypted at rest, unlocked only in volatile memory, and controlled through hardware-backed passphrase injection. Security still depends on host integrity and BLE pairing quality — avoid “Just-Works” mode.

EviSSH — Integrated Management & Orchestration

EviSSH is not an external utility but an integrated part of PassCypher HSM PGP. It automates SSH key generation, rotation, and management locally while maintaining universal compatibility across Linux, macOS, and Windows. It operates under EviEngine, orchestrating system-level actions with no cloud or third-party dependency — ensuring trusted and sovereign SSH key management.

Main Capabilities

      • SSH Key Generation via Git, directly within the PassCypher HSM PGP interface.
      • Automatic Encryption of the private key into an OpenSSH private key format (AES-256 + bcrypt).
      • Sovereign Storage on local drives, EviKey NFC HSM, or encrypted NAS devices.
      • Simple Rotation: creation, deployment, and revocation without handling plaintext keys.
      • Full Interoperability: OpenSSH-compatible keys across all major platforms.

Security and Hardware Integration

      • Passphrase Injection via PassCypher NFC HSM using an AES-128 CBC encrypted BLE-HID channel.
      • Optional Hardware Storage on EviKey NFC HSM — encrypted containers remain inaccessible without the defined passphrase.
💡Note: Unlike server-based systems, EviSSH performs no remote decryption or centralized key handling. All operations remain local, auditable, and sovereign — compliant with digital sovereignty standards.

Sovereign Use Case — PassCypher HSM PGP × PassCypher NFC HSM & BLE-HID

This scenario illustrates a full sovereign SSH authentication use case across multi-OS and multi-site environments:

  • PassCypher HSM PGP generates and encapsulates SSH pairs inside an OpenSSH AES-256 container hardened with bcrypt.
  • PassCypher NFC HSM stores and secures the sovereign passphrase, enabling encrypted BLE-HID injection on any compatible system.
  • ✓ The Bluetooth HID emulator acts as an encrypted virtual keyboard (AES-128 CBC), injecting passphrases locally without manual input — eliminating keylogger risk.
  • Example: an administrator connects to a Debian VPS from macOS or Android by simply tapping the PassCypher NFC HSM. The passphrase is securely injected over BLE-HID and decrypted in RAM only.
  • Operational Benefit: portable, audit-ready, and cloud-independent sovereign SSH authentication across Linux, macOS, Windows, Android, and iOS.

This integration — PassCypher HSM PGP × PassCypher NFC HSM & BLE-HID — embodies Freemindtronic’s zero-clear-key model:
no private key ever exists in plaintext on disk or network, and access requires both the physical HSM and secure BLE pairing.

Key Insights

  • PassCypher HSM PGP → zero private key exposure, even temporarily.
  • AES-128 BLE-HID injection → neutralizes keyloggers and keyboard injection attacks.
  • OpenSSH AES-256 + bcrypt → robust symmetric defense, post-quantum-ready posture.
  • Rotation, audit, timestamped ledger → complete traceability of machine identities.
  • EviSSH orchestration → multi-HSM sovereign management, no cloud or third-party dependency.

Weak Signals — Emerging Trends in Sovereign SSH Security

⮞ Weak Signals to Watch

  • Rapid adoption of BLE-HID workflows across multi-OS DevSecOps environments.
  • Early experiments with hardware-accelerated bcrypt KDF inside next-gen HSMs.
  • Growth of OpenPGP v6 projects embedding hybrid PQC-ready modules.
  • Increasing NIS2/DORA regulatory pressure for mandatory machine-access logging.
  • A visible convergence between SSH, FIDO2, and PQC in emerging sovereign access architectures.

What We Haven’t Covered — Beyond SSH Key PassCypher HSM PGP

⧉ Areas Not Covered in This Chronicle

This article focused on sovereign SSH authentication for VPS access and secure key lifecycle management.
However, several advanced topics remain for future deep-dives:

  • Direct integration into CI/CD pipelines and automated DevOps flows.
  • Upcoming FIDO2 extensions and hybrid post-quantum support.
  • Automated BLE security audits on mobile systems.
  • Real-time inter-HSM synchronization for distributed infrastructures.

These aspects will be detailed in the upcoming series Tech Fixes & Security Solutions.

FAQ — SSH Key PassCypher HSM PGP

A Hybrid HSM for Sovereign SSH Key Management

PassCypher HSM PGP is a hybrid hardware/software security module by Freemindtronic.
It generates, encrypts, and protects SSH and OpenPGP keys using AES-256 encryption and memory-hardened KDFs (PBKDF2 or bcrypt).
Through its NFC and BLE-HID interfaces, passphrases are injected securely without ever exposing private keys — ensuring a zero-trust and sovereign SSH authentication posture.

Secure Duplication Without Losing Sovereignty

Yes. The encrypted id_ed25519 or id_rsa file can be copied across multiple sovereign media (EviKey NFC, encrypted NAS, printed QR).
It remains unusable without the matching passphrase and KDF — ensuring secure SSH key storage even under physical breach.

Cryptographic Resilience in a PQ-Aware Context

A random ≥256-bit passphrase combined with a hardened KDF and AES-256 encryption provides strong symmetric resistance, even against Grover-based quantum attacks.
However, it does not replace PQC algorithms for asymmetric operations.
This model offers robust, yet transitional, post-quantum-aware SSH security.

Sovereign Recovery Without Cloud Dependency

If the encrypted key file (id_ed25519 or id_rsa) was backed up — via printed QR, EviKey NFC, or encrypted media — it can be restored.
The passphrase injection via PassCypher NFC HSM enables full recovery without external servers or cloud reliance.

Local Use Only — Maintain Zero-Clear-Key Posture

While `ssh-agent` offers convenience, it increases memory exposure.
It’s safer to rely on direct BLE-HID passphrase injection — ensuring ephemeral decryption only in RAM and compliance with zero-clear-key SSH architecture.

Local Operations, Zero Private-Key Export

Yes. Sensitive operations (signing, partial decryption) execute directly inside the HSM engine.
The private key never leaves the secure process, ensuring full hardware-anchored SSH authentication.

Incompatible with Sovereign SSH Key Architecture

Agent forwarding conflicts with the zero-trust SSH access model.
Passphrases and private keys must never transit remotely.
Keep SSH-agent sessions strictly local, favoring hardware injection over forwarding.

Best Practices for Secure BLE Pairing

Even with Secure Connections Only, downgrade risks exist on some platforms.
To mitigate them:

      • Always require numeric-code authentication (6-digit PIN or comparison).
      • Enforce bonding and store pairing keys securely (Secure Enclave / Android Keystore).
      • Ensure BLE-HID channels use AES-128 CBC encryption.
      • Regularly review paired device lists and revoke unused entries.

This ensures true end-to-end BLE encryption for sovereign SSH workflows.

Multi-Device Backups with Full Sovereignty

Yes — if the passphrase and KDF remain confidential.
The encrypted key file can reside on EviKey NFC, NAS, USB drive, or printed QR.
This enables secure cold backups with zero cloud exposure.

100% Offline Operation — Full Sovereign Mode

Yes. All operations (generation, encryption, injection, rotation) are performed locally, with no network connection required.
Ideal for air-gapped SSH environments or classified infrastructures.

Recommended SSH Key Lifecycle Management

Key rotation every 6–12 months is recommended for administrative access.
PassCypher automates this through its four-step rotation process — each event logged in the local audit ledger for compliance verification.

Full Interoperability with OpenSSH and Industry Standards

Yes. Keys generated by PassCypher follow OpenSSH format standards.
They can be used in PuTTY, Git Bash, Termux, or native OpenSSH clients — maintaining multi-OS SSH key interoperability.

Real-World Key Theft Techniques & Incidents

Several incident reports and security analyses reveal how SSH private keys have been compromised:

      • Malware / Rootkit extraction: Once an attacker achieves code execution or root privileges, they can exfiltrate key files (commonly stored in ~/.ssh). Notable examples include Careto and Windigo malware.
      • Memory scraping of ssh-agent: An attacker with root or debugging privileges can dump memory and recover decrypted private keys or agent cache. > “If you can run code as root, it’s game over”
      • Accidental public exposure (git commits): A well-known case: a deploy SSH private key got committed via a CI/CD auto-format script.
      • Malicious packages stealing credentials: Some npm / PyPI trojan packages have been observed harvesting SSH keys from developers’ workstations. :contentReference
      • Fault / side-channel recovery: Researchers recovered SSH private keys from ephemeral computational errors during protocol execution over multiple captures.
      • Insider threats or misconfiguration: In compromised SSH host reports, malicious keys added to `authorized_keys` allowed lateral movement.

These cases illustrate high-risk attack vectors such as memory dumps, keylogging bypass, supply chain trojans, protocol-level flaws, and insider injection.
Incorporating defense against them is critical for any robust SSH key architecture.

SSH Protocol Weaknesses & Attacks

Yes — recent academic work shows that subtle protocol-level flaws can be exploited:

      • Terrapin Attack (prefix truncation): Allows partial truncation of encrypted SSH packets during handshake, enabling attacker to downgrade public-key authentication or hijack sessions.
      • Strict KEX violations: Some SSH server implementations do not enforce the “strict key exchange” mode, making them vulnerable to handshake manipulations or rogue session takeover.
      • Weak randomness or biased nonce reuse: In ECDSA or deterministic signature schemes, poorly generated nonces or biases may leak private key bits. A recent study revealed even PuTTY keys became recoverable from just 58 signatures.

These attacks underscore the importance of using hardened, current SSH versions, enforcing latest mitigations (strict KEX), and avoiding signature schemes with weak nonce behaviors.

Public Key Theft is Harmless (if private key and passphrase are safe)

No — possessing the public key alone does not enable SSH login. The public key is, by design, meant to be shared.

However, public-key knowledge can aid an attacker in:

      • Performing cryptanalysis or side-channel attacks if private key generation was flawed.
      • Launching chosen-ciphertext or protocol downgrade attacks — e.g., leveraging protocol flaws like Terrapin to force weaker algorithms.

Therefore, the core protection lies in safeguarding the private key and controlling its exposure.

Memory & Agent Exposure — Key Risk in Conventional SSH

Using `ssh-agent` or unencrypted key caching often increases exposure risk because:

      • The agent stores decrypted keys in memory (RAM), which can be dumped by a local attacker with high privileges.
      • Agent forwarding can propagate that risk across hops if an intermediary is compromised.
      • Even if the key is encrypted at rest, once loaded into agent, subsequent use is vulnerable.

Thus, many advanced architectures avoid persistent agent usage, instead relying on ephemeral decryption and non-forwardable injected secrets.

Supply Chain & Library Backdoor Risks

Yes — indirect attacks via compromised software are a known vector:

      • Backdoored compression library (XZ Utils): In 2024, a malicious backdoor was injected into the `xz` utility which, under specific conditions, could hijack `sshd` authentication to allow remote root compromise.
      • Trojanized OSS dependencies: Attackers may infiltrate software libraries used in buildchains or CI/CD to introduce key leakage routines or drift into binaries.

To defend, one must enforce supply chain assurance, reproducible builds, binary verification, and minimal trusted dependencies.

Real incidents and evidence

Yes. See documented cases and official reports in the section Documented SSH / Credential Breaches.

Glossary — SSH Key PassCypher HSM PGP

SSH Key Pair

A cryptographic identity composed of a public and a private key. PassCypher generates them locally using Ed25519, ECDSA, or RSA.
The private key is encrypted directly by OpenSSH using a passphrase (bcrypt KDF + AES-256), while the public key is exported in OpenSSH format for use in authorized_keys or administrators_authorized_keys.

Authorized Keys

OpenSSH file used to validate public keys during authentication. On Linux it resides under ~/.ssh/authorized_keys; on Windows, under C:\Users\username\.ssh\. PassCypher supports hardware-based injection into this file.

administrators_authorized_keys

File used by Windows Server 2019 / 2022 / 2025 for administrative SSH access, located in C:\ProgramData\ssh\. It must be protected by NTFS ACLs allowing access only to Administrators and SYSTEM. The SID S-1-5-32-544 corresponds to the Administrators group.

SSH Key Management

Lifecycle of key identities — generation, encryption, injection, rotation, and recovery — performed locally without cloud dependency.
PassCypher manages OpenSSH-encrypted keys and injects passphrases via NFC or BLE-HID hardware channels.

SSH Key Rotation

Lifecycle of SSH credentials (generate → deploy → validate → revoke). Managed by PassCypher’s append-only ledger for full traceability across Ed25519, ECDSA, and RSA formats.

SSH Key Recovery

Sovereign restoration of encrypted SSH keys or passphrases using QR codes, NFC HSM, or BLE-HID injection — without plaintext exposure, fully compatible with OpenSSH workflows.

SSH Key Injection

Hardware-based transmission of encrypted passphrases via BLE-HID or NFC.
Reduces interception risks during authentication, compatible with scp, sftp, and OpenSSH clients across Windows and Linux.

SSH Key Security

Best practices for SSH hardening: AES-256 encryption, bcrypt KDF, local key generation, audit trails, and enforcement of zero-clear-key.
Avoids unsupported directives (AuthorizedKeysCommand) on Windows.

SSH-Agent / ssh-add

Volatile memory service that temporarily caches decrypted keys. PassCypher replaces this with hardware injection and ephemeral decryption, ensuring no keys persist in memory.

ssh-keygen

Standard OpenSSH utility for key generation. PassCypher automates it through its EviEngine, producing OpenSSH-native private keys encrypted by passphrase, and OpenSSH-compatible public keys.

Public Key Authentication

Login mechanism based on asymmetric cryptography.
PassCypher enhances it with hardware-based passphrase delivery, sovereign audit logging, and offline key generation (no OpenSSH passphrase encryption).

Fingerprint

SHA-256 hash uniquely identifying an SSH key. Used for authenticity verification and recorded in PassCypher’s audit ledger. Matches ssh-keygen -lf output.

Tmpfs

RAM-based filesystem used for temporary decryption, ensuring no persistent storage of decrypted keys.

Zero-Clear-Key

Freemindtronic’s sovereign principle: private keys never exist unencrypted on disk or network.
Decryption occurs only in volatile memory (RAM).

Secure VPS Access

Remote server authentication using locally generated and encrypted OpenSSH keys.
Removes the need for SSH agent forwarding, fully offline and cross-platform.

SSH Key Audit Trail

Append-only chronological record of SSH key events — generation, rotation, revocation, recovery — providing local forensic traceability.

ACL (Access Control List)

Windows NTFS security model defining granular file access. PassCypher enforces restrictive ACLs on SSH key files (authorized_keys, administrators_authorized_keys) to align with Microsoft OpenSSH guidelines.

SID (Security Identifier)

Windows internal numeric identifier representing users or groups. The SID S-1-5-32-544 designates the Administrators group. Used by PassCypher to assign access in non-localized systems.

Git for Windows

Windows environment bundling ssh-keygen.exe and OpenSSH utilities. Used by PassCypher to generate SSH key pairs natively and store them in C:\Users\\.ssh\, maintaining compatibility with PowerShell SSH.

PowerShell SSH

Native Windows 11 / Server 2025 module allowing SSH automation through PowerShell. Integrated with PassCypher HSM for secure remote execution while retaining passphrase protection inside hardware.

Sovereign SSH

Freemindtronic’s sovereign model for SSH identity management — local generation, OpenSSH AES-256 encryption, bcrypt KDF, typological key rotation, and auditability, fully cloud-independent and sovereignty-compliant.

Windows Server 2025 / 2022 / 2019

Microsoft server platforms with native OpenSSH integration. PassCypher extends their capabilities with hardware-based passphrase management and OpenSSH-native key encryption for sovereign compliance.

OpenSSH for Windows

Microsoft-integrated implementation of OpenSSH. Fully compatible with PassCypher’s sovereign modules, enhancing key-based authentication via secure BLE-HID/NFC passphrase delivery.

💡 Note: This glossary is part of Freemindtronic’s sovereign terminology corpus.
It ensures semantic alignment across the PassCypher, EviKey, and DataShielder ecosystems, supporting technical precision and sovereign consistency within this chronicle.

Strategic Outlook — Toward Post-Quantum Sovereign SSH Authentication

The SSH Key PassCypher HSM PGP framework anticipates the next evolution of secure access: a convergence between hardware sovereignty, quantum-resilient cryptography, and zero-trust architectures. By merging hardware-backed SSH authentication, memory-hardened encryption, and physical key injection, PassCypher bridges classical cryptography with future PQC-hybrid designs.

Future versions will introduce:

      • Hybrid primitives (ed25519 + CRYSTALS-Dilithium) for quantum-safe SSH signatures.
      • BLE 5.3 channels with AES-256 GCM encryption.
      • Native signed-ledger integration using embedded blockchain audit trails.

Until PQC becomes mainstream, the zero-clear-key model remains the strongest defense: never let a private key exist outside encrypted volatile memory.