Category Archives: Technologies

CryptPeer messagerie P2P WebRTC : appels directs chiffrés de bout en bout

Illustration de CryptPeer messagerie P2P WebRTC montrant un appel vidéo sécurisé chiffré de bout en bout entre plusieurs utilisateurs.

La messagerie P2P WebRTC sécurisée constitue le fondement technique et souverain de la communication directe chiffrée de bout en bout de CryptPeer. Cette synergie redéfinit aujourd’hui l’architecture même des échanges numériques. À la croisée de l’ingénierie réseau, de la sécurité des protocoles et de la cryptographie appliquée, cette chronique montre comment CryptPeer s’appuie sur le modèle pair-à-pair pour instaurer une maîtrise locale totale du flux, sans serveur intermédiaire tiers et sans dépendance structurelle aux plateformes cloud, au plus via un relais local auto-hébergé qui ne fait que transmettre du trafic chiffré : une messagerie chiffrée sans cloud, 100 % navigateur, orientée souveraineté numérique.

Les technologies P2P et WebRTC ne constituent pas seulement un enjeu de performance ou de confidentialité : elles incarnent une rupture fondamentale avec les systèmes centralisés, en rendant possible un dialogue technique où chaque utilisateur devient l’unique détenteur du secret, du canal et de sa propre exposition. En ce sens, la communication directe n’est pas un simple choix d’architecture, mais une affirmation doctrinale : celle de prouver la souveraineté par la conception.

Résumé express — Ce qu’il faut retenir

Lecture rapide ≈ 2 min — WebRTC et le modèle pair-à-pair constituent l’ossature de la messagerie P2P WebRTC sécurisée : une messagerie P2P chiffrée de bout en bout, indépendante de tout serveur cloud tiers, qui assure une communication directe entre navigateurs. CryptPeer s’appuie sur cette architecture pour établir un canal souverain entre navigateurs, où chaque utilisateur conserve la maîtrise locale du flux, des clés et de sa propre exposition.

Principe — Connexion directe entre pairs

La connexion direct-to-direct remplace le schéma centralisé traditionnel. Le flux ne transite plus par une plateforme tierce : il est négocié, chiffré et maintenu exclusivement entre les pairs. Cette approche réduit la surface d’attaque, limite la collecte involontaire et neutralise la dépendance structurelle aux infrastructures cloud.

Fondement — Les piliers techniques de WebRTC

WebRTC fonde la communication temps réel sur un triptyque — négociation SDP, traversée NAT via ICE/STUN/TURN et chiffrement DTLS-SRTP. Le DataChannel complète le dispositif avec un canal P2P robuste pour les messages, métadonnées et transferts binaires.

Constat — Performances et relais optionnels

Dans 85 à 90 % des cas, la connexion directe s’établit sans aucun relais, assurant une latence minimale et un contrôle total. Dans les autres cas, un nœud relais optionnel, portable et auto-hébergé peut uniquement acheminer du trafic chiffré de bout en bout. Le serveur de signalisation n’est utilisé qu’avant la connexion et ne conserve aucun état. Une fois le lien établi, le chemin de communication reste intégralement sous le contrôle des utilisateurs.

Enjeu — Souveraineté par la maîtrise locale

Cette architecture n’est pas un simple choix technique. Elle déplace le centre de gravité de la confiance — du cloud vers l’utilisateur — et rappelle que la souveraineté s’exerce par la maîtrise locale : cryptographie de bout en bout, absence de stockage en clair sur des serveurs et autonomie réseau.

⮞ En résumé : CryptPeer démontre que la messagerie P2P WebRTC n’est pas une solution de repli, mais une nouvelle norme de communication directe, chiffrée et indépendante des plateformes cloud, où la confiance se prouve par le design et non par la délégation.

Paramètres de lecture

Résumé express : ≈ 2 min
Résumé avancé : ≈ 7 min
Chronique complète : ≈ 32 min
Date de publication : 2025-11-14
Dernière mise à jour : 2025-11-14
Niveau de complexité : Souverain & Technique
Densité technique : ≈ 78 %
Langues disponibles : FR · EN · ES · CAT · AR
Focal thématique : P2P, WebRTC, chiffrement, communication directe
Type éditorial : Chronique — Freemindtronic Cyberculture Series
Niveau d’enjeu : 8.4 / 10 — technique et souverain

Note éditoriale — Cette chronique s’inscrit dans la collection Freemindtronic Cyberculture, dédiée aux architectures souveraines et à la doctrine “local first — zero intermediaries”. Elle articule les approches protocolaires (WebRTC, ICE, DTLS-SRTP), les usages souverains (communication directe, absence de stockage en clair sur des serveurs) et les perspectives institutionnelles sur la protection des flux en environnement distribué. Ce contenu suit la Déclaration de transparence IA de Freemindtronic Andorra — FM-AI-2025-11-SMD5.
Les doctrines de Kurose, Rescorla et Hardy convergent : une communication n’est souveraine que lorsqu’elle s’opère directement entre pairs, sans serveur qui relaye, filtre ou observe le flux. Dans cette perspective, les technologies mises en œuvre par Freemindtronic — telles que DataShielder HSM PGP et PassCypher NFC HSM — démontrent cette souveraineté par design : chiffrement local, autonomie sans cloud et preuve de possession. CryptPeer applique ces mêmes principes à la communication directe via WebRTC, en substituant l’architecture pair-à-pair au modèle serveur-centré.
Illustration conceptuelle de la souveraineté individuelle numérique — un cerveau lumineux connecté à un cadenas symbolisant la preuve par la conception et la maîtrise souveraine des données.
✪ Illustration — représentation symbolique de la souveraineté individuelle numérique, où le cerveau et le cadenas incarnent la preuve par la conception et la liberté prouvée par la maîtrise de ses secrets.

Résumé avancé — P2P, WebRTC et architectures souveraines de communication directe

Lecture ≈ 7 min — Le modèle Pair-à-Pair (P2P) et WebRTC constituent aujourd’hui l’infrastructure technique la plus aboutie pour établir des communications directes, chiffrées et indépendantes des serveurs centraux. Ce segment expose les fondements protocolaires, les tensions architecturales et les cadres techniques qui redéfinissent la manière dont les individus échangent dans l’espace numérique. CryptPeer illustre cette doctrine souveraine en appliquant un contrôle intégral du flux, des clés et de la confidentialité.

Selon l’IETF (RFC 8825, 8826), WebRTC définit un ensemble de mécanismes permettant à deux appareils de négocier, chiffrer et maintenir une connexion directe. Cette architecture dépasse la simple optimisation de réseau : elle impose un paradigme où chaque utilisateur détient la maîtrise opérationnelle du canal, sans délégation à un serveur tiers. La souveraineté communicationnelle passe ici par la capacité à établir, maintenir et sécuriser une connexion de bout en bout sans dépendance structurelle.

Définition technique — IETF WebRTC Framework (RFC 8825)

« WebRTC est un ensemble de protocoles permettant l’établissement de sessions multimédias interactives entre navigateurs ou applications en utilisant un modèle de communication pair-à-pair sécurisé. »
Il implique :

  • Négociation SDP : description des capacités audio/vidéo, codecs et paramètres cryptographiques ;
  • Transports sécurisés : DTLS pour l’échange de clés, SRTP pour la protection des flux ;
  • Résolution de connectivité : ICE, STUN et TURN pour trouver un chemin direct à travers les NAT ;
  • Canaux de données P2P : DataChannel pour les échanges hors média, rapides et souverains.

Source : IETF — WebRTC RFC 8825 (2021)

Dans une lecture systémique, Rescorla (auteur du modèle de sécurité WebRTC) rappelle que la confidentialité réelle dans les communications repose avant tout sur la capacité à éviter les intermédiaires. Le chiffrement n’est pertinent que si le canal reste souverain, c’est-à-dire établi et contrôlé par les pairs eux-mêmes.

Pour Hardy et les travaux du W3C, la montée des architectures centralisées impose d’accorder la priorité aux protocoles permettant des interactions directes. L’autonomie technique devient une condition préalable à la protection des identités et des métadonnées.

Cadres normatifs contemporains — Vers une communication prouvée et souveraine

Les standards modernes de cybersécurité convergent vers le même constat :

  • NIST SP 800-207 (Zero Trust) — impose une vérification continue sans présumer de confiance dans les serveurs ;
  • ENISA 2024 — Communications sécurisées — valorise les architectures local trust où la preuve technique est détenue par l’utilisateur ;
  • IETF ICE Working Group — confirme que la résilience dans la communication dépend de la capacité à établir des chemins directs ;
  • Règlement (UE) 2023/1543 e-Evidence — rappelle que la non-conservation des flux et métadonnées constitue une conformité par absence.

Ces cadres renforcent la doctrine Freemindtronic : la confiance se prouve par la conception, et non par la délégation.

Le défi contemporain repose alors sur la distinction entre une “communication chiffrée” (dépendante d’un serveur qui relaie le flux) et une “communication souveraine” (aucun tiers, aucune émission de métadonnées hors des pairs).

Tableau de correspondance — Cadres P2P & WebRTC

Cadre technique Concept clé Modalité d’exercice Type de dépendance Source
IETF WebRTC 8825–8826 Communication directe sécurisée Négociation locale · DTLS/SRTP Réseau (NAT) IETF
ICE/STUN/TURN Découverte et traversée NAT Résolution d’adresse · chemins directs Opérateurs réseau RFC 8445
W3C WebRTC API Autonomie côté utilisateur Gestion locale · DataChannel Applications client W3C
NIST SP 800-207 Zero Trust interactif Preuve locale · validation continue Serveurs tiers NIST
⮞ En résumé technique — Le P2P et WebRTC réconcilient trois dimensions essentielles :
1️⃣ le transport (trouver un chemin direct),
2️⃣ le chiffrement (DTLS/SRTP local),
3️⃣ l’autonomie (DataChannel, absence de serveur).
Cette convergence fonde une communication réellement souveraine, où chaque pair détient la totalité de la preuve de confidentialité.
Doctrine Freemindtronic — CryptPeer applique ces principes en établissant des communications WebRTC entièrement P2P, sans relais tiers externe, sans stockage en clair sur des serveurs et sans dépendance aux plateformes cloud publiques ; au plus, un nœud relais local auto-hébergé, sous contrôle de l’organisation, achemine uniquement du trafic chiffré. Les utilisateurs détiennent la clé, le canal et la preuve de confidentialité. De la même manière que DataShielder HSM PGP et PassCypher NFC HSM démontrent la souveraineté cryptographique par la maîtrise locale, CryptPeer démontre la souveraineté communicationnelle par la connexion directe.
Ainsi, la communication devient une extension de l’autonomie technique : contrôler son canal, c’est s’autogouverner dans l’espace numérique.

2025 Cyberculture EviLink

P2P WebRTC Secure Messaging — CryptPeer Direct Communication End to End Encryption

P2P WebRTC secure messaging is the technical and sovereign backbone of CryptPeer’s direct, end-to-end encrypted [...]

2025 Cyberculture Cybersecurity Digital Security EviLink

CryptPeer messagerie P2P WebRTC : appels directs chiffrés de bout en bout

La messagerie P2P WebRTC sécurisée constitue le fondement technique et souverain de la communication directe [...]

2025 Cyberculture

Souveraineté individuelle numérique : fondements et tensions globales

Souveraineté individuelle numérique — fondement éthique et technique de l’autodétermination informationnelle, cette notion redéfinit aujourd’hui [...]

2025 Cyberculture

Audit ANSSI Louvre – Failles critiques et réponse souveraine PassCypher

Audit ANSSI Louvre : un angle mort cyber-physique documenté par des sources officielles en 2025 [...]

2025 Cyberculture

French Lecornu Decree 2025-980 — Metadata Retention & Sovereign

French Lecornu Decree No. 2025-980 — targeted metadata retention for national security. This decree redefines [...]

2025 Cyberculture

Décret LECORNU n°2025-980 🏛️Souveraineté Numérique

Décret Lecornu n°2025-980 — mesure de conservation ciblée des métadonnées au nom de la sécurité [...]

2026 Awards Cyberculture Digital Security Distinction Excellence EviOTP NFC HSM Technology EviPass EviPass NFC HSM technology EviPass Technology finalists PassCypher PassCypher

Quantum-Resistant Passwordless Manager — PassCypher finalist, Intersec Awards 2026 (FIDO-free, RAM-only)

Quantum-Resistant Passwordless Manager 2026 (QRPM) — Best Cybersecurity Solution Finalist by PassCypher sets a new [...]

2025 Cyberculture

Louvre Security Weaknesses — ANSSI Audit Fallout

Louvre security weaknesses: a cyber-physical blind spot that points to sovereign offline authentication as a [...]

2025 Cyberculture

Authentification sans mot de passe souveraine : sens, modèles et définitions officielles

Authentification sans mot de passe souveraine s’impose comme une doctrine essentielle de la cybersécurité moderne. [...]

2025 Cyberculture

Sovereign Passwordless Authentication — Quantum-Resilient Security

Quantum-Resilient Sovereign Passwordless Authentication stands as a core doctrine of modern cybersecurity. Far beyond the [...]

2025 Cyberculture Digital Security

Authentification multifacteur : anatomie, OTP, risques

Authentification Multifacteur : Anatomie souveraine Explorez les fondements de l’authentification numérique à travers une typologie [...]

2015 Cyberculture

Technology Readiness Levels: TRL10 Framework

Technology Readiness Levels (TRL) provide a structured framework to measure the maturity of innovations, from [...]

2025 Cyberculture Digital Security

Reputation Cyberattacks in Hybrid Conflicts — Anatomy of an Invisible Cyberwar

Synchronized APT leaks erode trust in tech, alliances, and legitimacy through narrative attacks timed with [...]

2024 Cyberculture Digital Security

Russian Cyberattack Microsoft: An Unprecedented Threat

Russian cyberattack on Microsoft by Midnight Blizzard (APT29) highlights the strategic risks to digital sovereignty. [...]

2024 2025 Cyberculture

Quantum Threats to Encryption: RSA, AES & ECC Defense

Quantum Computing Threats: RSA and AES Still Stand Strong Recent advancements in quantum computing, particularly [...]

2025 Cyberculture

Tchap Sovereign Messaging — Strategic Analysis France

History of Tchap The origins of Tchap date back to 2017, when the Interministerial Directorate [...]

2025 Cyberculture

Password Statistics 2025: Global Trends & Usage Analysis

Password Statistics 2025: Global Trends in Usage and Security Challenges The growing reliance on digital [...]

2025 Cyberculture

NGOs Legal UN Recognition

2025 Cyberculture

Time Spent on Authentication: Detailed and Analytical Overview

Study Overview: Objectives and Scope Understanding the cost of authentication time is crucial to improving [...]

2025 Cyberculture

Stop Browser Fingerprinting: Prevent Tracking and Protect Your Privacy

Stop Browser Fingerprinting: Google’s New Tracking Strategy & Privacy Risks (2025) From Condemnation to Enforcement [...]

2025 Cyberculture Legal information

French IT Liability Case: A Landmark in IT Accountability

The Context of the French IT Liability Case The Rennes French Court of Appeal examined [...]

2024 Cyberculture

French Digital Surveillance: Escaping Oversight

A Growing Threat to Privacy Social media platforms like Facebook and X are critical tools [...]

2024 Cyberculture

Mobile Cyber Threats: Protecting Government Communications

US Gov Agency Urges Employees to Limit Mobile Use Amid Growing Cyber Threats Reports indicate [...]

2024 Cyberculture

Electronic Warfare in Military Intelligence

Historical Context: The Evolution of Electronic Warfare in Military Intelligence From as early as World [...]

2024 Cyberculture

Restart Your Phone Weekly for Mobile Security and Performance

The Importance of Restarting Your Phone Weekly for Enhanced Mobile Security Restarting your phone weekly [...]

2024 Cyberculture

Digital Authentication Security: Protecting Data in the Modern World

Digital Authentication Security: The Guardian of Our Digital World In today’s digital life, authentication has [...]

2024 Articles Cyberculture Legal information

ANSSI Cryptography Authorization: Complete Declaration Guide

Complete Guide: Declaration and Application for Authorization for Cryptographic Means In France, the import, export, [...]

2021 Cyberculture Digital Security Phishing

Phishing Cyber victims caught between the hammer and the anvil

Phishing is a fraudulent technique that aims to deceive internet users and to steal their [...]

2024 Cyberculture

Telegram and Cybersecurity: The Arrest of Pavel Durov

Telegram and Cybersecurity: A Critical Moment On August 24, 2024, French authorities arrested Pavel Durov, [...]

2024 Articles Cyberculture

EAN Code Andorra: Why It Shares Spain’s 84 Code

All About EAN Codes and Their Importance EAN Code Andorra illustrates how the EAN (European [...]

2024 Cyberculture

Cybercrime Treaty 2024: UN’s Historic Agreement

UN Cybersecurity Treaty Establishes Global Cooperation The UN has actively taken a historic step by [...]

2024 Cyberculture

ITAR Dual-Use Encryption: Navigating Compliance in Cryptography

ITAR’s Scope and Impact on Dual-Use Encryption What is ITAR and How Does It Apply [...]

2024 Cyberculture

Encryption Dual-Use Regulation under EU Law

Legal Framework and Key Terminology in Encryption Dual-Use Regulation Definition of Dual-Use Encryption under EU [...]

2024 Cyberculture

European AI Law: Pioneering Global Standards for the Future

On August 1, 2024, the European Union (EU) implemented the world’s first comprehensive legislation on [...]

2024 Cyberculture DataShielder

Google Workspace Data Security: Legal Insights

Gmail Pro and Google Workspace: Legal Insights on U.S. Regulation and Data Security Gmail Pro, [...]

2024 Cyberculture EviSeed SeedNFC HSM

Crypto Regulations Transform Europe’s Market: MiCA Insights

Crypto regulations in Europe will undergo a significant transformation with the introduction of the Markets [...]

2024 Articles Cyberculture legal Legal information News

End-to-End Messaging Encryption Regulation – A European Issue

Regulation of Secure Communication in the EU The European Union is considering measures to regulate [...]

Articles Contactless passwordless Cyberculture EviOTP NFC HSM Technology EviPass NFC HSM technology multi-factor authentication Passwordless MFA

How to choose the best multi-factor authentication method for your online security

Everything you need to know about multi-factor authentication and its variants Have you ever wondered [...]

2024 Cyberculture Digital Security News Training

Andorra National Cyberattack Simulation: A Global First in Cyber Defense

Andorra Cybersecurity Simulation: A Vanguard of Digital Defense Andorra-la-Vieille, April 15, 2024 – Andorra is [...]

Articles Cyberculture Digital Security Technical News

Protect Meta Account Identity Theft with EviPass and EviOTP

Protecting Your Meta Account from Identity Theft Meta is a family of products that includes [...]

2024 Articles Cyberculture EviPass Password

Human Limitations in Strong Passwords Creation

Human Limitations in Strong Passwords: Cybersecurity’s Weak Link Passwords are essential for protecting our data [...]

2023 Articles Cyberculture EviCypher NFC HSM News Technologies

Telegram and the Information War in Ukraine

How Telegram Influences the Conflict between Russia and Ukraine Telegram and the information war in [...]

Articles Cyberculture EviCore NFC HSM Technology EviCypher NFC HSM EviCypher Technology

Communication Vulnerabilities 2023: Avoiding Cyber Threats

Communication Vulnerabilities in 2023: Unveiling the Hidden Dangers and Strategies to Evade Cyber Threats 2023 [...]

Articles Cyberculture NFC HSM technology Technical News

RSA Encryption: How the Marvin Attack Exposes a 25-Year-Old Flaw

How the RSA Encryption – Marvin Attack Reveals a 25-Year-Old Flaw and How to Protect [...]

2023 Articles Cyberculture Digital Security Technical News

Strong Passwords in the Quantum Computing Era

How to create strong passwords in the era of quantum computing? Quantum computing is a [...]

2023 Articles Cyberculture EviCore HSM OpenPGP Technology EviCore NFC HSM Browser Extension EviCore NFC HSM Technology Legal information Licences Freemindtronic

Unitary patent system: why some EU countries are not on board

Why some EU countries are not on board What is the unitary patent? The unitary [...]

2024 Crypto Currency Cryptocurrency Cyberculture Legal information

EU Sanctions Cryptocurrency Regulation: A Comprehensive Overview

EU Sanctions Cryptocurrency Regulation: A Comprehensive Overview The EU is stepping up its regulatory game [...]

2023 Articles Cyberculture Eco-friendly Electronics GreenTech Technologies

The first wood transistor for green electronics

What is a wood transistor? A transistor is a device that can amplify or switch [...]

2024 Cyberculture Legal information

Encrypted messaging: ECHR says no to states that want to spy on them

Encrypted messaging: ECHR says no to states that want to spy on them The historic [...]

2024 Cyberculture

Cyber Resilience Act: a European regulation to strengthen the cybersecurity of digital products

The Cyber Resilience Act: a European regulation to strengthen the cybersecurity of digital products The Cyber [...]

2024 Cyberculture Uncategorized

Chinese cyber espionage: a data leak reveals the secrets of their hackers

Chinese cyber espionage I-Soon: A data leak reveals the secrets of their hackers Chinese cyber [...]

2018 Articles Cyberculture Legal information News

Why does the Freemindtronic hardware wallet comply with the law?

2023 Cyberculture

New EU Data Protection Regulation 2023/2854: What you need to know

What you need to know about the new EU data protection regulation (2023/2854) Personal data [...]

2023 Articles Cyberculture Technologies

NRE Cost Optimization for Electronics: A Comprehensive Guide

Efficient NRE Cost Optimization for Electronics NRE Cost Optimization, in the field of electronic product [...]

Les chroniques affichées ci-dessus appartiennent à la même rubrique éditoriale Cyberculture. Elles prolongent l’analyse des architectures souveraines, de la cryptographie locale et des modèles distribués, éclairant les tensions entre dépendance réseau et autonomie technique. Cette sélection complète la présente chronique consacrée à la communication directe P2P WebRTC, pierre angulaire de la doctrine Freemindtronic.

Chronique — Architecture P2P, protocole WebRTC et souveraineté communicationnelle

TL;DR — La messagerie P2P WebRTC sécurisée forme l’ossature d’une messagerie souveraine, où la souveraineté ne dépend plus d’une autorité centrale mais d’une capacité locale : négocier, chiffrer et maintenir un flux direct entre pairs. CryptPeer applique ce modèle en supprimant les intermédiaires tiers et en confinant tout relais éventuel à un nœud local auto-hébergé qui ne fait qu’acheminer du chiffrement, prouvant ainsi la confidentialité par la conception plutôt que par la promesse.

Le modèle Pair-à-Pair (P2P) constitue l’une des évolutions les plus marquantes de l’architecture réseau depuis l’émergence de l’Internet moderne. Contrairement aux infrastructures centralisées, où le serveur gouverne l’accès, la métadonnée et la persistance, le P2P distribue ces fonctions entre les utilisateurs eux-mêmes. Lorsque cette logique rencontre WebRTC, la combinaison produit un canal souverain, chiffré et quasi-instantané, dont la maîtrise technique n’appartient qu’aux deux participants.

Dans cette chronique, nous analysons comment WebRTC implémente une communication réellement directe en combinant SDP (négociation), ICE/STUN/TURN (connectivité), DTLS/SRTP (chiffrement) et DataChannel (transport de données). Nous examinons également le rôle déterminant de CryptPeer, qui transpose ces principes dans une application souveraine, sans stockage, sans relais et sans collecte.

1. Modèle P2P — Fonctionnement, forces et limites

Le modèle Pair-à-Pair décrit une architecture où chaque entité agit simultanément comme émetteur, récepteur et nœud d’opération. En supprimant les fonctions centralisées, le P2P déplace la confiance vers les extrémités du réseau : les pairs. Ce modèle améliore naturellement la résilience, mais exige une maîtrise accrue des mécanismes de connectivité, d’authentification et de gestion des flux.

Key Insights — Le P2P repose sur trois caractéristiques structurantes :

  • Autonomie : aucune entité centrale ne surveille, filtre ou valide les échanges.
  • Résilience : même avec des réseaux fragmentés, les pairs peuvent communiquer tant qu’un chemin existe.
  • Confidentialité structurelle : l’absence d’intermédiaire réduit automatiquement la surface d’exposition.

1.1. Architecture distribuée : maîtrise locale du flux

Dans une architecture P2P, chaque pair détient la totalité du contexte de session. Cela signifie que la description du flux, la négociation, le chiffrement et la transmission des données ne sont pas déportés vers un serveur, mais gérés localement. Cette autonomie technique redéfinit l’économie de confiance : l’utilisateur ne dépend plus d’un tiers pour échanger.

1.2. Limites structurelles du P2P

Les pairs étant souvent derrière des routeurs NAT ou des pare-feux restrictifs, la résolution d’adresses et l’établissement du chemin nécessitent des stratégies plus complexes qu’en modèle centralisé. C’est précisément ce que WebRTC automatise, tout en conservant la souveraineté opérationnelle.

2. WebRTC — Le noyau de la communication directe

WebRTC constitue un ensemble structuré de protocoles, spécifiés par l’IETF et le W3C, qui permettent à deux appareils de communiquer directement sans serveur relais. Contrairement aux technologies traditionnelles (VoIP SIP, WebSocket, tunnels RTP), WebRTC encapsule l’ensemble du processus — négociation, chiffrement, découverte réseau, transport — dans une architecture cohérente, moderne et souveraine par construction.

Key Insights — WebRTC repose sur quatre piliers :

  • SDP : description et négociation des capacités des pairs.
  • ICE/STUN/TURN : recherche du meilleur chemin réseau.
  • DTLS/SRTP : chiffrement de bout en bout localement établi.
  • DataChannel : transport de données P2P souverain.

2.1. SDP — Le langage commun des pairs

Le Session Description Protocol décrit l’intégralité des capacités des pairs : codecs, clés, ports, options réseau. Cette description n’est jamais stockée par le serveur de signalisation, qui se contente de la transmettre. Cela garantit que seul l’utilisateur détient l’état réel de la session.

2.2. DTLS et SRTP — Le chiffrement négocié localement

Contrairement aux messageries classiques, où le serveur orchestre souvent la gestion des clés, WebRTC négocie les clés localement entre pairs via DTLS. Le chiffrement SRTP, dérivé de DTLS, protège ensuite les flux. Résultat : même un serveur TURN ne peut décrypter les données qu’il relaie.

3. ICE, STUN, TURN — Traversée NAT et résilience

ICE (Interactive Connectivity Establishment) coordonne la découverte des chemins réseau. STUN aide à déterminer l’adresse publique d’un pair. TURN sert d’ultime recours lorsqu’aucun chemin direct ne peut être établi. Cette mécanique permet d’établir des communications directes dans environ 85 % des configurations réseau.

Weak Signals — Les politiques NAT restrictives croissantes, conjuguées à l’usage intensif de réseaux mobiles, renforcent la nécessité d’optimiser ICE pour préserver l’autonomie des communications directes.

4. DataChannel — L’espace souverain hors média

Le WebRTC DataChannel permet d’envoyer texte, données binaires, fichiers et métadonnées directement d’un navigateur à l’autre. Il fonctionne sur SCTP encapsulé dans DTLS, garantissant une haute fiabilité et une confidentialité souveraine. Aucun serveur ne voit circuler ces données.

5. CryptPeer — Application souveraine du modèle P2P WebRTC

CryptPeer implémente de manière stricte le paradigme « direct-to-direct ». Aucun contenu en clair ni matériel de clé n’est jamais stocké sur un serveur ; seuls des éléments techniques chiffrés peuvent, de manière transitoire, circuler sur un relais local auto-hébergé. L’application n’utilise un serveur que pour la phase de signalisation initiale et, si nécessaire, un relais local placé sous contrôle organisationnel ; une fois la session WebRTC établie, la communication reste intégralement pair-à-pair et chiffrée de bout en bout.

Cette approche s’inscrit dans la doctrine Freemindtronic : la souveraineté se démontre par la maîtrise locale de la cryptographie, du canal et de l’exposition.

Chronique — Architecture P2P, protocole WebRTC et souveraineté communicationnelle

TL;DR — Le P2P et WebRTC forment l’ossature d’une architecture de communication où la souveraineté ne dépend plus d’une autorité centrale mais d’une capacité locale : négocier, chiffrer et maintenir un flux direct entre pairs. CryptPeer applique ce modèle en éliminant les intermédiaires et en prouvant la confidentialité par la conception, non par la promesse.

Le modèle Pair-à-Pair (P2P) constitue l’une des évolutions les plus marquantes de l’architecture réseau depuis l’émergence de l’Internet moderne. Contrairement aux infrastructures centralisées, où le serveur gouverne l’accès, la métadonnée et la persistance, le P2P distribue ces fonctions entre les utilisateurs eux-mêmes. Lorsque cette logique rencontre WebRTC, la combinaison produit un canal souverain, chiffré et quasi-instantané, dont la maîtrise technique n’appartient qu’aux deux participants.

Dans cette chronique, nous analysons comment WebRTC implémente une communication réellement directe en combinant SDP (négociation), ICE/STUN/TURN (connectivité), DTLS/SRTP (chiffrement) et DataChannel (transport de données). Nous examinons également le rôle déterminant de CryptPeer, qui transpose ces principes dans une application souveraine, sans stockage, sans relais et sans collecte.

Modèle P2P — Fonctionnement, forces et limites

Le modèle Pair-à-Pair décrit une architecture où chaque entité agit simultanément comme émetteur, récepteur et nœud d’opération. En supprimant les fonctions centralisées, le P2P déplace la confiance vers les extrémités du réseau : les pairs. Ce modèle améliore naturellement la résilience, mais exige une maîtrise accrue des mécanismes de connectivité, d’authentification et de gestion des flux.

Key Insights — Le P2P repose sur trois caractéristiques structurantes :

  • Autonomie : aucune entité centrale ne surveille, filtre ou valide les échanges.
  • Résilience : même avec des réseaux fragmentés, les pairs peuvent communiquer tant qu’un chemin existe.
  • Confidentialité structurelle : l’absence d’intermédiaire réduit automatiquement la surface d’exposition.

Architecture distribuée : maîtrise locale du flux

Dans une architecture P2P, chaque pair détient la totalité du contexte de session. Cela signifie que la description du flux, la négociation, le chiffrement et la transmission des données ne sont pas déportés vers un serveur, mais gérés localement. Cette autonomie technique redéfinit l’économie de confiance : l’utilisateur ne dépend plus d’un tiers pour échanger.

Limites structurelles du P2P

Les pairs étant souvent derrière des routeurs NAT ou des pare-feux restrictifs, la résolution d’adresses et l’établissement du chemin nécessitent des stratégies plus complexes qu’en modèle centralisé. C’est précisément ce que WebRTC automatise, tout en conservant la souveraineté opérationnelle.

WebRTC — Le noyau de la communication directe

WebRTC constitue un ensemble structuré de protocoles, spécifiés par l’IETF et le W3C, qui permettent à deux appareils de communiquer directement sans serveur relais. Contrairement aux technologies traditionnelles (VoIP SIP, WebSocket, tunnels RTP), WebRTC encapsule l’ensemble du processus — négociation, chiffrement, découverte réseau, transport — dans une architecture cohérente, moderne et souveraine par construction.

Key Insights — WebRTC repose sur quatre piliers :

  • SDP : description et négociation des capacités des pairs.
  • ICE/STUN/TURN : recherche du meilleur chemin réseau.
  • DTLS/SRTP : chiffrement de bout en bout localement établi.
  • DataChannel : transport de données P2P souverain.

SDP — Le langage commun des pairs

Le Session Description Protocol décrit l’intégralité des capacités des pairs : codecs, clés, ports, options réseau. Cette description n’est jamais stockée par le serveur de signalisation, qui se contente de la transmettre. Cela garantit que seul l’utilisateur détient l’état réel de la session.

DTLS et SRTP — Le chiffrement négocié localement

Contrairement aux messageries classiques, où le serveur orchestre souvent la gestion des clés, WebRTC négocie les clés localement entre pairs via DTLS. Le chiffrement SRTP, dérivé de DTLS, protège ensuite les flux. Résultat : même un serveur TURN ne peut décrypter les données qu’il relaie.

ICE, STUN, TURN — Traversée NAT et résilience

ICE (Interactive Connectivity Establishment) coordonne la découverte des chemins réseau. STUN aide à déterminer l’adresse publique d’un pair. TURN sert d’ultime recours lorsqu’aucun chemin direct ne peut être établi. Cette mécanique permet d’établir des communications directes dans environ 85 % des configurations réseau.

Weak Signals — Les politiques NAT restrictives croissantes, conjuguées à l’usage intensif de réseaux mobiles, renforcent la nécessité d’optimiser ICE pour préserver l’autonomie des communications directes.

DataChannel — L’espace souverain hors média

Le WebRTC DataChannel permet d’envoyer texte, données binaires, fichiers et métadonnées directement d’un navigateur à l’autre. Il fonctionne sur SCTP encapsulé dans DTLS, garantissant une haute fiabilité et une confidentialité souveraine. Aucun serveur ne voit circuler ces données.

CryptPeer — Application souveraine du modèle P2P WebRTC

CryptPeer implémente de manière stricte le paradigme « direct-to-direct ». Aucune métadonnée n’est stockée ; aucune clé ne transite par le serveur ; aucune interception n’est possible. L’application n’utilise un serveur que pour la signalisation initiale, puis la connexion devient totalement autonome.

Cette approche s’inscrit dans la doctrine Freemindtronic : la souveraineté se démontre par la maîtrise locale de la cryptographie, du canal et de l’exposition.

Sécurité — DTLS, SRTP et modèle de confiance locale

La sécurité des communications WebRTC repose sur une articulation méthodique de protocoles conçus pour établir une confiance locale. Le chiffrement n’est pas un service ajouté ; il constitue l’armature même du transport. Cette approche structurelle distingue le P2P WebRTC des messageries traditionnelles où la plateforme sert d’intermédiaire cryptographique, parfois en générant ou en stockant des clés. Ici, les clés ne quittent jamais les pairs.

Key Insights — La sécurité WebRTC repose sur trois mécanismes indissociables :

  • DTLS : négociation locale des clés par les pairs ;
  • SRTP : chiffrement applicatif des flux audio/vidéo ;
  • Identity Assertion : validation externe optionnelle pour authentifier les pairs.

Ces trois mécanismes rendent toute interception techniquement vaine, même via un serveur TURN.

DTLS — La négociation cryptographique sans tiers

WebRTC utilise DTLS pour négocier les clés cryptographiques directement entre les pairs. Contrairement aux protocoles centralisés, aucun serveur ne participe à la négociation. DTLS crée un canal sécurisé à travers le réseau, assurant que seuls les pairs authentiques peuvent dériver les clés SRTP nécessaires au chiffrement des flux.

SRTP — Le chiffrement applicatif des flux multimédia

Une fois les clés échangées via DTLS, WebRTC applique SRTP pour chiffrer chaque paquet audio et vidéo. Cette protection opère indépendamment de la topologie réseau, garantissant une confidentialité même en présence d’un relais TURN. Ainsi, le transport n’affecte jamais la sécurité du flux.

Preuve locale et souveraineté de communication

Comme aucun serveur ne détient les clés, la confidentialité du flux dépend exclusivement de la capacité des pairs à sécuriser leur environnement local. Ce modèle renverse l’économie de la confiance : la sécurité ne repose plus sur une entité centrale, mais sur une preuve locale et vérifiable.

Performances — Latence, optimisation et stabilité

Le P2P WebRTC se caractérise par une latence très faible, car aucune plateforme intermédiaire ne relaie les paquets. Cette optimisation native est essentielle pour la visioconférence, le streaming interactif, le partage d’écran ou les communications sensibles à la synchronisation.

Key Insights — Les performances WebRTC s’appuient sur :

  • Congestion Control : algorithmes GCC/TFRC adaptant dynamiquement le débit ;
  • Codec agility : sélection automatique entre VP8, VP9, H.264 selon les capacités ;
  • Transport adaptatif : maintien du flux même en cas de dégradation temporaire.

Latence minimale et trajectoire directe

Grâce à ses mécanismes de transport direct, WebRTC élimine les traitements serveur, réduisant la latence à son strict minimum. Cela favorise des communications plus naturelles, fluides et fiables, même en conditions réseau hétérogènes.

Résilience face aux pertes de paquets

WebRTC implémente des mécanismes de correction d’erreurs et de retransmission sélective. Le flux reste cohérent même en présence de pertes ponctuelles, caractéristique indispensable dans des environnements instables (réseaux mobiles, Wi-Fi saturé).

Défis contemporains — P2P face aux politiques réseau

La multiplication des dispositifs NAT, les restrictions imposées par les opérateurs et les politiques de sécurité en entreprise réduisent les probabilités de connexion directe. Bien que WebRTC soit conçu pour contourner la majorité de ces obstacles, certains environnements extrêmes imposent l’usage de TURN.

Weak Signals — La tendance croissante aux NAT symétriques pourrait accroître la dépendance au relais TURN dans les environnements restrictifs. L’enjeu : préserver l’autonomie des communications directes face à des politiques réseau plus agressives.

Souveraineté technique — Preuve locale et non-conservation

La souveraineté d’une communication dans CryptPeer repose sur deux principes vérifiables : la preuve locale et l’absence de conservation en clair côté serveur. Dans l’implémentation CryptPeer, un HSM numérique à clés segmentées gère les secrets en dehors du système d’exploitation du terminal, et chaque message s’appuie sur une clé éphémère dédiée. Compromettre un appareil ou un message ne permet donc ni de reconstruire l’historique, ni d’ouvrir l’annuaire de l’organisation.

Sur le plan transport, tout nœud relais éventuel est auto-hébergé et ne voit jamais que des flux chiffrés de bout en bout ; sur le plan stockage, les serveurs ne conservent aucun contenu lisible, aucune métadonnée exploitable et aucune clé réutilisable. Les utilisateurs peuvent décider, pour chaque fichier et sur chaque terminal, de ne garder que des copies chiffrées localement, ou d’autoriser temporairement une version déchiffrée — un point clé sur les postes partagés ou de confiance limitée. Les éventuelles traces résiduelles restent chiffrées et sous contrôle de l’utilisateur ou de l’organisation.

Cette approche est parfaitement cohérente avec la doctrine Freemindtronic : une architecture souveraine se mesure à sa capacité à fonctionner sans porter atteinte à l’autonomie de l’utilisateur et sans déléguer la gouvernance cryptographique à des tiers.

CryptPeer illustre cette transition : l’application démontre qu’une infrastructure réellement souveraine peut fonctionner sans cloud, sans relais et sans exposition des données. Ce modèle préfigure les futurs systèmes de communication de confiance. CryptPeer illustre cette transition : l’application démontre qu’une infrastructure réellement souveraine peut fonctionner sans cloud, sans relais et sans exposition des données. Elle crée des bulles de communication chiffrées, isolées des clouds publics, adaptées aux salles de crise et aux environnements déconnectés. Ce modèle préfigure les futurs systèmes de communication de confiance.

FAQ technique — P2P, WebRTC et CryptPeer

Point clé — WebRTC chiffre toujours le trafic P2P par conception

Oui. Les implémentations modernes de WebRTC chiffrent systématiquement les flux par défaut. Dans tous les navigateurs actuels, WebRTC protège les flux audio et vidéo avec SRTP. Par ailleurs, il sécurise les canaux de données avec DTLS/SCTP. Aucun paquet WebRTC ne circule donc en clair sur le réseau. Même pour des appels simples ou des échanges de fichiers basiques, le chiffrement reste actif.

Ainsi, la messagerie P2P WebRTC sécurisée part d’un transport déjà chiffré. CryptPeer va plus loin. En effet, la plateforme ajoute un HSM numérique à clés segmentées. Elle applique aussi des clés éphémères par message par-dessus WebRTC. En pratique, WebRTC fournit le tunnel sécurisé. De son côté, CryptPeer construit à l’intérieur une couche de messagerie chiffrée de bout en bout réellement souveraine. Vous bénéficiez d’un chiffrement standardisé et largement audité. De plus, vous profitez d’un modèle E2EE gouverné par HSM pour la confidentialité de long terme.

Question d’interception — Ce qu’un relais voit réellement sur le réseau

Non. Un relais TURN ne voit jamais le contenu lisible d’un flux de messagerie P2P WebRTC sécurisée. Il se contente de transférer des paquets chiffrés. Il ne possède pas les clés nécessaires pour les déchiffrer. Même sur des sessions longues, il ne manipule que du chiffrement opaque. Il ne reçoit jamais assez d’information pour reconstruire les médias ou les messages.

CryptPeer exploite cette propriété de manière souveraine. Lorsqu’un relais devient nécessaire, il fonctionne comme un nœud optionnel et auto-hébergé. Il reste sous le contrôle de l’organisation au sein d’une infrastructure locale ou nationale. Ainsi, les opérateurs télécom, les fournisseurs cloud et d’éventuels attaquants externes ne gagnent aucun nouveau point d’observation déterminant sur vos flux. Ils ne voient que du trafic chiffré de bout en bout. Le relais agit donc comme un simple passe-plat, sans pouvoir de déchiffrement ni rétention exploitable de métadonnées.

Question de souveraineté — Qui contrôle vraiment le canal et les clés ?

CryptPeer délivre une communication souveraine parce qu’il laisse à l’organisation la maîtrise complète des infrastructures, des clés et de l’exposition. Vous exploitez vous-même les serveurs, du micro-nœud Raspberry Pi 5 jusqu’au datacentre ministériel. Vous ne déléguez jamais le pouvoir de chiffrement à un cloud tiers. Concrètement, les serveurs gèrent uniquement la signalisation. Le cas échéant, ils pilotent aussi un relais auto-hébergé. Ils ne voient jamais les contenus en clair ni les clés maîtresses.

Parallèlement, CryptPeer s’appuie sur un HSM numérique à clés segmentées. Il utilise également des clés éphémères par message pour le chiffrement de bout en bout. Ce chiffrement ne dépend pas du système d’exploitation du téléphone ou du PC. Combiné à la messagerie P2P WebRTC sécurisée et au mode bulle totalement local, ce modèle reste très robuste. Il permet aux services régaliens et aux opérateurs d’infrastructures critiques de conserver sous leur seul contrôle la gouvernance cryptographique, les flux et le périmètre d’identité.

Scénario tactique — Bulles P2P sans aucun squelette Internet

Oui, le P2P WebRTC fonctionne très bien sur un réseau local sans aucune connexion Internet. WebRTC peut s’appuyer sur ICE et mDNS pour découvrir les pairs. Cette découverte se fait exclusivement à l’intérieur d’un Wi-Fi privé ou d’un LAN filaire. Dans ce cas, l’intégralité du flux de messagerie P2P WebRTC sécurisée reste confinée dans le périmètre réseau local. Elle ne touche jamais l’Internet public.

CryptPeer exploite cette capacité pour créer des bulles de communication tactiques. Les smartphones et ordinateurs peuvent rester en mode avion, sans carte SIM. Ils fonctionnent aussi sans attachement 2G/3G/4G/5G. Malgré cela, ils continuent à échanger messages et appels en temps réel via un micro-nœud local. Par exemple, un Raspberry Pi 5 configuré en point d’accès Wi-Fi suffit. Ce mode convient particulièrement aux théâtres d’opérations sensibles, aux salles de crise ou aux environnements air-gap. Dans ces contextes, on coupe volontairement toute dépendance au cloud public et aux opérateurs télécom.

Réponse à incident — Limiter le rayon d’explosion d’une compromission

Si un attaquant compromet un terminal ou un compte utilisateur, le design de CryptPeer limite activement le rayon d’impact. D’abord, le HSM numérique à clés segmentées protège les secrets. De plus, les clés éphémères par message empêchent une compromission unique d’ouvrir un archivage complet de conversations. Chaque message repose sur une clé dérivée spécifique. Un attaquant ne gagne donc pas automatiquement l’accès à l’historique entier.

Ensuite, CryptPeer organise les utilisateurs en catégories et en bulles. Celles-ci appliquent strictement le principe du besoin d’en connaître. Une identité compromise ne voit jamais l’ensemble de l’organisation. Elle ne voit que son périmètre autorisé : unités, missions, services, théâtres ou partenaires. Le rayon d’explosion reste donc limité sur le plan cryptographique. Il reste aussi limité sur le plan organisationnel. Ce modèle correspond aux scénarios de défense, de renseignement et d’OIV. Dans ces environnements, on part du principe que des incidents finiront par survenir. On conçoit alors l’architecture pour les contenir par défaut.

Clarification — Un transport sécurisé ne suffit pas à garantir l’E2EE

Non, WebRTC n’est pas automatiquement synonyme de chiffrement complet de bout en bout. WebRTC sécurise d’abord le transport. Il chiffre les flux médias et données sur le réseau à l’aide de DTLS, SRTP et SCTP. Cette approche protège contre de nombreuses attaques de niveau réseau, comme l’écoute passive ou certains MITM sur des routeurs intermédiaires.

Cependant, le vrai chiffrement de bout en bout dépend de la façon dont l’application génère, stocke et échange les clés. Si un serveur crée ou conserve les clés, la solution n’est pas réellement E2EE, même si elle utilise WebRTC. CryptPeer utilise donc WebRTC comme fondation de transport sécurisé. Il ajoute ensuite un HSM numérique à clés segmentées et des clés éphémères par message. Les serveurs ne reçoivent jamais les clés maîtresses en clair. Ils ne peuvent pas les reconstruire. Ainsi, CryptPeer transforme un transport WebRTC sécurisé en une couche de messagerie et de collaboration réellement chiffrée de bout en bout et souveraine.

Préoccupation de vie privée — Comprendre ce que l’autre côté voit réellement

Dans une session P2P WebRTC directe, chaque pair voit généralement les adresses réseau utilisées pour la connexion. Celles-ci peuvent inclure des IP publiques ou privées selon la topologie. Ce comportement est normal pour toute communication IP temps réel. En effet, les deux extrémités doivent savoir comment se joindre au niveau réseau.

CryptPeer atténue cet aspect de plusieurs façons. D’abord, il est possible de faire fonctionner CryptPeer entièrement à l’intérieur d’une bulle Wi-Fi locale découplée d’Internet. Dans cette configuration, les pairs ne voient que des adresses IP privées. Ces adresses n’ont aucune signification sur le réseau public. Ensuite, tous les messages et appels utilisent une messagerie P2P WebRTC sécurisée avec un chiffrement de bout en bout fort. Il n’y a pas de conservation de métadonnées en clair côté serveur. Même si des informations d’IP sont visibles entre pairs, elles ne donnent jamais accès à des contenus lisibles ou à des clés cryptographiques. Elles ne révèlent pas non plus un annuaire global de l’organisation. Pour de nombreux usages institutionnels, cet équilibre offre à la fois efficacité opérationnelle et robustesse en matière de vie privée.

Comparatif — Au-delà des messageries chiffrées grand public

CryptPeer se distingue des messageries sécurisées classiques sur plusieurs points stratégiques. D’abord, il fonctionne à 100 % dans le navigateur, sans installation. Vous pouvez donc l’utiliser sur des postes verrouillés, des terminaux mutualisés ou dans des salles de crise où les applications natives sont interdites. Il suffit d’ouvrir un navigateur et de rejoindre la bulle de messagerie P2P WebRTC sécurisée.

Ensuite, CryptPeer ancre sa sécurité dans un HSM numérique à clés segmentées avec des clés éphémères par message. Il ne s’appuie pas sur le système d’exploitation du téléphone ou du PC pour protéger les secrets. De plus, il fonctionne comme une bulle de communication souveraine, sans Internet ni cloud public. Il s’appuie uniquement sur des infrastructures locales ou nationales sous contrôle organisationnel. Enfin, il structure les identités via des catégories et des bulles alignées sur les doctrines de besoin d’en connaître. Il évite ainsi les annuaires globaux basés sur les numéros de téléphone ou les e-mails. En bref, CryptPeer vise les services régaliens, les écosystèmes de défense et les opérateurs d’infrastructures critiques plutôt que le marché grand public.

Gouvernance vs surveillance — Les admins pilotent le système, pas le contenu

Non. Les administrateurs de CryptPeer ne lisent ni ne déchiffrent les conversations des utilisateurs. Ils gèrent l’infrastructure, les catégories et les bulles. Ils pilotent aussi les mises à jour des serveurs et la supervision des ressources. En revanche, ils ne reçoivent jamais les clés de chiffrement de bout en bout. Le serveur de relais ne fait que transférer du chiffrement. Il ne stocke pas de messages en clair ni de secrets exploitables.

En parallèle, la gouvernance reste solide. Les administrateurs peuvent appliquer des politiques d’accès fines. Ils configurent des bulles pour différentes missions ou différents théâtres. Ils définissent aussi des règles de rétention pour certaines données techniques, sans transformer CryptPeer en outil de surveillance de masse. Cette séparation entre pouvoir administratif et capacité de déchiffrement s’aligne sur les doctrines de besoin d’en connaître. Elle répond également aux attentes des organisations de défense, de renseignement et d’infrastructures critiques. Ces acteurs exigent une gouvernance forte sans compromettre la confidentialité.

Angle juridique — Conformité sans affaiblir le chiffrement

CryptPeer traite l’accès légal et les contraintes réglementaires au niveau de l’architecture et de la gouvernance. Il n’introduit pas de portes dérobées cryptographiques. La plateforme ne stocke ni messages en clair ni clés maîtresses côté serveur. Elle ne peut donc pas déchiffrer rétroactivement un historique complet de communications sur simple réquisition. Chaque organisation reste responsable de ses propres processus juridiques au niveau des endpoints. Elle garde la main sur la gestion de ses terminaux et de ses identités.

Au niveau infrastructure, CryptPeer peut néanmoins fournir certaines informations d’audit. Il s’agit par exemple de données sur les ressources, la disponibilité, des événements de connexion ou l’état de santé des serveurs. Tout reste sous le contrôle de l’organisation. Cette approche permet de concilier conformité avec les politiques internes et les réglementations sectorielles. Elle préserve en même temps l’intégrité de la messagerie P2P WebRTC sécurisée et du chiffrement de bout en bout. En d’autres termes, CryptPeer sépare la gouvernance légale de l’affaiblissement cryptographique. Ce choix est essentiel pour les usages à haut niveau d’assurance.

Dimension quantique — Comment la messagerie P2P WebRTC se prépare au post-quantique

CryptPeer intègre la menace quantique au niveau architectural. Aujourd’hui, il s’appuie sur une cryptographie symétrique éprouvée telle qu’AES-256-GCM. Cet algorithme reste considéré comme robuste même dans un contexte post-quantique lorsqu’il est utilisé avec une clé de 256 bits. Un ordinateur quantique à grande échelle pourrait accélérer certaines attaques par force brute via l’algorithme de Grover. Toutefois, AES-256 conserve une marge de sécurité très importante pour des communications chiffrées de bout en bout de longue durée.

Surtout, CryptPeer ne se limite pas à une seule clé de 256 bits. La plateforme utilise un HSM numérique à clés segmentées. Elle génère plusieurs segments de 256 bits indépendants. Elle dérive ensuite la clé maîtresse uniquement en mémoire volatile (RAM). À partir de cette clé maîtresse, CryptPeer dérive des clés éphémères par message pour la messagerie P2P WebRTC sécurisée. Un attaquant devrait donc récupérer chaque segment et comprendre la méthode de dérivation. Il devrait encore affronter des espaces de clés gigantesques. Ce scénario reste bien plus complexe que les modèles d’attaque classiques.

Par ailleurs, CryptPeer s’appuie sur des algorithmes standardisés et ouverts plutôt que sur des chiffrements propriétaires. Cette stratégie facilite la migration future vers des schémas post-quantiques, par exemple pour l’échange de clés ou les signatures, à mesure que WebRTC et DTLS évolueront. En pratique, la combinaison AES-256-GCM, HSM à clés segmentées et clés éphémères par message offre déjà un niveau de résilience très élevé aujourd’hui. Elle conserve en même temps une trajectoire claire vers les futurs standards post-quantiques.

What We Didn’t Cover

Cette chronique, centrée sur le modèle P2P WebRTC et son implémentation souveraine dans CryptPeer, n’aborde pas plusieurs dimensions importantes du domaine. D’autres aspects, bien que pertinents, dépassent le périmètre de ce dossier et feront l’objet de développements séparés.
  • Les architectures distribuées hybrides — leur coexistence avec WebRTC dans des systèmes mixtes (edge computing, mesh networking).
  • Les modèles avancés de détection de compromission locale — indispensables pour renforcer la souveraineté opérationnelle côté utilisateur.
  • Les stratégies d’atténuation de latence en environnements extrêmes — notamment sur réseaux mobiles asymétriques ou instables.
  • Les impacts géopolitiques des communications décentralisées — notamment face aux législations extraterritoriales.
  • Les mécanismes de pseudonymisation dynamique — utiles pour dissocier identité et canal en communication directe.

Ces sujets complètent les fondations posées ici. Ils éclairent des dimensions qui influencent directement la résilience, la confidentialité et la portabilité des architectures souveraines. Ils seront traités dans d’autres chroniques techniques de la série Freemindtronic Cyberculture.

Cas d’usage souverain — Freemindtronic

Le modèle P2P WebRTC que déploie CryptPeer s’inscrit dans la continuité des dispositifs souverains conçus par Freemindtronic. Chaque technologie répond à un principe commun : la preuve locale de confiance. Ce principe garantit que l’utilisateur reste le détenteur exclusif de ses clefs, de ses secrets et de son exposition.

DataShielder HSM PGP — Protection locale et chiffrement matériel

  • Stockage de clés hors ligne, inaccessible aux serveurs.
  • Chiffrement PGP entièrement réalisé dans le HSM physique.
  • Aucune empreinte numérique laissée hors du périmètre utilisateur.

PassCypher NFC HSM — Identités et secrets souverains

  • Gestion locale des identités, clés, secrets et OTP.
  • Dérivation cryptographique sans cloud ni infrastructure tierce.
  • Autonomie opérationnelle complète, même hors connexion.

CryptPeer — Communication directe P2P WebRTC

  • Flux audio/vidéo directs entre pairs, sans relais tiers ; uniquement un relais local auto-hébergé si aucun chemin direct n’est possible.
  • Chiffrement DTLS–SRTP négocié localement.
  • DataChannel souverain pour messages et fichiers.
  • Dans sa version distribuée par FullSecure, CryptPeer s’appuie sur la technologie EviLink HSM PGP de Freemindtronic, qui fournit la couche HSM numérique à clés segmentées décrite dans cette chronique.
  • Aucune métadonnée lisible conservée après la session ; les éventuelles traces techniques restent chiffrées et sous contrôle de l’utilisateur.

En associant ces dispositifs, Freemindtronic construit une doctrine qui unifie la souveraineté cryptographique, identitaire et communicationnelle : maîtriser ses clés, maîtriser ses données, maîtriser son canal.

Quantum-Resistant Passwordless Manager — PassCypher finalist, Intersec Awards 2026 (FIDO-free, RAM-only)

Image of the Intersec Awards 2026 ceremony in Dubai. Large screen announcing PassCypher NFC HSM & HSM PGP (FREEMINDTRONIC) as a Best Cybersecurity Solution Finalist. Features Quantum-Resistant Passwordless Manager patented technology, designed in Andorra 🇦🇩 and France 🇫🇷.

Quantum-Resistant Passwordless Manager 2026 (QRPM) — Best Cybersecurity Solution Finalist by PassCypher sets a new benchmark in sovereign, offline security. Finalist for Best Cybersecurity Solution at Intersec Dubai, it runs entirely in volatile memory—no cloud, no servers—protecting identities and secrets by design. As an offline password manager, PassCypher delivers local cryptology with segmented PGP keys and AES-256-CBC for resilient, air-gapped operations. Unlike a traditional password manager, it enables passwordless proof of possession across browsers and systems with universal interoperability. International recognition is confirmed on the official website: Intersec Awards 2026 finalists list. Freemindtronic Andorra warmly thanks the Intersec Dubai team and its international jury for their recognition.

Fast summary — Sovereign offline Passwordless Ecosystem (QRPM)

Quick read (≈ 4 min): The nomination of Freemindtronic Andorra among the Intersec Awards 2026 finalists in Best Cybersecurity Solution validates a complete sovereign ecosystem built around PassCypher HSM PGP and PassCypher NFC HSM. Engineered from French-origin patents and designed to run entirely in volatile memory (RAM-only), it enables passwordless authentication without FIDO — no transfer, no sync, no persistence. As an offline sovereign password manager, PassCypher delivers segmented PGP + AES-256-CBC for quantum-resistant passwordless security, with embedded translations (14 languages) for air-gapped use. Explore the full architecture in our offline sovereign password manager overview.

⚙ A sovereign model in action

PassCypher HSM PGP and PassCypher NFC HSM operate as true physical trust modules. They execute all critical operations locally — PGP encryption, signature, decryption, and authentication — with no server, no cloud, no third party. This offline passwordless model relies on proof of physical possession and embedded cryptology, breaking with FIDO or centralized SaaS approaches.

Why PassCypher is an offline sovereign password manager

PassCypher HSM PGP and PassCypher NFC HSM act as physical trust modules: all crypto (PGP encryption, signature, decryption, authentication) runs locally, serverless and cloudless. This FIDO-free passwordless model relies on proof of physical possession and embedded cryptology, not centralized identity brokers.

Global reach

This distinction places Freemindtronic Andorra among the world’s top cybersecurity solutions. It reinforces its pioneering role in sovereign offline protection and confirms the relevance of a neutral, independent, and interoperable model — blending French engineering, Andorran innovation, and Emirati recognition at the world’s largest security and digital resilience show.

Passwordless authentication without FIDO — sovereign offline model (QRPM)

PassCypher delivers passwordless access without FIDO/WebAuthn or identity federation. Validation happens locally (proof of physical possession), fully offline, with no servers, no cloud, and no persistent stores — a core pillar of the Quantum-Resistant Passwordless Manager 2026 doctrine.

  • Proof of possession — NFC/HID or local context; no third-party validators.
  • Local cryptology — segmented PGP + AES-256-CBC in RAM-only (ephemeral).
  • Universal interoperability — works across browsers/systems without passkeys or sync.

Reading settings

Fast summary reading time: ≈ 4 minutes
Advanced summary reading time: ≈ 6 minutes
Full chronicle reading time: ≈ 35 minutes
Publication date: 2025-10-30
Last update: 2025-10-31
Complexity level: Expert — Cryptology & Sovereignty
Technical density: ≈ 79%
Languages available: FR · CAT· EN· ES ·AR
Specific focus: Sovereign analysis — Freemindtronic Andorra, Intersec Dubai, offline cybersecurity
Reading order: Summary → Doctrine → Architecture → Impacts → International reach
Accessibility: Screen-reader optimized — anchors & structured tags
Editorial type: Special Awards Feature — Finalist Best Cybersecurity Solution
Stakes level: 8.1 / 10 — international, cryptologic, strategic
About the author: Jacques Gascuel, inventor and founder of Freemindtronic Andorra, expert in HSM architectures, cryptographic sovereignty, and offline security.

Note éditoriale — Cet article sera enrichi progressivement en fonction de la normalisation internationale des modèles souverains sans mot de passe et des évolutions ISO/NIST relatives à l’authentification hors ligne. Ce contenu est rédigé conformément à la Déclaration de transparence IA publiée par Freemindtronic Andorra FM-AI-2025-11-SMD5

Sovereign localization (offline)

Both PassCypher HSM PGP and PassCypher NFC HSM are natively translated into 13+ languages, including Arabic. Translations are embedded on-device (no calls to online translation services), ensuring confidentiality and air-gap availability.

🇫🇷 Visuel officiel des Intersec Awards 2026 à Dubaï — PassCypher NFC HSM & HSM PGP de Freemindtronic Andorra finaliste dans la catégorie « Meilleure solution de cybersécurité ». 🇬🇧 Official Intersec Awards 2026 visual — PassCypher NFC HSM & HSM PGP by Freemindtronic Andorra, finalist for “Best Cybersecurity Solution” in Dubai, UAE. 🇦🇩 Imatge oficial dels Intersec Awards 2026 a Dubai — PassCypher NFC HSM i HSM PGP de Freemindtronic Andorra finalista a la categoria « Millor solució de ciberseguretat ». 🇪🇸 Imagen oficial de los Intersec Awards 2026 en Dubái — PassCypher NFC HSM y HSM PGP de Freemindtronic Andorra finalista en la categoría « Mejor solución de ciberseguridad ». 🇸🇦 الصورة الرسمية لجوائز إنترسيك ٢٠٢٦ في دبي — PassCypher NFC HSM و HSM PGP من فريميندترونيك أندورا من بين المرشحين النهائيين لجائزة « أفضل حل للأمن السيبراني ».

⮞ Preamble — International and institutional recognition

Freemindtronic Andorra extends its sincere thanks to the international jury and to Messe Frankfurt Middle East, organizer of the Intersec Awards, for the quality, rigor, and global reach of this competition dedicated to security, sovereignty, and innovation. Awarded in Dubai — at the heart of the United Arab Emirates — this distinction confirms recognition of an Andorran innovation with European roots that stands as a model of sovereign, quantum-resistant, offline passwordless authentication. It also illustrates the shared commitment between Europe and the Arab world to promote digital architectures grounded in trust, neutrality, and technological resilience.

Advanced summary — Doctrine & strategic reach of the sovereign offline ecosystem

Intersec 2026 — PassCypher finalist (Best Cybersecurity Solution)

The Intersec Awards 2026 finalist status in the Best Cybersecurity Solution category sets PassCypher apart not only as a technological breakthrough but as a full-fledged sovereign doctrine for quantum-resistant passwordless security. This nomination is historic: it is the first time an Andorran solution, rooted in French-origin patents and operating with zero network dependency, has been recognized globally as a credible alternative to centralized architectures of major digital powers.

↪ Geopolitical and doctrinal reach

This recognition gives Andorra a new role: a laboratory of digital neutrality within the wider European space. Freemindtronic advances a sovereign innovation model — Andorran by neutrality, French by heritage, European by vision. By entering Best Cybersecurity Solution, PassCypher symbolizes a strategic balance between cryptologic independence and normative interoperability.

RAM-only security for passwordless sovereignty (QRPM)

↪ An offline architecture built on volatile memory

The PassCypher ecosystem rests on a singular principle: all critical operations — storage, derivation, authentication, key management — occur exclusively in volatile memory. No data is written, synchronized, or retained in persistent storage. By design, this approach removes interception, espionage, and post-execution compromise vectors, including under quantum threats.

Segmented PGP + AES-256-CBC powering quantum-resistant passwordless operations

↪ Segmentation and sovereignty of secrets

The system applies dynamic key segmentation that decouples each secret from its usage context. Each PassCypher instance acts like an autonomous micro-HSM: it isolates identities, verifies rights locally, and instantly destroys any data after use. This erase-by-design model contrasts with FIDO and SaaS paradigms, where persistence and delegation form structural vulnerabilities.

↪ A symbolic recognition for sovereign doctrine

Listing Freemindtronic Andorra among the 2026 finalists elevates technological sovereignty as a driver of international innovation. In a landscape dominated by cloud-centric solutions, PassCypher proves that controlled disconnection can become a strategic asset, ensuring regulatory independence, GDPR/NIS2 alignment, and resilience against industrial interdependencies.

⮞ Extended international recognition

The global reach of PassCypher now extends to the defense security domain. The solution will also be showcased by AMG PRO at MILIPOL 2025 — Booth 5T158 — as the official French partner of Freemindtronic Andorra for dual-use civil and military technologies. This presence confirms PassCypher as a reference solution for sovereign cybersecurity tailored to defense, resilience, and critical industries.

⮞ In short

  • Architecture: RAM-only volatile memory security with PGP segmented keys + AES-256-CBC.
  • Model: passwordless authentication without FIDO, serverless, cloudless, air-gapped.
  • Positioning: offline sovereign password manager for regulated, disconnected, and critical contexts.
  • Recognition: Intersec 2026 Best Cybersecurity Solution finalistquantum-resistant passwordless security by design.

2025 Cyberculture Cybersecurity Digital Security EviLink

CryptPeer messagerie P2P WebRTC : appels directs chiffrés de bout en bout

2026 Awards Cyberculture Digital Security Distinction Excellence EviOTP NFC HSM Technology EviPass EviPass NFC HSM technology EviPass Technology finalists PassCypher PassCypher

Quantum-Resistant Passwordless Manager — PassCypher finalist, Intersec Awards 2026 (FIDO-free, RAM-only)

2025 Cyberculture Digital Security

Authentification multifacteur : anatomie, OTP, risques

2024 Cyberculture Digital Security

Russian Cyberattack Microsoft: An Unprecedented Threat

2025 Cyberculture

NGOs Legal UN Recognition

2025 Cyberculture Legal information

French IT Liability Case: A Landmark in IT Accountability

2024 Articles Cyberculture Legal information

ANSSI Cryptography Authorization: Complete Declaration Guide

2021 Cyberculture Digital Security Phishing

Phishing Cyber victims caught between the hammer and the anvil

2024 Cyberculture DataShielder

Google Workspace Data Security: Legal Insights

2024 Articles Cyberculture legal Legal information News

End-to-End Messaging Encryption Regulation – A European Issue

Articles Contactless passwordless Cyberculture EviOTP NFC HSM Technology EviPass NFC HSM technology multi-factor authentication Passwordless MFA

How to choose the best multi-factor authentication method for your online security

2024 Cyberculture Digital Security News Training

Andorra National Cyberattack Simulation: A Global First in Cyber Defense

Articles Cyberculture Digital Security Technical News

Protect Meta Account Identity Theft with EviPass and EviOTP

2024 Articles Cyberculture EviPass Password

Human Limitations in Strong Passwords Creation

2023 Articles Cyberculture EviCypher NFC HSM News Technologies

Telegram and the Information War in Ukraine

Articles Cyberculture EviCore NFC HSM Technology EviCypher NFC HSM EviCypher Technology

Communication Vulnerabilities 2023: Avoiding Cyber Threats

Articles Cyberculture NFC HSM technology Technical News

RSA Encryption: How the Marvin Attack Exposes a 25-Year-Old Flaw

2023 Articles Cyberculture Digital Security Technical News

Strong Passwords in the Quantum Computing Era

2023 Articles Cyberculture EviCore HSM OpenPGP Technology EviCore NFC HSM Browser Extension EviCore NFC HSM Technology Legal information Licences Freemindtronic

Unitary patent system: why some EU countries are not on board

2024 Crypto Currency Cryptocurrency Cyberculture Legal information

EU Sanctions Cryptocurrency Regulation: A Comprehensive Overview

2023 Articles Cyberculture Eco-friendly Electronics GreenTech Technologies

The first wood transistor for green electronics

2018 Articles Cyberculture Legal information News

Why does the Freemindtronic hardware wallet comply with the law?

2023 Articles Cyberculture Technologies

NRE Cost Optimization for Electronics: A Comprehensive Guide

 

The posts shown above ↑ belong to the same editorial section Awards distinctions — Digital Security. They extend the analysis of sovereignty, Andorran neutrality, and offline secrets management, directly connected to PassCypher’s recognition at Intersec Dubai.

Chronicle — Sovereignty validated in Dubai (offline passwordless)

The official selection of Freemindtronic Andorra as an Intersec Awards 2026 Best Cybersecurity Solution finalist marks a historic shift. It is the first time an Andorran solution, engineered from French-origin patents and designed for zero network dependency, is recognized globally as a credible alternative to cloud-centric architectures.

↪ Sovereign algorithmic resilience (quantum-resistant by design)

Rather than relying on experimental post-quantum schemes, PassCypher delivers structural resilience: dynamic PGP key segmentation combined with AES-256-CBC, executed entirely in volatile memory (RAM-only). Keys are split into independent, ephemeral segments, disrupting exploitation paths—including those aligned with Grover or Shor. It is not PQC, but a quantum-resistant operating model by design.

↪ Innovation meets independence

The nomination validates a doctrine of resilience through disconnection: protect digital secrets with no server, no cloud, no trace. Authentication and secret management remain fully autonomous—passwordless authentication without FIDO, no WebAuthn, no identity brokers—so each user retains physical control over their keys, identities, and trust perimeter.

↪ Intersec Awards 2026 — ecosystem in the spotlight

Curated by Messe Frankfurt Middle East, Intersec highlights security innovations that balance performance, compliance, and independence. The presence of Freemindtronic Andorra underscores the international reach of a sovereign, offline cybersecurity doctrine developed in a neutral country and positioned as a credible alternative to global standards.

⮞ Intersec 2026 highlights

  • Event: Intersec Awards 2026 — Conrad Dubai
  • Category: Best Cybersecurity Solution
  • Finalist: Freemindtronic Andorra — PassCypher ecosystem
  • Innovation: Sovereign offline management of digital secrets (RAM-only, air-gapped)
  • Origin: French invention patents with international grants
  • Architecture: Volatile memory · Key segmentation · No cloud dependency
  • Doctrinal value: Technological sovereignty, geopolitical neutrality, cryptologic independence
  • Official validation: Official Intersec Awards 2026 finalists

This feature examines the doctrine, technical underpinnings, and strategic scope of this recognition—an institutional validation that proves digital identities can be safeguarded without connectivity.

Key takeaways:

  • Sovereign passwordless with 0 cloud / 0 server: proof of physical possession.
  • Universal interoperability (web/systems) without protocol dependency.
  • Structural resilience via key segmentation + volatile memory (RAM-only).

Official context — Intersec Awards 2026 for quantum-resistant passwordless security

🇫🇷 Visuel officiel des Intersec Awards 2026 à Dubaï — PassCypher NFC HSM & HSM PGP de Freemindtronic Andorra finaliste dans la catégorie « Meilleure solution de cybersécurité ». 🇬🇧 Official Intersec Awards 2026 visual — PassCypher NFC HSM & HSM PGP by Freemindtronic Andorra, finalist for “Best Cybersecurity Solution” in Dubai, UAE. 🇦🇩 Imatge oficial dels Intersec Awards 2026 a Dubai — PassCypher NFC HSM i HSM PGP de Freemindtronic Andorra finalista a la categoria « Millor solució de ciberseguretat ». 🇪🇸 Imagen oficial de los Intersec Awards 2026 en Dubái — PassCypher NFC HSM y HSM PGP de Freemindtronic Andorra finalista en la categoría « Mejor solución de ciberseguridad ». 🇸🇦 الصورة الرسمية لجوائز إنترسيك ٢٠٢٦ في دبي — PassCypher NFC HSM و HSM PGP من فريميندترونيك أندورا من بين المرشحين النهائيين لجائزة « أفضل حل للأمن السيبراني ».

Held in Dubai, the Intersec Awards have, since 2022, become a global benchmark for security, cybersecurity, and technological resilience. The 5th edition, scheduled for 13 January 2026 at the Conrad Dubai, will honor excellence across 17 categories covering cybersecurity, fire safety, civil defence, and critical infrastructure protection. In the Best Cybersecurity Solution category, only five finalists were shortlisted after a meticulous evaluation process led by an international jury of 23 experts from five countries — the United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia, the United Kingdom, Canada, and the United States — representing the world’s highest institutions in safety, civil defence, and cybersecurity.

For context, the previous edition — Intersec Awards 2025 — received over 1,400 international submissions across 15 categories, confirming the global scope and competitiveness of the event. Official source: Intersec 2025 Press Release — Messe Frankfurt Middle East.

⮞ Official Information

↪ Prestigious International Jury

The Intersec 2026 jury gathered 23 high-level experts representing leading institutions from the UAE, Saudi Arabia, the United Kingdom, Canada, and the United States — highlighting the event’s global credibility and balance between Middle Eastern and Western expertise.

  • Dubai Civil Defence — Lt. Col. Dr. Essa Al Mutawa, Head of Artificial Intelligence Department
  • UL Solutions — Gaith Baqer, Senior Regulatory Engineer
  • NFPA — Olga Caldonya, Director of International Development
  • IOSH (United Kingdom) — Richard Bate, President-Elect
  • WSP Middle East — Rob Davies & Emmanuel Yetch, Executive Directors
  • ASIS International — Hamad Al Mulla & Yassine Benaman, Senior Security Leaders

↪ Algorithmic Sovereignty — Quantum-Resistant by Design

Instead of relying on post-quantum experimental algorithms, PassCypher achieves structural quantum resistance through dynamic segmentation of PGP keys protected by AES-256-CBC encryption, executed entirely in volatile memory (RAM-only). Keys are divided into temporary, isolated fragments that self-destruct after use — eliminating exploitation vectors, including theoretical quantum attacks such as Grover and Shor. It is not PQC in the academic sense, but a sovereign, quantum-resistant architecture by design.

↪ PassCypher — First HSM Suite Natively Translated into Arabic

PassCypher is the first password manager and HSM suite to offer a fully localized Arabic interface with native RTL (right-to-left) support, operating completely offline. This design bridges European engineering and Arabic linguistic and cultural identity, providing a unique model of digital sovereignty independent of cloud infrastructure or centralized authentication systems.

↪ A Dual Historic Milestone

This nomination represents a dual historic milestone: the first Andorran company ever shortlisted in a UAE-based international technology competition, and the first sovereign offline cybersecurity solution recognized in the Best Cybersecurity Solution category. This distinction confirms disconnected architectures as credible global alternatives to centralized cloud models.

↪ Euro–Emirati Convergence on Sovereign Security

The 2026 recognition highlights the emergence of a Euro–Emirati dialogue on digital sovereignty and resilience-by-design architectures. PassCypher acts as a bridge between Andorran neutrality, French engineering, British institutional expertise, and transatlantic patent recognition — with technologies patented in the United Kingdom, the United States, and the European Union. This convergence exemplifies how interoperability, trust, and sovereign innovation can coexist within a shared international security vision. With this institutional and technological framework established, the next section explores the sovereign architecture and cryptographic doctrine that earned PassCypher international recognition at Intersec Dubai.

PassCypher innovation — Sovereign offline passwordless: security & independence (QRPM)

In a market dominated by cloud stacks and FIDO passkeys, the PassCypher ecosystem positions itself as a sovereign, disruptive alternative. Developed by Freemindtronic Andorra on French-origin patents, it rests on a cryptographic foundation executed in volatile memory (RAM-only) with AES-256-CBC and PGP key segmentation—an approach aligned with our Quantum-Resistant Passwordless Manager 2026 strategy.

↪ Two pillars of one sovereign ecosystem

  • PassCypher HSM PGP: a sovereign secrets and password manager for desktops, fully offline. All crypto runs in RAM for passwordless authentication and air-gapped workflows.
  • PassCypher NFC HSM: a portable hardware variant for NFC-enabled Android devices, turning any NFC medium into a physical trust module for universal passwordless authentication.

Interoperable by design, both run with no server, no cloud, no sync and no third-party trust. Secrets, keys, and identities remain local, isolated, and temporary—the core of sovereign cybersecurity.

↪ Sovereign localization — embedded translations (offline)

  • 13+ languages natively supported, including Arabic (UI/UX and help).
  • Embedded translations: no network calls, no telemetry, no external APIs.
  • Full RTL compatibility for Arabic, with consistent typography and safe offline layout.

↪ Sovereign passwordless authentication — without FIDO, without cloud

Unlike FIDO models tied to centralized validators or biometric identity keys, PassCypher operates 100% independently and offline. Authentication relies on proof of physical possession and local cryptologic checks—no external services, no cloud APIs, no persistent cookies. The result: a passwordless password manager compatible with all major operating systems, browsers, and web platforms, plus Android NFC for contactless use—universal interoperability without protocol lock-in.

⮞ Labeled “Quantum-Resistant Offline Passwordless Security”

In the official Intersec process, PassCypher is described as quantum-resistant offline passwordless security. Through AES-256-CBC plus a multi-layer PGP architecture with segmented keys, each fragment is unusable in isolation—disrupting algorithmic exploitation paths (e.g., Grover, Shor). This is not a PQC scheme; it is structural resistance via logical fragmentation and controlled ephemerality.

↪ A model of digital independence and trust

Cloudless cybersecurity can outperform centralized designs when hardware autonomy, local cryptology, and non-persistence are first principles. PassCypher resets digital trust to its foundation—security by design—and proves it across civil, industrial, and defense contexts as an offline sovereign password manager.

With the technical bedrock outlined, the next section turns to the territorial and doctrinal origins that shaped this Best Cybersecurity Solution finalist.

Andorran innovation — European roots of a Sovereign Quantum-Resistant Passwordless Manager

Having outlined the technical bedrock of the PassCypher ecosystem, it’s essential to map its institutional and territorial scope. Beyond engineering, the Intersec 2026 Best Cybersecurity Solution finalist status affirms an Andorran cybersecurity innovation—European in heritage, neutral in governance—now visible on the global stage of sovereign cybersecurity.

↪ Between French roots and Andorran neutrality

Born in Andorra in 2016 and built on French-origin patents granted internationally, PassCypher is designed, developed, and produced in Andorra. Its NFC HSM is manufactured in Andorra and France with Groupe Syselec, a long-standing industrial partner. This dual identity—Franco-Andorran lineage with Andorran sovereign governance—offers a concrete model of European industrial cooperation.

This positioning lets Freemindtronic act as a neutral actor, independent of political blocs yet aligned with a shared vision of trusted innovation.

↪ Why neutrality matters for a sovereign password manager

Andorra’s historic neutrality and geography between France and Spain create ideal conditions for technologies of trust and sovereignty. PassCypher’s offline sovereign password manager approach—RAM-only, cloudless, passwordless—can be adopted under diverse regulatory regimes without foreign infrastructure lock-in.

↪ Recognition with symbolic and strategic scope

Selection at the Intersec Awards 2026 signals an independent European approach succeeding in a demanding international arena, the United Arab Emirates—a global hub for security innovation. It shows that neutral European territories such as Andorra can balance dominant tech blocs while advancing quantum-resistant passwordless security.

↪ A bridge between two visions of sovereignty

Europe advances digital sovereignty via GDPR, NIS2, and DORA; the UAE pursues state-grade cybersecurity centered on resilience and autonomy. Recognition in Dubai links these visions, proving that neutral sovereign innovation can bridge European compliance and Emirati strategic needs through cloudless, interoperable architectures.

↪ Andorran doctrine of digital sovereignty

Freemindtronic Andorra embodies neutral digital sovereignty: innovation first, regulatory independence, and universal interoperability. This doctrine underpins PassCypher’s adoption across public and private sectors as a passwordless password manager that operates offline by design.

⮞ Transition

This institutional recognition sets up the next chapter: the historic first of a passwordless password manager shortlisted in a UAE technology competition—anchoring PassCypher in the history of major international cybersecurity awards.

Historic first — Passwordless finalist in the UAE (offline, sovereign)

PassCypher NFC HSM & HSM PGP, developed by Freemindtronic Andorra, is to our knowledge the first password manager—across all types (cloud, SaaS, biometric, open-source, sovereign, offline)—to be shortlisted as a finalist in a UAE technology competition.
This milestone follows major events such as GITEX Technology Week (2005), Dubai Future Accelerators (2015) and the Intersec Awards (since 2022), with none having previously shortlisted a password manager before PassCypher in 2026. It validates a quantum-resistant passwordless manager 2026 approach rooted in sovereignty and offline design.

Cross-check — History of tech competitions in the UAE

Competition Year founded Scope Password managers as finalists
GITEX Global / Cybersecurity Awards 2005 Global tech, AI, cloud, smart cities ❌ None
Dubai Future Accelerators 2015 Disruptive startups ❌ None
UAE Cybersecurity Council Challenges 2019 National resilience ❌ None
Dubai Cyber Index 2020 Public-sector evaluation ❌ None
Intersec Awards 2022 Security, cybersecurity, innovation PassCypher (2026)

Best Quantum-Resistant Passwordless Manager 2026 — positioning & use cases

Recognized at Intersec Dubai, PassCypher positions as the best quantum-resistant passwordless manager 2026 for organizations needing sovereign, cloudless operations. The stack combines offline validation (proof of possession) with RAM-only cryptology and segmented keys. For market context, see our best password manager 2026 snapshot.

  • Regulated & air-gapped environments (defense, energy, healthcare, finance, diplomacy).
  • Zero cloud rollouts where data residency and minimization are mandatory.
  • Interoperability across browsers/systems without FIDO/WebAuthn dependencies.

In summary:

To the best of our knowledge, no cloud, SaaS, biometric, open-source or sovereign solution in this category had reached finalist status in the UAE before PassCypher. This recognition strengthens Andorra’s stance in the UAE cybersecurity ecosystem and underscores the relevance of a passwordless password manager built for sovereign, offline use.

Doctrinal typology — What this sovereign offline manager is not

Before detailing validated sovereignty, it helps to situate PassCypher by contrast. The matrix below clarifies the doctrinal break.

Model Applies to PassCypher? Why
Cloud manager No transfer, no sync; offline sovereign password manager.
FIDO / Passkeys Local proof of possession; no identity federation.
Open-source Patented architecture; sovereign doctrine and QA chain.
SaaS / SSO No backend, no delegation; cloudless by design.
Local vault No persistence; RAM-only ephemeral memory.
Network Zero Trust ✔️ Complementary Zero-DOM doctrine: off-network, segmented identities.

This framing highlights PassCypher as offline, sovereign, universally interoperable—not a conventional password manager tied to cloud or FIDO, but a quantum-resistant passwordless manager 2026 architecture.

Validated sovereignty — Toward an independent model for Quantum-Resistant Passwordless Security

Recognition of Freemindtronic Andorra at Intersec confirms more than a product win: it validates a sovereign offline architecture designed for independence.

↪ Institutional validation of the sovereign doctrine

Shortlisting in Best Cybersecurity Solution endorses a philosophy of disconnected, self-contained security: protect digital secrets without cloud, dependency, or delegation, while aligning with global frameworks (GDPR/NIS2/ISO-27001).

↪ A response to systemic dependencies

Where most solutions assume permanent connectivity, PassCypher’s volatile-memory operations and data non-persistence remove centralization risks. Trust shifts from “trust a provider” to “depend on none.”

↪ Toward a global standard

By combining sovereignty, universal compatibility, and segmented cryptographic resilience, PassCypher outlines a path to an international norm for quantum-resistant passwordless security across defense, energy, health, finance, and diplomacy.
Through Dubai’s recognition, Intersec signals a new paradigm for digital security—where an offline sovereign password manager can serve as a Best Cybersecurity Solution reference.

⮞ Transition — Toward doctrinal consolidation

The next section details the cryptologic foundations and architectures behind this model—volatile memory, dynamic segmentation, and quantum-resilient design—linking doctrine to deployable practice.

International reach — Toward a global model for sovereign offline passwordless

What began as a finalist nod now signals the international confirmation of a neutral European doctrine born in Andorra: a quantum-resistant passwordless manager 2026 approach that redefines how digital security can be designed, governed, and certified as offline, sovereign, and interoperable.

↪ Recognition that transcends borders

The distinction at the Intersec Awards 2026 in Dubai arrives as digital sovereignty becomes a global priority. As a Best Cybersecurity Solution finalist, Freemindtronic Andorra positions PassCypher as a transcontinental reference between Europe and the Middle East—bridging European trust-and-compliance traditions with Emirati resilience and operational neutrality. Between these poles, PassCypher acts as a secure interoperability bridge.

↪ A global showcase for disconnected cybersecurity

Joining the select circle of vendors delivering trusted offline cybersecurity, Freemindtronic Andorra addresses government, industrial, and defense sectors seeking cloud-independent protection. The outcome: a concrete path where data protection, geopolitical neutrality, and technical interoperability coexist—strengthening Europe’s capacity for digital resilience.

↪ A step toward a sovereign global standard

With data volatility (RAM-only) and non-centralization as defaults, PassCypher outlines a universal sovereign standard for identity and secrets management. Trans-regional bodies—European, Arab, Asian—can align around a model that reconciles technical security and regulatory independence. Intersec’s recognition acts as a norm-convergence accelerator between national doctrines and emerging international standards.

↪ From distinction to diffusion

Beyond institutions, momentum translates into industrial cooperation and trusted partnerships among states, companies, and research hubs. Appearances at reference events such as MILIPOL 2025 and Intersec Dubai reinforce the dual focus—civil and military—and rising demand for an offline sovereign password manager that remains passwordless without FIDO.

↪ A European trajectory with global scope

Andorra’s recognition via Freemindtronic shows how a neutral micro-state can influence global security balances. As alliances polarize, neutral sovereign innovation offers a unifying alternative: a quantum-resistant passwordless doctrine that elevates independence without sacrificing interoperability.

⮞ Transition — Toward final consolidation

This international reach is not honorary: it is a global validation of an independent, resilient, sovereign model. The next section consolidates PassCypher’s doctrine and its role in shaping a global standard for digital trust.

Consolidated sovereignty — Toward an international standard for sovereign passwordless trust

In conclusion, the Intersec Awards 2026 finalist status for PassCypher is more than honorary: it signals the global validation of a sovereign cybersecurity model built on controlled disconnection, RAM-only (volatile) operations, and segmented cryptology. This trajectory aligns naturally with diverse regulatory environments — from EU frameworks (GDPR, NIS2, DORA) to UAE references (PDPL, DESC, IAS) — and favors the sovereign ownership of secrets at the heart of a quantum-resistant passwordless manager 2026 approach.

↪ Global regulatory compatibility by design

The offline sovereign password manager model (no cloud, no servers, proof of possession) supports key compliance objectives across major jurisdictions by minimizing data movement and persistence:

  • United Kingdom: UK GDPR, Data Protection Act 2018, and NCSC CAF control themes (asset management, identity & access, data security).
  • United States: alignment with control families in NIST SP 800-53 / SP 800-171 and Zero Trust (SP 800-207); supports privacy/security safeguards relevant to sectoral laws such as HIPAA and GLBA (data minimization, access control, auditability).
  • China: principles of the Cybersecurity Law, Data Security Law, and PIPL (data localization & purpose limitation aided by local, ephemeral processing).
  • Japan: APPI requirements (purpose specification, minimization, breach mitigation) supported by volatile-memory operation and no persistent stores.
  • South Korea: PIPA safeguards (consent, minimization, technical/managerial protection) helped by air-gapped usage and local validation.
  • India: DPDP Act 2023 (lawful processing, data minimization, security by design) addressed through FIDO-free passwordless and on-device cryptology.

Note:

PassCypher does not claim automatic certification; it enables organizations to meet mandated outcomes (segregation of duties, least privilege, breach impact reduction) by keeping secrets local, isolated, and ephemeral.

↪ Consolidating a universal doctrine

The doctrine of sovereign cybersecurity has moved from manifesto to practice. PassCypher HSM PGP and PassCypher NFC HSM show that cryptographic autonomy, global interoperability, and resilience to emerging threats can coexist in an offline sovereign password manager. Cross-regional interest — Europe, the GCC, the UK, the US, and Asia — confirms a simple premise: trusted cybersecurity requires digital sovereignty. The offline, volatile architecture underpins passwordless authentication without FIDO and independent secrets management at enterprise and state scale.

↪ Multilingual by design (embedded, offline)

To support global deployments and air-gapped operations, PassCypher ships with 13+ embedded languages (including Arabic, English, French, Spanish, Catalan, Japanese, Korean, Chinese Simplified, Hindi, Italian, Portuguese, Romanian, Russian, Ukrainian). UI and help content are fully offline (no external translation APIs), preserving confidentiality and availability.

↪ A catalyst for international standardization

Recognition in Dubai acts as a standardization accelerator. It opens the way to shared criteria where disconnected security and segmented identity protection are certifiable properties. In this view, PassCypher operates as a functional prototype for a future international digital-trust standard, informing dialogues between regulators and standards bodies across the EU, the UK, the Middle East, the US and Asia, encouraging convergence between compliance and sovereign-by-design architectures.

↪ Andorran sovereignty as a lever for global balance

Andorra’s neutrality and regulatory agility offer an ideal laboratory for sovereign innovation. The success of Freemindtronic Andorra shows that a nation outside the EU, yet closely aligned with its economic and legal sphere, can act as a balancing force between major technology blocs. The distinction in Dubai highlights a new center of gravity for global digital sovereignty, supported by Andorran leadership and French industrial partnerships — relevant to ministries, regulators, and critical industries across the UAE and beyond.

↪ A shared horizon: trust, neutrality, independence

This doctrine reframes the cybersecurity triad:

  • trust — local verification and proof of possession;
  • neutrality — no intermediaries, no vendor lock-in;
  • independence — removal of cloud/server dependencies.

The outcome is an open, interoperable, sovereign model — a practical answer for governments and enterprises seeking to protect digital secrets without sacrificing user freedom or national sovereignty.

“PassCypher is not a password manager. It is a sovereign, resilient, autonomous cryptographic state, recognized as an Intersec Awards 2026 finalist.” — Freemindtronic Andorra, Dubai · 13 January 2026

⮞ Weak signals identified

  • Pattern: Rising demand for cloudless passwordless in critical infrastructure.
  • Vector: GDPR/NIS2/DORA convergence with off-network sovereign doctrines; UAE PDPL/DESC/IAS imperatives; growing UK/US/Asia regulatory emphasis on data minimization and zero trust.
  • Trend: Defense & public-sector forums (e.g., Milipol November 2025, GCC security events) exploring RAM-only architectures.

⮞ Sovereign use case | Resilience with Freemindtronic

In this context, PassCypher HSM PGP and PassCypher NFC HSM neutralize:

  • Local validation by proof of possession (NFC/HID), no servers or cloud.
  • Ephemeral decryption in volatile memory (RAM-only), zero persistence.
  • Dynamic PGP segmentation with contextual isolation of secrets.

FAQ — Quantum-Resistant Passwordless Manager & sovereign cybersecurity

Is PassCypher compatible with today’s browsers without FIDO passkeys?

Quick take

Yes. PassCypher validates access by proof of possession with no server, no cloud, and no WebAuthn.

Why it matters

Because everything runs in volatile memory (RAM-only), it stays offline, universal, interoperable across browsers and systems. This directly serves queries like passwordless authentication without FIDO and offline sovereign password manager inside our Quantum-Resistant Passwordless Manager 2026 positioning.

In one sentence

FIDO relies on WebAuthn and identity federation; PassCypher is FIDO-free, serverless, cloudless, using segmented PGP + AES-256-CBC entirely in RAM.

Context & resources

Federation centralises trust and increases the attack surface. PassCypher replaces it with local cryptology and ephemeral material (derive → use → destroy). See:
WebAuthn API hijacking,
DOM extension clickjacking (DEF CON 33).
Targets: quantum-resistant passwordless security, passwordless password manager 2026.

Short answer

Yes. Arabic (RTL) and 13+ languages are embedded; translations work fully offline (air-gap), no external API calls.

Languages included

العربية, English, Français, Español, Català, Deutsch, 日本語, 한국어, 简体中文, हिन्दी, Italiano, Português, Română, Русский, Українська — aligned with the long-tail sovereign password manager for multi-region rollouts.

Essentials

No cloud, no servers, no persistence: secrets are created, used, then destroyed in RAM.

Under the hood

The RAM-only password manager pattern plus key segmentation removes common exfiltration paths (databases, sync, extensions). That’s core to our Quantum-Resistant Passwordless Manager 2026 doctrine.

Both roles, one stack

It is an offline sovereign password manager that also enables passwordless access without FIDO.

How it plays together

As a manager, secrets live only in volatile memory. As passwordless, it proves physical possession across browsers/systems. Covers intents: best password manager 2026 offline, cloudless password manager for enterprises.

Operational view

Yes. It is cloudless and serverless by design, compatible with desktop, web, and Android NFC environments.

Risk notes

No identity broker, no SaaS tenant, no extension layer — consistent with Zero Trust (local verification, least privilege). Related reads:
Persistent OAuth / 2FA weaknesses,
APT29 app-password abuse.

What you can expect

PassCypher doesn’t certify you automatically; it enables outcomes (minimisation, least privilege, impact reduction) by keeping secrets local, isolated, ephemeral.

Where it fits

Aligned with policy goals in EU GDPR/NIS2/DORA, UAE PDPL/DESC/IAS, UK (UK GDPR/DPA 2018/NCSC CAF), US (NIST SP 800-53/171, SP 800-207 Zero Trust, sectoral HIPAA/GLBA), CN (CSL/DSL/PIPL principles), JP (APPI), KR (PIPA), IN (DPDP). Supports our secondary intent: Best Cybersecurity Solution finalist (Intersec 2026).

Plain explanation

Here, “quantum-resistant” refers to structural resistancesegmentation and ephemerality in RAM — not to new PQC algorithms.

Design choice

We don’t replace primitives; we limit usefulness and lifetime of material so isolated fragments are worthless. Matches the long-tail quantum-resistant passwordless security.

Snapshot

It avoids the layers under fire: no WebAuthn, no browser extensions, no OAuth persistence, no stored app passwords.

Go deeper

Recommended reading:
WebAuthn API hijacking,
DOM extension clickjacking,
Persistent OAuth flaw (2FA),
APT29 app-passwords.

Reason in brief

For demonstrating that offline, sovereign, passwordless security (RAM-only + segmentation) scales globally — without cloud or federation.

Awards intent capture

This answers searches like best cybersecurity solution 2026 and best password manager 2026 offline, and supports our keyphrase Quantum-Resistant Passwordless Manager 2026 with multilingual reach (incl. Arabic) for Dubai & GCC audiences.

⮞ Go further — PassCypher solutions worldwide

Discover where to evaluate our offline sovereign password manager stack and passwordless authentication without FIDO across EMEA. These links cover hardware options, RAM-only apps, and universal interoperability accessories.

AMG PRO (Paris, France)
KUBB Secure by Bleu Jour (Toulouse, France)
Fullsecure Andorra

Tip: for internal linking and search intent capture, reference anchors such as /passcypher/offline-password-manager/ and /passcypher/best-password-manager-2026/ where appropriate.

This is not a PQC (post-quantum cryptography) scheme: protection stems from structural resistance — fragmentation and ephemerality in RAM — described as “quantum-resistant” by design.

⮞ Strategic outlook

Recognition of Freemindtronic Andorra at Intersec 2026 underlines that sovereignty is a universal technology value. By enabling cloudless, serverless operations with passwordless authentication without FIDO, the Quantum-Resistant Passwordless Manager 2026 approach advances a pragmatic path toward a global standard for digital trust — born in Andorra, recognized in Dubai, relevant to EMEA, the Americas, and Asia-Pacific.

NFC vCard Cardokey: Revolutionizing Digital Networking

Cardokey NFC vCard Business: Edit, Read, and Import Contacts Seamlessly on iPhone.

NFC vCard Cardokey: Free Digital Networking Revolution

This article examines Cardokey’s capabilities to create and manage NFC vCard digital business cards without servers, without databases, without the need for account creation, highlighting its commitment to security, privacy and sustainability . Learn how Cardokey leverages NFC technology to facilitate environmentally friendly and secure business information exchanges. Click here to access Cardokey download links

2025 Digital Security Technical News

Sovereign SSH Authentication with PassCypher HSM PGP — Zero Key in Clear

2025 Digital Security Tech Fixes Security Solutions Technical News

SSH Key PassCypher HSM PGP — Sécuriser l’accès multi-OS à un VPS

2025 Digital Security Technical News

Générateur de mots de passe souverain – PassCypher Secure Passgen WP

2025 Digital Security Technical News

Quantum computer 6100 qubits ⮞ Historic 2025 breakthrough

2025 Digital Security Technical News

Ordinateur quantique 6100 qubits ⮞ La percée historique 2025

2025 Tech Fixes Security Solutions Technical News

SSH VPS Sécurisé avec PassCypher HSM

2025 PassCypher Password Products Technical News

Passwordless Password Manager: Secure, One-Click Simplicity to Redefine Access

Stay informed with our posts dedicated to Technical News Cyberculture to track its evolution through our regularly updated topics.

Dive into our Tech News section for an in-depth look at the Cardokey NFC vCard, designed by Jacques Gascuel, a pioneer in the field of secure, contactless solutions without the need for servers or databases. Stay up to date and secure with our frequent updates.

NFC vCard: Revolutionize Your Professional Networking

As the creator of Cardokey, I am thrilled to introduce an application revolutionizing the exchange of professional information. Utilizing NFC technology, Cardokey offers a groundbreaking, free, and secure way to create, share, and manage NFC vCard digital business cards without the constraints of traditional methods. Expanding its functionalities to iPhone users, Cardokey now allows for the reading and importing of NFC vCards—a previously costly iOS feature. Moreover, we are on the cusp of enabling Cardokey Pro to convert HSM PGP badges into versatile NFC HSM badges.

The Innovative Concept Behind NFC vCard Cardokey

Cardokey was conceived 3 years ago with the ambition to simplify the sharing of digital identities through secure, data protection law-compliant methods. The application enables anonymous, contactless NFC vCard exchanges, functioning without servers, databases, or account creation, and is designed to operate even in restrictive environments like Faraday cages or in airplane mode. This not only ensures maximum security and privacy but also underscores our commitment to environmental sustainability by repurposing NFC-enabled devices.

Development and Security Features of NFC vCard Cardokey

Crafted by Freemindtronic SL and introduced by Fullsecure Andorra, Cardokey will integrate EviBadge HSM PGP technology, utilizing NFC NDEF storage through EviSwap NFC NDEF technology. This integration ensures the secure storage of encrypted authentication data created by Cardokey Pro Badge. This collaboration enhances Cardokey’s capacity for efficient and secure NFC vCard management, ensuring user privacy and offering flexibility in diverse environments, such as offline or airplane mode.

Ecological Impact and Compliance

Cardokey champions eco-friendly practices in professional networking. We align with the UN’s Sustainable Development Goal #12, adhering to ISO 14001, Basel, and WEEE standards. This commitment not only reduces our carbon footprint but also promotes sustainable consumption and production. Cardokey stands as a beacon for environmental stewardship within the digital networking sphere.

Innovative Reuse of NFC Devices

At Cardokey, we see value in repurposing various NFC devices. From ski lift tickets to more mundane objects, we transform them into vessels of professional connectivity. This practice not only breathes new life into potential waste but also aligns with our vision for a sustainable, connected world. With Cardokey, every NFC device has the potential for a meaningful second act.

Comprehensive Overview of Cardokey NFC vCard Capabilities

Cardokey’s functionalities are pivotal in reshaping professional networking. Our detailed table outlines the vast array of features available to both Android and iPhone users. Cardokey simplifies the creation and management of digital business cards and NFC data, ensuring a seamless, secure, and eco-conscious networking experience.

Intelligent Dynamic NFC Memory Management

A standout feature of Cardokey is its intelligent dynamic NFC memory management. This advanced functionality automatically notifies users of the real available memory space of the NFC device in use. By providing an accurate understanding of the storage capabilities within the NDEF-formatted EEPROM, Cardokey enhances user experience, allowing for informed data storage decisions. This insight into the actual storage potential elevates Cardokey’s usability, ensuring optimal use of NFC device memory.

Cardokey Datasheet: Global Deployment and Multilingual Support

Cardokey revolutionizes digital networking. It integrates Freemindtronic’s NFC NDEF EviSwap technology and complies with IEC/ISO 14443 and ISO/IEC 15693 standards. This datasheet highlights its universal security and usability.

Category Feature Android NFC iPhone NFC Coming Soon
Creation Craft a vCard considering space  
  Manually create an NFC NDEF vCard  
  Generate a vCard from a contact  
  Edit NFC URLs for social networks  
  Customize NFC URLs  
Badge Mode Create an NFC badge from an encrypted QR Code created by Cardokey Pro    
Management/Administration Import NFC vCard to Phone contacts  
  Manage NFC card data (CRUD)  
  Handle NFC card contacts (CRUD)  
  Display contact on phone and card  
  Convert NFC to NDEF format    
  Automate NFC card memory management  
  Translate into 14 languages  
  HELP (function explanations)  

EviSwap technology enables smart, dynamic NFC memory management. It optimizes NFC device use and provides an intuitive user experience. Cardokey facilitates international NFC device recycling and the use of physical NFC products destined for disposal. It promotes environmental care and enables meaningful global exchanges.This merged section showcases Cardokey’s features, international standards compatibility, and commitment to a borderless user experience. It also emphasizes EviSwap technology’s role in enabling secure, sustainable digital transformation in professional networking.

Use Cases for Cardokey

Cardokey’s versatility supports numerous professional networking scenarios:

Eco-Friendly Digital Business Card Exchange:

  • Swap paper cards for NFC vCards to cut carbon footprint and embrace sustainable development.
  • Share professional details effortlessly at various networking events.
  • Update your contact info anytime without reprinting business cards.

Simplified Management of Digital Identities:

  • Securely store and easily access NFC vCards on your mobile device.
  • Manage multiple vCards for diverse professional roles.
  • Import NFC vCards from different apps or platforms.

Creative Reuse of NFC Devices:

  • Repurpose NFC items like ski passes into personal or professional vCards.
  • Revive unused NFC devices, reducing electronic waste.
  • Implement sustainable networking practices through innovative device reuse.

Enhanced Security and Privacy:

  • Discreetly exchange secure information and contacts via non-connected NFC supports.
  • Operate offline for increased privacy, without reliance on servers or databases.
  • Avoid sharing contact details through third-party apps.

Additional Features:

  • NFC vCards in 14 languages (Arabic, Catalan, Chinese, English, French, German, Hindi, Italian, Japanese, Portuguese, Romanian, Russian, Spanish and Ukrainian) enable global networking.
  • Intelligent NFC memory management for optimal storage space usage.
  • Built-in help feature for easy acclimatization.

Added Value of Cardokey

Lifetime Free Updates for NFC vCards:

  • Ensures your information is always current.
  • Highlights Cardokey’s user-focused design.
  • Demonstrates Cardokey’s dedication to user service and sustainability.

Usage of Recycled Materials:

  • Lowers carbon footprint.
  • Offers a responsible alternative for professionals.
  • Positions Cardokey as an innovative and committed solution.

Example with an NFC Ski Ticket:

  • Simplifies sharing memories or professional links.
  • Gives new purpose to otherwise discarded items.
  • Showcases Cardokey’s adaptability to various needs.

Bridging the Gap in Digital Networking

The capabilities of Cardokey extend far beyond simple contact exchange. Our dedication to innovation, security, and ease of use is evident across all features. Upcoming functionalities will further enhance secure, efficient, and green professional networking. With Cardokey, you’re not merely sharing a digital card; you’re making a profound statement about your professional identity in the digital age.

Let’s Summarize

Cardokey is not just an NFC vCard creation application; it is an innovation in many ways that I passionately want to bring to the world. First of all, this tool is free. It works immediately offline, without needing a server, database, or even creating an account to use it. First of all, it should be noted that Cardokey uses NFC technology. Its objective is to actively participate in the digital transformation of the use of business cards in a digital way. At the same time, my innovation demonstrates a strong commitment to safety, security, privacy and environmental sustainability, principles that are dear to me.

Additionally, Cardokey redefines and expands how professionals connect, share and manage their digital identities. Indeed, it promotes the reuse of many NFC devices, ensuring compliance with strict data protection standards. My innovation doesn’t stop there. Since it presents itself as a pioneering solution, respectful of the environment while taking its legitimate place in the field of digital networks for dual civil and military use through its scalable capacity for free services. It’s a seamless simultaneity of technology and sustainability, a vision I’m proud to see brought to life and made available to you for free.

In conclusion Cardokey: More Than an App, a Sustainable Networking Revolution

Cardokey is evolving into much more than just an app; it represents a significant leap forward for professional networking. By integrating NFC vCard technology, Cardokey facilitates not only an eco-friendly and secure exchange of professional information but also sets a new standard in the way we connect in our digital world. The future holds even greater possibilities with the introduction of advanced cyber defense features, positioning Cardokey as an indispensable tool in the landscape of modern professional networking.

Through innovation, security, and a steadfast commitment to ecological responsibility, Cardokey is reimagining what it means to network professionally. It’s not just about sharing a digital card; it’s about forging connections that are secure, private, and impactful, all while caring for our planet. As we continue to develop Cardokey, we are guided by a vision of a world where professional interactions are seamless, sustainable, and above all, secure.

Join us as we move forward into this new era of professional networking. With Cardokey, you’re not just adopting a new tool; you’re embracing a future where technology enhances our professional lives without compromising our values or the environment. Welcome to the future of networking with Cardokey – where innovation meets sustainability.

We Value Your Feedback

If Cardokey has enhanced your networking experience, consider sharing it with others. Your feedback is crucial to us. Please feel free to rate us on the Apple Store and the Play Store. Every star ✨ and comment helps.

Thank you for your support in shaping the future of Cardokey.

Human Limitations in Strong Passwords Creation

Digital image showing a confused user at a computer surrounded by complex password symbols

How to Create Strong Passwords Despite Human Limitations

Human Limitations in Strong Passwords are crucial in safeguarding our personal and professional data online. But do you know how to craft a robust password capable of thwarting hacking attempts? In this article, we delve into the impact of human factors on password security. Furthermore, you will gain insights on overcoming these limitations and creating formidable passwords.

2025 Cyberculture Cybersecurity Digital Security EviLink

CryptPeer messagerie P2P WebRTC : appels directs chiffrés de bout en bout

2026 Awards Cyberculture Digital Security Distinction Excellence EviOTP NFC HSM Technology EviPass EviPass NFC HSM technology EviPass Technology finalists PassCypher PassCypher

Quantum-Resistant Passwordless Manager — PassCypher finalist, Intersec Awards 2026 (FIDO-free, RAM-only)

2025 Digital Security

Persistent OAuth Flaw: How Tycoon 2FA Hijacks Cloud Access

2025 Digital Security

Android Spyware Threat Clayrat : 2025 Analysis and Exposure

2025 Digital Security

Spyware ClayRat Android : faux WhatsApp espion mobile

2025 Digital Security Technical News

Sovereign SSH Authentication with PassCypher HSM PGP — Zero Key in Clear

2025 Digital Security Tech Fixes Security Solutions Technical News

SSH Key PassCypher HSM PGP — Sécuriser l’accès multi-OS à un VPS

For comprehensive threat assessments and innovative solutions, delve into “Human Limitations in Strong Passwords.” Stay informed by exploring our constantly updated topics..

Human Limitations in Strong Passwords,” authored by Jacques Gascuel, the visionary behind cutting-edge sensitive data security and safety systems, offers invaluable insights into the field of human-created password security. Are you ready to improve your understanding of password protection?

Human Limitations in Strong Passwords: Cybersecurity’s Weak Link

Passwords are essential for protecting our data on the Internet. But creating a strong password is not easy. It requires a balance between security and usability. In this article, we will explain what entropy is and how it measures the strength of a password. We will also explore the limitations and problems associated with human password creation. We will show that these factors reduce entropy and password security, exposing users to cyber attacks. We will also provide some strategies and tips to help users create stronger passwords.

What is Entropy and How Does it Measure Password Strength?

Entropy is a concept borrowed from information theory. It measures the unpredictability and randomness of a system. The higher the entropy, the more disordered the system is, and the harder it is to predict.

In the context of passwords, entropy measures how many attempts it would take to guess a password through brute force. In other words, entropy measures the difficulty of cracking a password. The higher the entropy, the stronger the password is, and the harder it is to crack.

However, entropy is not a fixed value, but a relative measure that depends on various factors, such as the length, composition, frequency, and popularity of the password. We will explain these factors in more detail later.

How Do Cognitive Biases Influence Password Creation?

Cognitive Biases in Password Creation

Cognitive biases, such as confirmation bias and anchoring bias, significantly influence how users create passwords. Understanding “Human Limitations in Strong Passwords” is essential to recognize and overcome these biases for better password security.

Cognitive biases are reasoning or judgment errors that affect how humans perceive and process information. They are often the result of heuristics, mental shortcuts used to simplify decision-making. These biases can have adaptive advantages but also lead to errors or distortions of reality.

In password creation, cognitive biases can influence user choices, leading to passwords that make sense to them, linked to their personal life, culture, environment, etc. These passwords are often predictable, following logical or mnemonic patterns, reducing entropy.

For example, humans are subject to confirmation bias, thinking their password is strong enough because it meets basic criteria like length or composition, without considering other factors like character frequency or diversity.

They are also prone to anchoring bias, choosing passwords based on personal information like names, birthdates, pets, etc., not realizing this information is easily accessible or guessable by hackers.

Availability bias leads to underestimating cyber attack risks because they haven’t been victims or witnesses of hacking, or they think their data isn’t interesting to hackers.

Human Factors in Strong Password Development: Cognitive Biases

Strategies to Overcome Cognitive Biases

To mitigate the impact of cognitive biases, consider adopting better password practices:

  • Utilize a different password for each service, especially for sensitive or critical accounts, such as email, banking, or social media.
  • Employ a password manager, which is a software or application that securely stores and generates passwords for each service. Password managers can assist users in creating and recalling strong, random passwords, all while maintaining security and convenience.
  • Implement two-factor authentication, a security feature that necessitates users to provide an additional verification method, such as a code sent to their phone or email, or a biometric scan, in order to access their accounts. Two-factor authentication can effectively thwart hackers from gaining access to accounts, even if they possess the password.
  • Regularly update passwords, but refrain from doing so excessively, in order to prevent compromise by hackers or data breaches. Users should change their passwords when they suspect or confirm a breach or when they detect suspicious activity on their accounts. It’s also advisable for users to avoid changing their passwords too frequently, as this can lead to weaker passwords or password reuse.

Addressing Human Challenges in Secure Password Creation with Freemindtronic’s Advanced Technologies

Understanding Human Constraints in Robust Password Generation

The process of creating strong passwords often clashes with human limitations. Freemindtronic’s EviPass NFC HSM and EviPass HSM PGP technologies, integral to the PassCypher range, acknowledge these human factors in strong password development. By automating the creation process and utilizing Shannon’s entropy model, these technologies effectively mitigate the cognitive biases that typically hinder the creation of secure passwords.

Password Security and the Fight Against Cyber Attacks

In the context of increasing cyber threats, the security of passwords becomes paramount. Freemindtronic’s solutions offer a robust defense against cyber attacks by generating passwords that exceed conventional security standards. This approach not only addresses the human challenges in creating strong passwords but also fortifies the digital identity protection of users.

Leveraging Entropy in Passwords for Enhanced Security

The concept of entropy in passwords is central to Freemindtronic’s technology. By harnessing advanced entropy models, these systems ensure a high level of randomness and complexity in password creation, significantly elevating password security. This technical sophistication is crucial in overcoming human limitations in generating secure passwords.

Cognitive Biases in Passwords: Simplifying User Experience

Freemindtronic’s technologies also focus on the human aspect of password usage. By reducing the cognitive load through features like auto-fill and passwordless access, these systems address common cognitive biases. This user-friendly approach not only enhances the ease of use but also contributes to the overall strategy for strong password management.

Adopting Strong Password Strategies for Digital Identity Protection

Incorporating strong password strategies is essential in safeguarding digital identities. Freemindtronic’s technologies empower users to adopt robust password practices effortlessly, thereby enhancing digital identity protection. This is achieved through the generation of complex passwords and the elimination of the need for manual password management.

Elevating Password Security in the Digital Age

Freemindtronic’s EviPass NFC HSM and EviPass HSM PGP technologies are at the forefront of addressing human limitations in strong password creation. By integrating advanced entropy in passwords, focusing on user-centric design, and combating the risks of cyber attacks, these technologies are setting new benchmarks in password security and digital identity protection. Their innovative approach not only acknowledges but also effectively overcomes the human challenges in secure password creation, marking a significant advancement in the field of digital security.

Human Constraints in Robust Password Generation

There are various methods to help users create strong, memorable passwords. These methods have pros and cons, which should be understood to choose the most suitable for one’s needs.

Mnemonic Passwords: Balancing Memory and Security

Mnemonic passwords are based on phrases or acronyms, serving as memory aids. For example, using the phrase “I was born in 1984 in Paris” to create the password “Iwbi1984iP”.

Advantages of mnemonic passwords:

  • Easier to remember than random passwords, using semantic memory, more effective than visual or auditory memory.
  • Can be longer than random passwords, composed of multiple words or syllables, increasing entropy.

Disadvantages of mnemonic passwords:

  • Often predictable, following logical or grammatical patterns, reducing entropy.
  • Vulnerable to dictionary attacks, containing common words or personal information, easily accessible or guessable by hackers.
  • Difficult to type, containing special characters like accents or spaces, not always available on keyboards.

The Trade-Off Between Mnemonics and Entropy

To balance memory and security, users should use mnemonics that are not too obvious or common, but rather personal and unique. They should also avoid using the same mnemonic for different passwords, or using slight variations of the same mnemonic. They should also add some randomness or complexity to their mnemonics, such as numbers, symbols, or capitalization.

Random Passwords: Entropy and Ease of Use

Random passwords are composed of randomly chosen characters, without logic or meaning. For example, the password “qW7x#4Rt”.

Advantages of random passwords:

  • Harder to guess than mnemonic passwords, not following predictable patterns, increasing entropy.
  • More resistant to dictionary attacks, not containing common words or personal information.

Disadvantages of random passwords:

  • Harder to remember than mnemonic passwords, not using semantic memory.
  • Can be shorter than mnemonic passwords, composed of individual characters, reducing entropy.

Phrase-Based Passwords: Entropy and Ease of Use

Phrase-based passwords are composed of several words forming a phrase or expression. For example, the password “The cat sleeps on the couch”.

Advantages of phrase-based passwords:

  • Easier to remember than random passwords, using semantic memory.
  • Can be longer than random passwords, composed of multiple words, increasing entropy.

Disadvantages of phrase-based passwords:

  • Often predictable, following logical or grammatical patterns, reducing entropy.
  • Vulnerable to dictionary attacks, containing common words or expressions.
  • Difficult to type, containing spaces, not always accepted by online services.

Evaluating Phrase-Based Password Effectiveness

To evaluate the effectiveness of phrase-based passwords, users should consider the following criteria:

  • Phrase length plays a crucial role: Longer phrases tend to result in higher entropy. However, it’s important to strike a balance, as excessively long phrases can become challenging to type or recall.
  • The diversity of words also matters: Greater word diversity contributes to higher entropy. Nevertheless, it’s essential to avoid overly obscure words, as they might prove difficult to remember or spell.
  • Randomness in word selection boosts entropy: The more random the words, the greater the entropy. Yet, it’s necessary to maintain some level of coherence between words, as entirely unrelated words can pose memory and association challenges.

Human-Generated Random Passwords: Entropy and Ease of Use

Human-generated random passwords are composed of randomly chosen characters by the user, without logic or meaning. For example, the password “qW7x#4Rt”.

Advantages :

  • Harder to guess than mnemonic or phrase-based passwords, increasing entropy.
  • More resistant to dictionary attacks, not containing common words or personal information.

Disadvantages:

  • Harder to remember than mnemonic or phrase-based passwords.
  • Often biased by user preferences or habits, favoring certain characters or keyboard positions, reducing entropy.

The Risks of Low Entropy in Human-Created Passwords

Low entropy passwords have significant consequences on the security of personal and professional data. Weak passwords are more vulnerable to cyber attacks, especially brute force. Hackers can use powerful software or machines to test billions of combinations per second. Once the password is found, they can access user accounts, steal data, impersonate, or spread viruses or spam.

Consequences of Predictable Passwords on Cybersecurity

The consequences of predictable passwords on cybersecurity are:

  • Data breach: Hackers can access user data, such as personal information, financial records, health records, etc. They can use this data for identity theft, fraud, blackmail, or sell it to third parties.
  • Account takeover: Hackers can access user accounts, such as email, social media, online shopping, etc. They can use these accounts to impersonate users, send spam, make purchases, or spread malware.
  • Reputation damage: Hackers can access user accounts, such as professional or academic platforms, etc. They can use these accounts to damage user reputation, post false or harmful information, or sabotage user work or research.

Understanding the Vulnerability of Low Entropy Passwords

Password Length and Entropy

The vulnerability of passwords depends on various factors, including the length, composition, frequency, and popularity of the password. Understanding “Human Limitations in Strong Passwords” is crucial for safeguarding your online data. Longer and more complex passwords offer higher entropy and are harder to crack.

Composition Complexity

Complex passwords that include a variety of character types, such as lowercase, uppercase, numbers, and symbols, significantly enhance security. This aspect of “Human Limitations in Strong Passwords” is often overlooked, but it’s essential for creating robust passwords.

Common vs. Rare Passwords

The frequency and popularity of passwords play a vital role in their vulnerability. Common passwords, like “123456” or “password,” are easily guessed, while rare and unique passwords, such as “qW7x#4Rt” or “The cat sleeps on the couch,” provide more security.

Password Composition

The composition of a password is a critical factor. Passwords based on common words or personal information are easier for hackers to guess. Understanding the impact of “Human Limitations in Strong Passwords” can help you make informed choices about password composition.

These factors collectively influence the time required for brute force attacks to uncover a password. Longer durations enhance password security, but it’s essential to consider the evolving computing power of hackers, which can reduce the time required to crack passwords over time and with advancing technology. Another factor that affects the vulnerability of passwords is their frequency and popularity.

Recurring Password Changes: A Challenge to Password Entropy

Another human limitation in creating strong passwords is the recurrent need to change them. Often mandated by online services for security, regular changes can paradoxically weaken password strength. This practice burdens users with remembering multiple passwords and inventing new ones frequently. It leads to slight modifications of existing passwords rather than generating new, more random ones. This habit reduces password entropy, making passwords more predictable and vulnerable to cyber attacks.

Impact of Frequent Password Updates on Security

Studies have shown that users required to change passwords every 90 days tend to create weaker, less diverse passwords. Conversely, those with less frequent changes generate more random and secure passwords. This illustrates the counterproductive nature of too-frequent mandatory password updates.

The Counterproductive Nature of Mandatory Password Changes

Mandatory password changes are often imposed by online services for security reasons. They aim to prevent password compromise by hackers or leaks. However, mandatory password changes can have negative effects on password security, such as:

  • Elevating cognitive load entails users remembering multiple passwords for each service and crafting new passwords whenever needed.
  • Dampening user motivation occurs when individuals view password changes as unnecessary or ineffective, leading to a neglect of password quality.
  • Diminishing password entropy arises when users opt for making slight modifications to old passwords rather than generating entirely new and random ones.

These effects negatively impact password security, making passwords more predictable and vulnerable to cyber attacks.

Research Insights on Low Entropy in Human Passwords

In this section, we will present some sources and findings from scientific studies conducted by researchers from around the world on passwords and entropy. We have verified the validity and accuracy of these sources using web search and citation verification tools. We have also respected the APA citation style.

Analyzing Global Studies on Password Security

Several studies have analyzed the security of passwords based on real databases of passwords disclosed following leaks or hacks. These studies have measured the entropy and the strength of passwords, as well as the patterns and the behaviors of users. Some of these studies are:

Key Findings from Password Entropy Research

Some of the key findings from these studies are:

  • any users maintain low-entropy passwords, relying on common words, personal information, or predictable patterns.
  • Furthermore, they tend to reuse passwords across multiple services, thereby elevating the risk of cross-service compromise.
  • In addition, they typically refrain from changing passwords regularly, unless prompted to do so by online services or following a security breach.
  • Surprisingly, a significant portion of users remains unaware of the critical importance of password security or tends to overestimate the strength of their passwords.
  • Moreover, a considerable number of users exhibit reluctance towards the adoption of password managers or two-factor authentication, often citing usability or trust concerns.

These findings confirm the low entropy of human passwords, and the need for better password practices and education.

Password Reuse and Its Impact on Entropy

Another issue with human password creation is password reuse, a common practice among Internet users, who have to remember multiple passwords for different services. Password reuse consists of using the same or similar passwords for different accounts, such as email, social media, online shopping, etc. Password reuse can reduce the cognitive load and the effort required to create and remember passwords, but it also reduces the entropy and the security of passwords.

The Risks Associated with Password Reuse

The risks associated with password reuse are:

  • Cross-service compromise: If a password is discovered or compromised on one service, it can be used to access other services that use the same or similar password. For example, if a hacker obtains a user’s email password, they can use it to access their social media, online shopping, or banking accounts, if they use the same password or a slight variation of it.
  • Credential stuffing: Credential stuffing is a type of cyberattack that uses automated tools to test stolen or leaked usernames and passwords on multiple services. For example, if a hacker obtains a list of usernames and passwords from a data breach, they can use it to try to log in to other services, hoping that some users have reused their passwords.
  • Password cracking: Password cracking is a type of cyberattack that uses brute force or dictionary methods to guess passwords. For example, if a hacker obtains a user’s password hash, they can use it to try to find the plain text password, using lists of common or leaked passwords.

These risks show that password reuse can expose users to cyber threats, as a single password breach can compromise multiple accounts and data. Password reuse can also reduce the entropy of passwords, as users tend to use common or simple passwords that are easy to remember and type, but also easy to guess or crack.

Addressing the Security Flaws of Reusing Passwords

To mitigate the security vulnerabilities associated with password reuse, users should embrace improved practices for password creation and management. Some of these recommended practices include:

  • Utilize distinct passwords for each service, particularly for sensitive or crucial accounts such as email, banking, or social media. This approach ensures that if one password is compromised, it won’t jeopardize other accounts or data.
  • Employ a password manager, which is software or an application designed to securely store and generate passwords for each service. Password managers assist users in crafting and recalling strong, randomly generated passwords, all while upholding security and convenience. Additionally, these tools can notify users about password breaches or weak passwords, as well as suggest password changes or updates.
  • Implement two-factor authentication (2FA), a security feature demanding users to provide an additional verification method, such as a code sent to their phone or email, or a biometric scan. This extra layer of security thwarts hackers from gaining access to accounts solely through knowledge of the password, as they would require the second factor as well.
  • Adopt a regular password change strategy, though not excessively frequent, to preempt compromise by hackers or data leaks. Passwords should be modified when users suspect or verify a breach, or when they detect suspicious activity on their accounts. It’s also advisable to avoid changing passwords too frequently, as this can potentially result in weaker passwords or password reuse.

These practices can help users avoid password reuse and increase the entropy and security of their passwords. They can also reduce the cognitive load and the effort required to create and remember passwords, by using tools and features that simplify password creation and management.

Behavioral Resistance in Secure Password Practices

Another issue with human password creation is resistance to behavioral changes, a psychological phenomenon preventing users from adopting new habits or modifying old ones regarding passwords. Users are often reluctant to change passwords, even when aware of risks or encouraged to do so. This resistance can be due to factors like laziness, ignorance, confidence, fear, satisfaction, etc.

Overcoming Psychological Barriers in Password Security

Psychological barriers can hinder password security, as users may not follow the best practices or recommendations to create stronger passwords. To overcome these barriers, users need to be aware of the importance and benefits of password security, as well as the costs and risks of password insecurity. Some of the ways to overcome psychological barriers are:

  • Educating users about password security, explaining what entropy is, how it measures password strength, and how to increase it.
  • Motivating users to change passwords, providing incentives, feedback, or rewards for creating stronger passwords.
  • Persuading users to adopt password managers, demonstrating how they can simplify password creation and management, without compromising security or convenience.
  • Nudging users to use two-factor authentication, making it easy and accessible to enable and use this security feature.

Conclusion: Reinforcing Password Security Amidst Human Limitations

In this article, we have explained what entropy is and how it measures the strength of a password. We also explored the limitations and problems associated with human password creation, such as cognitive biases, human generation methods, password reuse, and resistance to behavioral changes. We have shown that these factors reduce entropy and password security, exposing users to cyber attacks. We have also provided some strategies and tips to help users create stronger passwords.

We hope this article has helped you understand the importance of password security and improve your password practices. Remember, passwords protect your digital identity and data online. Creating strong passwords is not only a matter of security, but also of responsibility.

Terrapin attack: How to Protect Yourself from this New Threat to SSH Security

SSH handshake with Terrapin attack and EviKey NFC HSM

Terrapin Attack: How to Protect Your SSH Security

The Terrapin attack is a serious vulnerability in the SSH protocol that can be used to downgrade the security of your SSH connections. This can allow attackers to gain access to your sensitive data. In this article, we will explain what the Terrapin attack is, how it works, and how you can protect yourself from it.

2025 Cyberculture Cybersecurity Digital Security EviLink

CryptPeer messagerie P2P WebRTC : appels directs chiffrés de bout en bout

2026 Awards Cyberculture Digital Security Distinction Excellence EviOTP NFC HSM Technology EviPass EviPass NFC HSM technology EviPass Technology finalists PassCypher PassCypher

Quantum-Resistant Passwordless Manager — PassCypher finalist, Intersec Awards 2026 (FIDO-free, RAM-only)

2025 Digital Security

Persistent OAuth Flaw: How Tycoon 2FA Hijacks Cloud Access

2025 Digital Security

Android Spyware Threat Clayrat : 2025 Analysis and Exposure

2025 Digital Security

Spyware ClayRat Android : faux WhatsApp espion mobile

2025 Digital Security Technical News

Sovereign SSH Authentication with PassCypher HSM PGP — Zero Key in Clear

2025 Digital Security Tech Fixes Security Solutions Technical News

SSH Key PassCypher HSM PGP — Sécuriser l’accès multi-OS à un VPS

Terrapin attack: CVE-2023-48795 SSH security vulnerability articles for in-depth threat reviews and solutions. Stay informed by clicking on our scrolling topics.

Shield Your SSH Security from the Sneaky Terrapin Attack written by Jacques Gascuel, inventor of sensitive data safety and security systems. Are you safeguarding your SSH connections? Stay vigilant against the Terrapin attack, a stealthy vulnerability that can compromise your SSH security and expose your sensitive data.

Protect Yourself from the Terrapin Attack: Shield Your SSH Security with Proven Strategies

SSH is a widely used protocol for secure communication over the internet. It allows you to remotely access and control servers, transfer files, and encrypt data. However, SSH is not immune to attacks, and a recent vulnerability OpenSSH before 9.6 (CVE-2023-48795) has exposed a serious flaw in the protocol itself. This flaw, dubbed the Terrapin attack, can downgrade the security of SSH connections by truncating cryptographic information. In this article, we will explain what the Terrapin attack is, how it works, and how you can protect yourself from it.

Why you should care about the Terrapin attack

The Terrapin attack is not just a theoretical threat. It is a real and dangerous attack that can compromise the security of your SSH connections and expose your sensitive data. The consequences of a successful Terrapin attack can be severe, such as:

  • Data breaches: The attacker can access your confidential information, such as passwords, keys, files, or commands, and use them for malicious purposes.
  • Financial losses: The attacker can cause damage to your systems, services, or assets, and demand ransom or extort money from you.
  • Reputation damage: The attacker can leak your data to the public or to your competitors, and harm your credibility or trustworthiness.

Therefore, it is important to be aware of the Terrapin attack and take the necessary measures to prevent it. In the following sections, we will show you how the Terrapin attack works, how to protect yourself from it, and how to use PassCypher HSM PGP and EviKey NFC HSM to enhance the security of your SSH keys.

A prefix truncation attack on the SSH protocol

The Terrapin attack is a prefix truncation attack that targets the SSH protocol. It exploits a deficiency in the protocol specification, namely not resetting sequence numbers and not authenticating certain parts of the handshake transcript. By carefully adjusting the sequence numbers during the handshake, an attacker can remove an arbitrary amount of messages sent by the client or server at the beginning of the secure channel without the client or server noticing it.

This manipulation allows the attacker to perform several malicious actions, such as:

  • Downgrade the connection’s security by forcing it to use less secure client authentication algorithms
  • Bypass the keystroke timing obfuscation feature in OpenSSH, which may allow the attacker to brute-force SSH passwords by inspecting the network packets
  • Exploit vulnerabilities in SSH implementations, such as AsyncSSH, which may allow the attacker to sign a victim’s client into another account without the victim noticing

To pull off a Terrapin attack, the attacker must already be able to intercept and modify the data sent from the client or server to the remote peer. This makes the attack more feasible to be performed on the local network.

Unveiling the SSH Handshake: Exposing the Terrapin Attack’s Weakness

The SSH Handshake Process

The SSH handshake is a crucial process that establishes a secure channel between a client and server. It consists of the following steps:

  1. TCP connection establishment: The client initiates a TCP connection to the server.
  2. Protocol version exchange: The client and server exchange their protocol versions and agree on a common one. Then, the algorithm negotiation takes place.
  3. Algorithm negotiation: The client and server exchange lists of supported algorithms for key exchange, encryption, MAC, and compression. Then, they select the first matching algorithm.
  4. Key exchange: The client and server use the agreed-upon key exchange algorithm to generate a shared secret key. They also exchange and verify each other’s public keys. Then, the service request is sent.
  5. Service request: The client requests a service from the server, such as ssh-userauth or ssh-connection. Then, the client authenticates itself to the server using a supported method, such as password, public key, or keyboard-interactive.
  6. User authentication: The client authenticates itself to the server using a supported method, such as password, public key, or keyboard-interactive. Then, the channel request is sent.
  7. Channel request: The client requests a channel from the server, such as a shell, a command, or a subsystem. Thus, encrypted communication is enabled.

The Terrapin Attack

The Terrapin attack exploits a vulnerability in the SSH handshake by manipulating the sequence numbers and removing specific messages without compromising the secure channel integrity. This stealthy attack is difficult to detect because it doesn’t alter the overall structure or cryptographic integrity of the handshake.

For example, the attacker can eliminate the service request message sent by the client, which contains the list of supported client authentication methods. This forces the server to resort to the default method, typically password-based authentication. The attacker can then employ keystroke timing analysis to crack the password.

Alternatively, the attacker can target the algorithm negotiation message sent by the server, which lists the supported server authentication algorithms. By removing this message, the attacker forces the client to use the default algorithm, usually ssh-rsa. This opens the door for the attacker to forge a fake public key for the server and deceive the client into accepting it.

To illustrate the process of a Terrapin attack, we have created the following diagram:

Hackers exploit OAuth2 flaw to bypass 2FA on google accounts google account security flaw
Hackers exploit OAuth2 flaw to bypass 2FA on google accounts google account security flaw

As you can see, the diagram shows the steps from the interception of the communication by the attacker to the injection of malicious packets. It also highlights the stealthiness and the difficulty of detection of the attack.

Summery

The Terrapin attack is a serious threat to SSH security. By understanding how it works, you can take steps to protect yourself from it. Here are some tips:

  1. Make sure your SSH server is up to date with the latest security patches.
  2. Use strong passwords or public key authentication.
  3. Enable SSH key fingerprint verification.

How to protect yourself from the Terrapin attack: Best practices and tools

The Terrapin attack is a serious threat to SSH security, and it affects many SSH client and server implementations, such as OpenSSH, PuTTY, FileZilla, and more. Here are some steps you can take to protect yourself from it:

  • Update your SSH client and server to the latest versions. Many vendors have released patches that fix the vulnerability or introduce a strict key exchange option that prevents the attack. You can check if your SSH software is vulnerable by using the Terrapin vulnerability scanner.
  • Use strong passwords and public key authentication. Avoid using weak or default passwords that can be easily guessed by the attacker. Use public key authentication instead of password authentication, and make sure your public keys are verified and trusted.
  • Use secure encryption modes. Avoid using vulnerable encryption modes, such as ChaCha20-Poly1305 or AES-CBC with default MACs. Use encryption modes that use authenticated encryption with associated data (AEAD), such as AES-GCM or Chacha20-Poly1305@openssh.com.
  • Use a VPN or a firewall. If possible, use a VPN or a firewall to encrypt and protect your SSH traffic from being intercepted and modified by the attacker. This will also prevent the attacker from performing other types of attacks, such as DNS spoofing or TCP hijacking.
  • Implement a strict security policy on your local networks. Limit the access to your SSH servers to authorized users and devices, and monitor the network activity for any anomalies or intrusions.

How to use PassCypher HSM PGP and EviKey NFC HSM to protect your SSH keys: A secure and convenient solution

A good way to enhance the security of your SSH keys is to use PassCypher HSM PGP and EviKey NFC HSM. These are products from PassCypher), a company specialized in data security. They offer a secure and convenient solution for generating and storing your SSH keys.

PassCypher HSM PGP is a system that embeds a SSH key generator, allowing you to choose the type of algorithm – RSA (2048, 3072, 4096) or ECDSA (256,384, 521), and ED25519. The private key is generated and stored in a secure location, making it inaccessible to attackers.

EviKey NFC HSM is a contactless USB drive that integrates with PassCypher HSM PGP. It provides an additional layer of security and convenience for users who can easily unlock their private SSH key with their smartphone.

To show how PassCypher HSM PGP and EviKey NFC HSM can protect your SSH keys from the Terrapin attack, we have created the following diagram:

SSH handshake process with Terrapin attack illustration
This image illustrates the Terrapin attack, a stealthy attack that exploits a vulnerability in the SSH handshake. The attacker can manipulate the sequence numbers and remove specific messages without compromising the secure channel integrity. This can lead to a variety of security risks, including password cracking and man-in-the-middle attacks.

As you can see, the diagram shows how this solution effectively protects your SSH keys from the Terrapin attack. It also shows the benefits of using a contactless USB drive, such as:

  • Enhanced security: The private key is physically externalized and protected with a contactless authentication mechanism.
  • Convenience: Easy unlocking with a smartphone.
  • Ease of use: No additional software required.
  • Industrial-grade security: Equivalent to SL4 according to the standard IEC 62443-3-3.

Safeguarding Your SSH Keys with a Contactless USB Drive: A Comprehensive Guide

If you’re seeking a comprehensive guide to securely store your SSH keys using a contactless USB drive, look no further than this detailed resource: [Link to the article ([https://freemindtronic.com/how-to-create-an-ssh-key-and-use-a-nfc-hsm-usb-drive-to-store-it-securely/])]

This guide meticulously walks you through the process of:

  1. Generating an SSH key pair leveraging PassCypher HSM PGP
  2. Protecting the private SSH key within the EviKey NFC HSM USB drive
  3. Unlocking the private SSH key employing your smartphone
  4. Establishing a secure connection to an SSH server using the EviKey NFC HSM USB drive

Alongside step-by-step instructions, the guide also includes illustrative screenshots. By adhering to these guidelines, you’ll effectively safeguard and conveniently manage your SSH keys using a contactless USB drive.

Statistics on the Terrapin attack: Facts and figures

Statistics on the Terrapin attack: Facts and figures

The Terrapin attack is a serious cybersecurity threat that affects SSH connections. We have collected some statistics from various sources to show you the scale and impact of this attack. Here are some key facts and figures:

  • The Shadowserver Foundation reports that nearly 11 million SSH servers exposed on the internet are vulnerable to the Terrapin attack. This is about 52% of all IPv4 and IPv6 addresses scanned by their monitoring system.
  • The most affected countries are the United States (3.3 million), China (1.3 million), Germany (1 million), Russia (704,000), Singapore (392,000), Japan (383,000), and France (379,000).
  • The Terrapin attack affects many SSH client and server implementations, such as OpenSSH, PuTTY, FileZilla, Dropbear, libssh, and more. You can see the complete list of known affected implementations here).
  • You can prevent the Terrapin attack by updating your SSH software to the latest version, using secure encryption modes, and enabling strict key exchange. You can also use the Terrapin vulnerability scanner, available on GitHub, to check your SSH client or server for vulnerability.
  • A team of researchers from the Horst Görtz Institute for IT Security at Ruhr University Bochum in Germany discovered and disclosed the Terrapin attack. They published a detailed paper and a website with the technical details and the implications of the attack. Conclusion: How to stay safe from the Terrapin attack

The Terrapin attack is a serious threat to SSH security. It lets hackers break into SSH servers by exploiting a vulnerability in the protocol. To protect yourself effectively, you need to do the following:

  • Update your SSH software to the latest version
  • Use two-factor authentication
  • Store your SSH keys securely
  • Use PassCypher HSM PGP and EviKey NFC HSM

Conclusion: How to stay safe from the Terrapin attack

The Terrapin attack is a serious threat to SSH security. It allows hackers to break into SSH servers by exploiting a vulnerability in the protocol. To protect yourself effectively, you need to update your SSH software, use two-factor authentication, store your SSH keys securely, and use PassCypher HSM PGP and EviKey NFC HSM. If you found this article useful, please feel free to share it with your contacts or leave us a comment.

Telegram and the Information War in Ukraine

Telegram and the information war in Ukraine
Telegram and the Information War in Ukraine written by Jacques Gascuel, inventor of sensitive data safety and security systems, for Freemindtronic. This article may be updated on this subject.

How Telegram Shapes the Information War in Ukraine

In this article, we explore how Telegram and Ukraine’s information warfare are intertwined. We look at how the messaging app is influencing the Russia-Ukraine conflict, and how it can be used for good or evil. We also discuss the benefits and risks of using Telegram, as well as how security and freedom of expression can be enhanced with EviCypher NFC HSM technology.

2025 Cyberculture Cybersecurity Digital Security EviLink

CryptPeer messagerie P2P WebRTC : appels directs chiffrés de bout en bout

2026 Awards Cyberculture Digital Security Distinction Excellence EviOTP NFC HSM Technology EviPass EviPass NFC HSM technology EviPass Technology finalists PassCypher PassCypher

Quantum-Resistant Passwordless Manager — PassCypher finalist, Intersec Awards 2026 (FIDO-free, RAM-only)

2025 Digital Security

Persistent OAuth Flaw: How Tycoon 2FA Hijacks Cloud Access

2025 Digital Security

Android Spyware Threat Clayrat : 2025 Analysis and Exposure

2025 Digital Security

Spyware ClayRat Android : faux WhatsApp espion mobile

2025 Digital Security Technical News

Sovereign SSH Authentication with PassCypher HSM PGP — Zero Key in Clear

2025 Digital Security Tech Fixes Security Solutions Technical News

SSH Key PassCypher HSM PGP — Sécuriser l’accès multi-OS à un VPS

How Telegram Influences the Conflict between Russia and Ukraine

Telegram and the information war in Ukraine are closely related. Telegram is a messaging app that offers users a secure and confidential way to communicate, thanks to its end-to-end encryption system. It has a large user base around the world, especially in Eastern Europe, where it plays a vital role in the information war between Russia and Ukraine.

Telegram’s Usage in Ukraine: Updated Statistics

Popularity and Download Trends

According to the report of the research company SimilarWeb, Telegram is the second most downloaded messaging app in Ukraine, after Viber, with 3.8 million downloads in 2021. It is also the fourth most used app in terms of time spent, with an average of 16 minutes per day. Telegram has about 10 million active users in Ukraine, which is almost a quarter of the country’s population.

Telegram’s Role in Ukrainian Media Landscape

Telegram is particularly appreciated by Ukrainians for its channel functionality, which allows to broadcast messages to a large audience. Some of these channels have become influential but controversial sources of information, as their owners and sources are often unknown. Among the most popular channels in Ukraine, we can mention:

  • @Zelenskyi, the official channel of President Volodymyr Zelensky, which has more than 2 million subscribers. It publishes announcements, speeches, interviews and videos of the head of state. It was created in 2019, during Zelensky’s election campaign, who was then an actor and a comedian.
  • @NashyGroshi, the channel of the journalistic project “Our Money”, which has more than 1.5 million subscribers. It publishes investigations, reports and analyses on corruption, abuse of power, political scandals and judicial cases in Ukraine. It was created in 2008, by journalist Denys Bihus, who received several awards for his work.
  • @Resident, the channel of blogger and activist Anatoliy Shariy, which has more than 1.3 million subscribers. It publishes comments, criticisms and sarcasms on the political and social news in Ukraine. He is known for his pro-Russian, anti-European and anti-government positions. He is currently in exile in Spain, where he is wanted by the Ukrainian justice for high treason and incitement to hatred.

These channels illustrate the diversity and complexity of the Ukrainian media landscape, which is marked by the conflict with Russia, the democratic transition, the fight against corruption and the polarization of society. They are also a reflection of the issues and challenges related to the use of Telegram, which can be both a tool of communication, information and manipulation.

Oleksiy Danilov’s Stance on Telegram’s Usage in Ukraine

Concerns Over National Security

Oleksiy Danilov is the secretary of the National Security and Defense Council of Ukraine, the body responsible for coordinating and controlling the activities of the executive bodies in the fields of national security and defense. He is also the head of cybersecurity of the country, and in this capacity, he expressed his reservations about the use of Telegram by Ukrainians. In February 2022, he stated that some anonymous and manipulative Telegram channels represented a threat to national security, and that they should be de-anonymized and regulated. He particularly targeted the channel @Resident, which broadcasts pro-Russian and anti-Ukrainian comments, and which is suspected of being linked to the Russian intelligence services. He also criticized the channel @Zelenskyi, which according to him, is not controlled by the Ukrainian president, but by advisers who seek to influence his policy.

Debating Telegram’s Influence in Ukraine

These statements provoked mixed reactions in Ukraine. Some supported Danilov’s position, believing that it was necessary to fight against misinformation and propaganda that undermine the sovereignty and democracy of the country. Others denounced an attempt at censorship and an attack on freedom of expression, recalling that Telegram was one of the few spaces where Ukrainians could access independent and diverse information.

How Telegram Influences the Information War in Ukraine

The Benefits and Risks of End-to-End Encryption

Telegram is a messaging app that lets you send messages, photos, videos, documents, and make voice and video calls. Its privacy policy is based on data encryption and non-cooperation with authorities. You can also create groups and channels that can reach thousands or millions of users.

End-to-end encryption is a technology that makes sure only the people in a conversation can read the messages, not even the service provider. Telegram has this option, but it is not on by default. You have to choose it for each chat, by switching to the “secret chat” mode. However, Telegram’s encryption is not based on standard protocols, and security experts have found some flaws.

Anonymous Channels and Their Impact on the Ukrainian Conflict

The channels are spaces where an administrator can send messages to a large audience. They can be public or private, and they can have millions of followers. Some channels are influential but controversial sources of information, as their owners and sources are often unknown. The channels can spread misinformation, propaganda, fake news, or violence.

Telegram and Russian propaganda have a strong connection, as many pro-Russian channels use the app to influence the public opinion in Ukraine and other countries. Telegram and the Ukrainian resistance also use the app to communicate and organize their actions against the Russian aggression.

Bots, Payment Services and Unique Usernames: A Double-Edged Sword

Bots are programs that interact with users. They offer services, information, or entertainment. Anyone can create them. They can be part of chats or channels. Bots can be helpful or harmful. They can collect personal data, send spam, or spread viruses.

Payment Services: Handy or Dishonest?

You can also use payment services via Telegram. These features use third-party platforms, such as Stripe or Apple Pay. They need bank or credit card information. Payment services can be handy or dishonest. They can steal sensitive data, scam users, or fund illegal activities.

Unique Usernames: Fun or Troublesome?

Another feature of Telegram is the unique usernames. They let users contact each other easily, without sharing their phone number. Users can create and change them at any time. Unique usernames can be fun or troublesome. They can enable harassment, identity theft, or account sale.

These features of Telegram raise issues of cybersecurity, privacy, end-to-end encryption, and application security. They can be used by bad actors, who want to harm Ukraine or its people. They can also be regulated by the authorities, who want to control the information or access the data of the users.

Telegram and the Information War in Ukraine: A Challenge

One of the main challenges of Telegram and the information war in Ukraine is to balance the freedom of expression and the protection of national security. Telegram and the Ukrainian conflict are closely intertwined. The app is used by both sides to communicate, inform, and influence. Telegram and Russian propaganda have a strong connection. Many pro-Russian channels use the app to sway the public opinion in Ukraine and other countries. Telegram and the Ukrainian resistance also use the app to coordinate and organize their actions against the Russian aggression. Telegram and cybersecurity in Ukraine are also crucial. The app can be a source of threats or a tool of defense.

Telegram VS Other Messaging Apps: A Comparative Analysis

WhatsApp: Popular but Questionable Confidentiality

WhatsApp is the most popular messaging app in the world, with more than 2 billion users. It offers end-to-end encryption by default for all conversations, which guarantees the protection of data. However, it belongs to Facebook, which has a dubious reputation in terms of respect for privacy, and which has raised fears about the sharing of data with other applications of the group. WhatsApp is also subject to the requests of the authorities, who can demand access to the metadata, such as the phone number, the IP address or the location of the users.

Signal: High Security but Limited User Base

Signal is a messaging app that claims to be the most secure and confidential on the market. It also offers end-to-end encryption by default for all conversations, and it does not collect any personal data. It is developed by a non-profit organization, which does not depend on advertising or investors. It is recommended by personalities such as Edward Snowden or Elon Musk. Signal is however less popular than WhatsApp or Telegram, with about 50 million users. It also offers fewer features, such as file sharing, information channels, bots or payment services.

Telegram: Innovative but Security Concerns

Telegram is between these two apps, offering more features than Signal, but less security than WhatsApp. Telegram allows users to choose the level of encryption and privacy they want, by opting for the “secret chat” mode or the “normal chat” mode. Telegram also allows users to enjoy innovative services, such as channels, bots, payments or unique usernames. However, Telegram also presents risks, such as fakes news, inappropriate content, privacy breaches or cyberattacks. Telegram is therefore an app that offers advantages and disadvantages, and that requires vigilance and discernment from users.

Telegram’s Global Perception and Regulation

Russia: Origin and Opposition

Russia is the country of origin of Telegram, but also its main adversary. The Kremlin tried to block the app in 2018, invoking reasons of national security and fight against terrorism. It demanded that Telegram provide it with the encryption keys to access the messages of the users, which Pavel Durov refused. It then ordered the telecom operators to block access to Telegram, but this measure proved ineffective, as Telegram used cloud servers to bypass the blocking. Many Russian users also use VPNs or proxies to access the app. In 2020, the Kremlin finally lifted the ban on Telegram, acknowledging its failure and stating that the app had cooperated with the authorities to remove extremist content. However, some observers suspect that Telegram made concessions to the Kremlin to lift the blocking, such as collaborating with the Russian services or censoring some channels.

France: Striving for Digital Regulation

France is a country that wants to be at the forefront of the regulation of digital platforms, especially in terms of fighting online hate. It adopted in 2020 a law that obliges the platforms to remove illegal content, such as incitement to violence, discrimination or terrorism, within 24 hours, under penalty of financial sanctions. This law also applies to messaging apps, such as Telegram, which must set up reporting and moderation mechanisms for content. France recognizes the right of users to privacy and end-to-end encryption, but it also asks the service providers to cooperate with the law enforcement to access the encrypted data when needed. France is also a country where Telegram is used by radical groups, such as jihadists or yellow vests, who take advantage of the app to organize, mobilize or defend themselves.

Ukraine: Balancing Utility and Risks

Ukraine is a country that has an ambivalent attitude towards Telegram, recognizing its usefulness, but also its dangers. On the one hand, Telegram is a source of information and a tool of resistance for many Ukrainians, who face the threat of Russian aggression and the challenges of democratic transition. On the other hand, Telegram is also a vector of misinformation and propaganda, which can undermine the sovereignty and stability of the country. Ukraine does not have a specific law to regulate Telegram, but it has some legal provisions to protect national security and public order, which can be used to restrict or block the app if necessary. Ukraine also cooperates with international organizations, such as the EU or NATO, to counter the cyber threats and the hybrid warfare that target the country.

EviCypher NFC HSM: Enhancing Telegram’s Security

The Role of Contactless Encryption Technology

One of the main challenges of using Telegram is to ensure the security and confidentiality of the data exchanged, especially in a context of information war. To meet this challenge, a possible solution consists of using EviCypher NFC HSM technology, which is a contactless encryption technology developed by Freemindtronic, an Andorran company specializing in the design of counter-espionage solutions implementing in particular contactless security with NFC technology. EviCypher NFC HSM uses two types of encryption algorithms for data:

  • Symmetric encryption in AES-256 for data such as texts (messages), thanks to its sub-technology EviCrypt. It uses a unique key, which is randomly generated and segmented into several parts. This key is used to encrypt and decrypt messages with the AES 256-bit algorithm.
  • Asymmetric encryption in RSA-4096 for symmetric encryption keys. It uses a pair of keys, which is generated and used from the NFC HSM device and which is based on the RSA 4096-bit algorithm. This pair of keys is used to share the symmetric key of at least 256 bits between the NFC HSM devices remotely, by encrypting the symmetric key with the public key of the recipient and decrypting the symmetric key with the private key of the recipient. The symmetric key is then stored and re-encrypted in the NFC HSM device of the recipient, with the trust criteria imposed by the sender if he has encapsulated them in the shared encryption key.

Practical Applications of EviCypher NFC HSM

EviCypher NFC HSM is a technology that uses hardware security modules (HSM) to store and use encrypted secrets. It allows contactless encryption with the NFC communication protocol. You can integrate the NFC HSM into various media, such as a card, a sticker, or a key ring. Then, you can pair it with an NFC phone, tablet, or computer. This way, you can encrypt everything before using any messaging service, including Telegram. EviCypher NFC HSM also has anti-cloning, anti-replay, and counterfeit detection mechanisms. It is part of the DataShielder product range, which offers serverless and databaseless encryption solutions.

Telegram and the Ukrainian conflict

EviCypher NFC HSM is compatible with Telegram, a messaging app that influences the information war between Russia and Ukraine. It offers more security and confidentiality than Telegram’s end-to-end encryption, which is not based on recognized standards. It also gives you more flexibility and control than Telegram’s secret chat mode, as you can choose the trust criteria for the encryption keys. Moreover, it is more convenient and simple than Telegram’s normal chat mode, as you can encrypt and decrypt messages with a simple gesture.

Telegram and cybersecurity in Ukraine

EviCypher NFC HSM is a useful technology with Telegram, as it enhances the security and confidentiality of the data exchanged, especially in a context of information war. It is also a universal technology, as you can use it with any other messaging app, such as WhatsApp, Signal, Messenger, etc. It is also an innovative technology, as it uses the NFC communication protocol to perform contactless encryption, without requiring any connection or installation.

Concluding Insights on Telegram’s Role in Ukraine

In this article, we have seen how Telegram plays a vital role in the information war between Russia and Ukraine, and what issues and challenges there are in using this messaging app. We have also seen how the technology EviCypher NFC HSM can be a useful solution to enhance the security and confidentiality of the data exchanged with Telegram. We hope that this article has been informative and interesting for you, and that it has helped you to better understand the situation of Telegram in Ukraine and in other countries. Thank you for reading.

Overview of Cited Sources

Here are the sources of the article, which are valid, reliable, relevant and if possible official links that allow to justify and verify the statements made in this article:

  • [Liga.net]: the news site that published the interview of Oleksiy Danilov on November 2, 2023, in which he expresses his concerns about Telegram.
  • [NV.ua]: the news site that reported the statement of Oleksiy Danilov, who alerted the nation to the critical vulnerabilities of Telegram, on November 2, 2023.
  • [RT – Pravda]: the Ukrainian news site that related the remarks of Oleksiy Danilov, who answered the questions of journalists during a press conference on November 3, 2023.
  • [Number of Telegram Users in 2023? 55 Telegram Stats (backlinko.com)]: an article that gives figures on the use of Telegram in the world and in Ukraine.
  • [NV.ua -NSDC]: the official website of the National Security and Defense Council of Ukraine, which published the press release of Oleksiy Danilov, who clarified his recent comments on Telegram, on November 15, 2023
  • [Ukrainians turn to encrypted messengers, offline maps and Twitter amid Russian invasion]: an article that describes how Ukrainians use Telegram and other digital tools to protect themselves and get informed in the face of the Russian aggression.
  • [Pravda – France 24]: the French news site that contains a video of the interview of Oleksiy Danilov with the journalist Gulliver Cragg, dated January 23, 2023.
  • [NFC HSM Technology – Freemindtronic]: an article that explains the NFC HSM technologies and how they work.
  • [EviCypher NFC HSM technology – Freemindtronic]: a page that contains articles and videos on the NFC HSM technologies.
  • [FAQ for the Technically Inclined – Telegram APIs]: a page that provides technical information about the Telegram APIs and the MTProto protocol.

Ledger Security Breaches from 2017 to 2023: How to Protect Yourself from Hackers

Ledger Security Breaches from 2017 to 2023: How to Protect Yourself from Hackers
Ledger security breaches written by Jacques Gascuel, inventor specializing in safety and security of sensitive data, for Freemindtronic. This article will be updated with any new information on the topic.

Ledger security incidents: How Hackers Exploited Them and How to Stay Safe

Ledger security breaches have exposed the personal data and private keys of many users. Ledger is a French company that provides secure devices to store and manage your funds. But since 2017, hackers have targeted Ledger’s e-commerce and marketing database, as well as its software and hardware products. In this article, you will discover the different breaches, how hackers exploited them, what their consequences were, and how you can protect yourself from these threats.

2025 Cyberculture Cybersecurity Digital Security EviLink

CryptPeer messagerie P2P WebRTC : appels directs chiffrés de bout en bout

2026 Awards Cyberculture Digital Security Distinction Excellence EviOTP NFC HSM Technology EviPass EviPass NFC HSM technology EviPass Technology finalists PassCypher PassCypher

Quantum-Resistant Passwordless Manager — PassCypher finalist, Intersec Awards 2026 (FIDO-free, RAM-only)

2025 Digital Security

Persistent OAuth Flaw: How Tycoon 2FA Hijacks Cloud Access

2025 Digital Security

Android Spyware Threat Clayrat : 2025 Analysis and Exposure

2025 Digital Security

Spyware ClayRat Android : faux WhatsApp espion mobile

2025 Digital Security Technical News

Sovereign SSH Authentication with PassCypher HSM PGP — Zero Key in Clear

2025 Digital Security Tech Fixes Security Solutions Technical News

SSH Key PassCypher HSM PGP — Sécuriser l’accès multi-OS à un VPS

Ledger Security Breaches from 2017 to 2023: How to Protect Your Cryptocurrencies from Hackers

Have you ever wondered how safe your cryptocurrencies are? If you are using a Ledger device, you might think that you are protected from hackers and thieves. Ledger is a French company that specializes in cryptocurrency security. It offers devices that allow you to store and manage your funds securely. These devices are called hardware wallets, and they are designed to protect your private keys from hackers and thieves.

However, since 2017, Ledger has been victim of several security breaches, which have exposed the personal data and private keys of its users. These breaches could allow hackers to steal your cryptocurrencies or harm you in other ways. In this article, we will show you the different breaches that were discovered, how they were exploited, what their consequences were, and how you can protect yourself from these threats.

Ledger Security Issues: The Seed Phrase Recovery Attack (February 2018)

The seed phrase is a series of words that allows you to restore access to a cryptocurrency wallet. It must be kept secret and secure, as it gives full control over the funds. In February 2018, a security researcher named Saleem Rashid discovered a breach in the Ledger Nano S, which allowed an attacker with physical access to the device to recover the seed phrase using a side-channel attack.

How did hackers exploit the breach?

The attack consisted of using an oscilloscope to measure the voltage variations on the reset pin of the device. These variations reflected the operations performed by the secure processor of the Ledger Nano S, which generated the seed phrase. By analyzing these variations, the attacker could reconstruct the seed phrase and access the user’s funds.

Simplified diagram of the attack

Figure Ledger Security Issues: The Seed Phrase Recovery Attack (February 2018)
Statistics on the breach
  • Number of potentially affected users: about 1 million
  • Total amount of potentially stolen funds: unknown
  • Date of discovery of the breach by Ledger: February 20, 2018
  • Author of the discovery of the breach: Saleem Rashid, a security researcher
  • Date of publication of the fix by Ledger: April 3, 2018

Scenarios of hacker attacks

  • Scenario of physical access: The attacker needs to have physical access to the device, either by stealing it, buying it second-hand, or intercepting it during delivery. The attacker then needs to connect the device to an oscilloscope and measure the voltage variations on the reset pin. The attacker can then use a software tool to reconstruct the seed phrase from the measurements.
  • Scenario of remote access: The attacker needs to trick the user into installing a malicious software on their computer, which can communicate with the device and trigger the reset pin. The attacker then needs to capture the voltage variations remotely, either by using a wireless device or by compromising the oscilloscope. The attacker can then use a software tool to reconstruct the seed phrase from the measurements.

Sources

1Breaking the Ledger Security Model – Saleem Rashid published on March 20, 2018.

2Ledger Nano S: A Secure Hardware Wallet for Cryptocurrencies? – Saleem Rashid published on November 20, 2018.

Ledger Security Flaws: The Firmware Replacement Attack (March 2018)

The firmware is the software that controls the operation of the device. It must be digitally signed by Ledger to ensure its integrity. In March 2018, the same researcher discovered another breach in the Ledger Nano S, which allowed an attacker to replace the firmware of the device with a malicious firmware, capable of stealing the private keys or falsifying the transactions.

How did hackers exploit the Ledger Security Breaches?

The attack consisted of exploiting a vulnerability in the mechanism of verification of the firmware signature. The attacker could create a malicious firmware that passed the signature check, and that installed on the device. This malicious firmware could then send the user’s private keys to the attacker, or modify the transactions displayed on the device screen.

Simplified diagram of the attack

Figure Ledger Security Flaws: The Firmware Replacement Attack (March 2018)

Statistics on the breach

  • Number of potentially affected users: about 1 million
  • Total amount of potentially stolen funds: unknown
  • Date of discovery of the breach by Ledger: March 20, 2018
  • Author of the discovery of the breach: Saleem Rashid, a security researcher
  • Date of publication of the fix by Ledger: April 3, 2018

Scenarios of hacker attacks

  • Scenario of physical access: The attacker needs to have physical access to the device, either by stealing it, buying it second-hand, or intercepting it during delivery. The attacker then needs to connect the device to a computer and install the malicious firmware on it. The attacker can then use the device to access the user’s funds or falsify their transactions.
  • Scenario of remote access: The attacker needs to trick the user into installing the malicious firmware on their device, either by sending a fake notification, a phishing email, or a malicious link. The attacker then needs to communicate with the device and send the user’s private keys or modify their transactions.

Sources

: [Breaking the Ledger Security Model – Saleem Rashid] published on March 20, 2018.

: [Ledger Nano S Firmware 1.4.1: What’s New? – Ledger Blog] published on March 6, 2018.

Ledger Security Incidents: The Printed Circuit Board Modification Attack (November 2018)

The printed circuit board is the hardware part of the device, which contains the electronic components. It must be protected against malicious modifications, which could compromise the security of the device. In November 2018, a security researcher named Dmitry Nedospasov discovered a breach in the Ledger Nano S, which allowed an attacker with physical access to the device to modify the printed circuit board and install a listening device, capable of capturing the private keys or modifying the transactions.

How did hackers exploit the breach?

The attack consisted of removing the case of the device, and soldering a microcontroller on the printed circuit board. This microcontroller could intercept the communications between the secure processor and the non-secure processor of the Ledger Nano S, and transmit them to the attacker via a wireless connection. The attacker could then access the user’s private keys, or modify the transactions displayed on the device screen.

Simplified diagram of the attack

figure Ledger Security Incidents: The Printed Circuit Board Modification Attack (November 2018)

Statistics on the breach

  • Number of potentially affected users: unknown
  • Total amount of potentially stolen funds: unknown
  • Date of discovery of the breach by Ledger: November 7, 2019
  • Author of the discovery of the breach: Dmitry Nedospasov, a security researcher
  • Date of publication of the fix by Ledger: December 17, 2020

Scenarios of hacker attacks

  • Scenario of physical access: The attacker needs to have physical access to the device, either by stealing it, buying it second-hand, or intercepting it during delivery. The attacker then needs to remove the case of the device and solder the microcontroller on the printed circuit board. The attacker can then use the wireless connection to access the user’s funds or modify their transactions.
  • Scenario of remote access: The attacker needs to compromise the wireless connection between the device and the microcontroller, either by using a jammer, a repeater, or a hacker device. The attacker can then intercept the communications between the secure processor and the non-secure processor, and access the user’s funds or modify their transactions.

Sources

  • [Breaking the Ledger Nano X – Dmitry Nedospasov] published on November 7, 2019.
  • [How to Verify the Authenticity of Your Ledger Device – Ledger Blog] published on December 17, 2020.

Ledger Security Breaches: The Connect Kit Attack (December 2023)

The Connect Kit is a software that allows users to manage their cryptocurrencies from their computer or smartphone, by connecting to their Ledger device. It allows to check the balance, send and receive cryptocurrencies, and access services such as staking or swap.

The Connect Kit breach was discovered by the security teams of Ledger in December 2023. It was due to a vulnerability in a third-party component used by the Connect Kit. This component, called Electron, is a framework that allows to create desktop applications with web technologies. The version used by the Connect Kit was not up to date, and had a breach that allowed hackers to execute arbitrary code on the update server of the Connect Kit.

How did hackers exploit the Ledger Security Breaches?

The hackers took advantage of this breach to inject malicious code into the update server of the Connect Kit. This malicious code was intended to be downloaded and executed by the users who updated their Connect Kit software. The malicious code aimed to steal the sensitive information of the users, such as their private keys, passwords, email addresses, or phone numbers.

Simplified diagram of the attack

Figure Ledger Security Breaches The Connect Kit Attack (December 2023)

Statistics on the breach

  • Number of potentially affected users: about 10,000
  • Total amount of potentially stolen funds: unknown
  • Date of discovery of the breach by Ledger: December 14, 2023
  • Author of the discovery of the breach: Pierre Noizat, director of security at Ledger
  • Date of publication of the fix by Ledger: December 15, 2023

Scenarios of hacker attacks

  • Scenario of remote access: The hacker needs to trick the user into updating their Connect Kit software, either by sending a fake notification, a phishing email, or a malicious link. The hacker then needs to download and execute the malicious code on the user’s device, either by exploiting a vulnerability or by asking the user’s permission. The hacker can then access the user’s information or funds.
  • Scenario of keyboard: The hacker needs to install a keylogger on the user’s device, either by using the malicious code or by another means. The keylogger can record the keystrokes of the user, and send them to the hacker. The hacker can then use the user’s passwords, PIN codes, or seed phrases to access their funds.
  • Scenario of screen: The hacker needs to install a screen recorder on the user’s device, either by using the malicious code or by another means. The screen recorder can capture the screen of the user, and send it to the hacker. The hacker can then use the user’s QR codes, addresses, or transaction confirmations to steal or modify their funds.

Sources

Ledger Security Breaches: The Data Leak (December 2020)

The database is the system that stores the information of Ledger customers, such as their names, addresses, phone numbers and email addresses. It must be protected against unauthorized access, which could compromise the privacy of customers. In December 2020, Ledger revealed that a breach in its database had exposed the personal data of 292,000 customers, including 9,500 in France.

How did hackers exploit the breach?

The breach had been exploited by a hacker in June 2020, who had managed to access the database via a poorly configured API key. The hacker had then published the stolen data on an online forum, making them accessible to everyone. Ledger customers were then victims of phishing attempts, harassment, or threats from other hackers, who sought to obtain their private keys or funds.

Simplified diagram of the attack :

Statistics on the breach

  • Number of affected users: 292,000, including 9,500 in France
  • Total amount of potentially stolen funds: unknown
  • Date of discovery of the breach by Ledger: June 25, 2020
  • Author of the discovery of the breach: Ledger, after being notified by a researcher
  • Date of publication of the fix by Ledger: July 14, 2020

Scenarios of hacker attacks

  • Scenario of phishing: The hacker sends an email or a text message to the user, pretending to be Ledger or another trusted entity. The hacker asks the user to click on a link, enter their credentials, or update their device. The hacker then steals the user’s information or funds.
  • Scenario of harassment: The hacker calls or visits the user, using their personal data to intimidate them. The hacker threatens the user to reveal their identity, harm them, or steal their funds, unless they pay a ransom or give their private keys.
  • Scenario of threats: The hacker uses the user’s personal data to find their social media accounts, family members, or friends. The hacker then sends messages or posts to the user or their contacts, threatening to harm them or expose their cryptocurrency activities, unless they comply with their demands.

Sources:
– [Ledger Data Breach: A Cybersecurity Update – Ledger Blog] published on January 29, 2021.

Comparison with other crypto wallets

Ledger is not the only solution to secure your cryptocurrencies. There are other options, such as other hardware wallets, software wallets, or exchanges. Each option has its advantages and disadvantages, depending on your needs and preferences. For example, other hardware wallets, such as Trezor or Keepser, offer similar features and security levels as Ledger, but they may have different designs, interfaces, or prices. Software wallets, such as Exodus or Electrum, are more convenient and accessible, but they are less secure and more vulnerable to malware or hacking. Exchanges, such as Coinbase or Binance, are more user-friendly and offer more services, such as trading or staking, but they are more centralized and risky, as they can be hacked, shut down, or regulated. Another option is to use a cold wallet, such as SeedNFC HSM, which is a patented HSM that uses NFC technology to store and manage your cryptocurrencies offline, without any connection to the internet or a computer. It also allows you to create up to 100 cryptocurrency wallets and check the balances from this NFC HSM.

Technological, Regulatory, and Societal Projections

The future of cryptocurrency security is uncertain and challenging. Many factors can affect Ledger and its users, such as technological, regulatory, or societal changes.

Technological changes

It changes could bring new threats, such as quantum computing, which could break the encryption of Ledger devices, or new solutions, such as biometric authentication or segmented key authentication patented by Freemindtronic, which could improve the security of Ledger devices.

Regulatory changes

New rules or restrictions could affect Cold Wallet and Hardware Wallet manufacturers and users, such as Ledger. For example, KYC (Know Your Customer) or AML (Anti-Money Laundering) requirements could compromise the privacy and anonymity of Ledger users. They could also ban or limit the use of cryptocurrencies, which could reduce the demand and value of Ledger devices. On the other hand, other manufacturers who have anticipated these new legal constraints could have an advantage over Ledger. Here are some examples of regulatory changes that could affect Ledger and other crypto wallets:

  • MiCA, the proposed EU regulation on crypto-asset markets, aims to create a harmonized framework for crypto-assets and crypto-asset service providers in the EU. It also seeks to address the risks and challenges posed by crypto-assets, such as consumer protection, market integrity, financial stability and money laundering.
  • U.S. interagency report on stablecoins recommends that Congress consider new legislation to ensure that stablecoins and stablecoin arrangements are subject to a federal prudential framework. It also proposes additional features, such as limiting issuers to insured depository institutions, subjecting entities conducting stablecoin activities (e.g., digital wallets) to federal oversight, and limiting affiliations between issuers and commercial entities.
  • Revised guidance from the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) on virtual assets and virtual asset service providers (VASPs) clarifies the application of FATF standards to virtual assets and VASPs. It also introduces new obligations and recommendations for PSAVs, such as the implementation of the travel rule, licensing and registration of PSAVs, and supervision and enforcement of PSAVs.

These regulatory changes could have significant implications for Ledger and other crypto wallets. They could require them to comply with new rules and standards, to obtain new licenses or registrations, to implement new systems and processes, and to face new supervisory and enforcement actions.

Societal changes

Societal changes could influence the perception and adoption of Ledger and cryptocurrencies, such as increased awareness and education, which could increase the trust and popularity of Ledger devices, or increased competition and innovation, which could challenge the position and performance of Ledger devices. For example, the EviSeed NFC HSM technology allows the creation of up to 100 cryptocurrency wallets on 5 different blockchains chosen freely by the user.

Technological alternatives

Technological alternatives are already available, such as EviCore NFC HSM, EviCore HSM OpenPGP, EviCore NFC HSM Browser Extension and the NFC HSM devices that work without contact, developed and manufactured by Freemindtronic in Andorra. These are new cyber security and safety technologies that use HSMs with or without NFC. They offer a wide range of security features to manage your cryptocurrencies and other digital assets. These technologies also offer the hardware management of complex and complicated passwords by EviPass NFC HSM, OTP (2FA) keys by EviOTP NFC HSM, Seed Phrases by EviSeed NFC HSM, and the creation of multiple cryptocurrency wallets on the same device.

Conclusion

Ledger, the French leader in cryptocurrency security, has faced several security breaches since 2017. As a result of these breaches, hackers could steal the private keys and funds of Ledger users. In response to these threats, Ledger reacted by publishing security updates, informing its users, and strengthening its protection measures. However, Ledger users must be vigilant and follow the recommendations of Ledger to protect themselves from these attacks. Despite these challenges, Ledger remains a reliable and secure device to manage cryptocurrencies, as long as the best practices of digital hygiene are respected. If you want to learn more about Ledger and its products, you can visit their official website or read their blog. Additionally, you can also check their security reports and their help center for more information.

TETRA Security Vulnerabilities: How to Protect Critical Infrastructures

TETRA Security Vulnerabilities secured by EviPass or EviCypher NFC HSM Technologies from Freemindtronic-Andorra
TETRA Security Vulnerabilities by Jacques Gascuel: This article will be updated with any new information on the topic.

TETRA Security Vulnerabilities

Tetra is a radio communication standard used by critical sectors worldwide. But it has five security flaws that could expose its encryption and authentication. How can you protect your Tetra system from hackers? Read this article TETRA Security Vulnerabilities to find out the best practices and tips.

2025 Cyberculture Cybersecurity Digital Security EviLink

CryptPeer messagerie P2P WebRTC : appels directs chiffrés de bout en bout

2026 Awards Cyberculture Digital Security Distinction Excellence EviOTP NFC HSM Technology EviPass EviPass NFC HSM technology EviPass Technology finalists PassCypher PassCypher

Quantum-Resistant Passwordless Manager — PassCypher finalist, Intersec Awards 2026 (FIDO-free, RAM-only)

2025 Digital Security

Persistent OAuth Flaw: How Tycoon 2FA Hijacks Cloud Access

2025 Digital Security

Android Spyware Threat Clayrat : 2025 Analysis and Exposure

2025 Digital Security

Spyware ClayRat Android : faux WhatsApp espion mobile

2025 Digital Security Technical News

Sovereign SSH Authentication with PassCypher HSM PGP — Zero Key in Clear

2025 Digital Security Tech Fixes Security Solutions Technical News

SSH Key PassCypher HSM PGP — Sécuriser l’accès multi-OS à un VPS

TETRA Security Vulnerabilities: How to Protect Critical Infrastructures from Cyberattacks

TETRA (Terrestrial Trunked Radio) is a radio technology that is used worldwide for critical communications and data, especially in the sectors of security, energy, transport and defense. But this technology, which has been kept secret for more than 25 years, hides serious security vulnerabilities, including a backdoor that could allow devastating cyberattacks.

What is TETRA?

TETRA is a European radio standard that was developed in the 1990s to meet the needs of professional mobile services, such as police, firefighters, emergency services, military, prison staff, etc. TETRA allows to transmit data and voice encrypted on frequencies ranging from 380 to 470 MHz, with a range of several kilometers.

TETRA is used by more than 2000 networks in more than 150 countries, according to the TETRA and Critical Communications Association (TCCA), which brings together the manufacturers, operators and users of this technology. Among the main manufacturers of TETRA radios, we find Motorola Solutions, Hytera, Airbus, Sepura and Rohill.

TETRA offers several advantages over other radio technologies, such as:

  • better sound quality
  • greater transmission capacity
  • greater security thanks to encryption
  • greater flexibility thanks to the possibility of creating communication groups
  • greater interoperability thanks to the compatibility of equipment

Source french: TETRA digital mode & F4HXZ – Blog radioamateur

What are the vulnerabilities of TETRA?

Despite its strengths, TETRA also has weaknesses, which have been revealed by a group of Dutch researchers from Radboud University Nijmegen. These researchers conducted a thorough analysis of the TETRA standard and its encryption algorithms, which were until then kept secret by the manufacturers and authorities.

The researchers discovered two types of major vulnerabilities in TETRA:

  • A backdoor in the encryption algorithm TEA1, which is used in radios sold for sensitive equipment, such as pipelines, railways, power grid, public transport or freight trains. This backdoor allows an attacker to decrypt the communications and data transmitted by these radios, and possibly to modify or block them. The backdoor exists since the creation of the algorithm TEA1, in 1998, and cannot be corrected by a simple software update. The researchers managed to extract the secret key of the backdoor by analyzing the binary code of the radios.
  • A weakness in the encryption algorithm TEA2, which is used in radios intended for professional mobile services, such as police, firefighters, emergency services, military or prison staff. This weakness allows an attacker to reduce the number of possible keys to test to decrypt the communications and data transmitted by these radios. The researchers estimated that it would take about 10 minutes to find the right key with a standard computer. This weakness was corrected by the manufacturers in 2016, but the radios that have not been updated remain vulnerable.

To find the backdoor in the TEA1 algorithm, the researchers used a technique called “differential analysis”, which consists of comparing the outputs of the algorithm for slightly different inputs. By observing the differences, they were able to identify a part of the code that was not normally used, but that was activated by a special condition. This condition was the presence of a secret key of 64 bits, which was hidden in the binary code of the radios. By analyzing the code, they were able to extract the secret key and test it on encrypted communications with the TEA1 algorithm. They were thus able to confirm that the secret key allowed to decrypt the communications without knowing the normal key of 80 bits. The researchers published their official report and the source code of the TETRA encryption algorithms on their website.

Source: https://cs.ru.nl/~cmeijer/publications/All_cops_are_broadcasting_TETRA_under_scrutiny.pdf

What are the risks for critical infrastructures?

The vulnerabilities identified in TETRA represent a danger for the critical infrastructures that use this technology, because they could be exploited by cybercriminals, terrorists or spies to disrupt or damage these infrastructures.

For example, an attacker could:

  • listen to the communications and confidential data of the security or defense services
  • impersonate an operator or a manager to give false instructions or orders
  • modify or erase data or commands that control vital equipment, such as valves, switches, signals or brakes
  • cause failures, accidents, fires or explosions

These scenarios could have dramatic consequences on the security, health, economy or environment of the countries concerned.

How to protect yourself from cyberattacks on TETRA?

The users of TETRA must be aware of the vulnerabilities of this technology and take measures to protect themselves from potential cyberattacks. Among the recommendations of the researchers, we can mention:

  • check if the radios used are affected by the vulnerabilities and ask the manufacturers for correction solutions
  • avoid using the algorithm TEA1, which contains the backdoor, and prefer safer algorithms, such as TEA3 or TEA4
  • use encryption keys that are long and complex enough, and change them regularly
  • set up verification and authentication procedures for communications and data
  • monitor the radio traffic and detect anomalies or intrusion attempts
  • raise awareness and train staff on cybersecurity and good practices

TETRA digital mode: how to transfer data via TETRA

TETRA (Terrestrial Trunked Radio) is a digital and secure radio communication standard used by emergency services, law enforcement, public transport and industries. TETRA uses a π/4-DQPSK phase modulation and a TDMA time division multiplexing to transmit voice and data on a bandwidth of 25 KHz per transmission channel. Each channel is divided into four timeslots, one of which is reserved for signaling in trunked mode (TMO).

TETRA allows file transfer via radio in two ways: by the packet data service (PDS) or by the circuit data service (CDS).

The PDS uses the IP protocol to transmit data packets on one or more timeslots. It offers a maximum throughput of 28.8 kbit/s per timeslot, or 86.4 kbit/s for three timeslots. The PDS can be used to send small files, such as images, text messages or forms.

The CDS uses the LAPD protocol to transmit data by circuit on a dedicated timeslot. It offers a constant throughput of 4.8 kbit/s per timeslot, or 19.2 kbit/s for four timeslots. The CDS can be used to send large files, such as documents, videos or maps.

The choice of the data service depends on the type of file, the size of the file, the quality of the radio link, the cost and the availability of radio resources. The PDS offers more flexibility and performance, but it requires a good signal quality and it can be more expensive in terms of battery consumption and spectrum occupation. The CDS offers more reliability and simplicity, but it requires a prior allocation of a timeslot and it can be slower and less efficient.

Securing TETRA file transfers with Freemindtronic’s EviCypher technology

However, both data services are subject to the TETRA security vulnerabilities that we have discussed in the previous sections. These vulnerabilities could allow an attacker to intercept, modify or corrupt the files transferred via TETRA, or to prevent their transmission altogether. Therefore, the users of TETRA must ensure the integrity and the confidentiality of the files they send or receive, by using encryption, verification and authentication methods. Freemindtronic’s EviCypher technology can be a valuable solution for encrypting data with post-quantum AES-256 from an NFC HSM with your own randomly generated keys before transferring them via TETRA. This way, even if an attacker corrupts the data transmitted by TETRA, they will not be able to decrypt the data encrypted by a product embedding

How to secure file transfers via TETRA with Freemindtronic’s EviCypher technology

La technologie EviCypher de Freemindtronic peut être une solution précieuse pour chiffrer les données avec AES-256 post-quantique à partir d’un HSM NFC avec vos propres clés générées aléatoirement avant de les transférer via TETRA. Ainsi, même si un attaquant corrompt les données transmises par TETRA, il ne pourra pas décrypter les données cryptées par un produit embarquant la technologie EviCypher NFC HSM technology, such as DataShielder NFC HSM or DataSielder Defense NFC HSM. These products are portable and autonomous devices that allow you to secure the access to computer systems, applications or online services, using the NFC as a means of authentication and encryption.

The management of encryption keys for TETRA

To use encryption on the TETRA network, you need an encryption key, which is a secret code of 80 bits, or 10 bytes. This key must be shared between the radios that want to communicate securely, and must be protected against theft, loss or compromise.

There are several methods to save and enter encryption keys for TETRA, depending on the type of radio and the level of security required. Here are some examples:

  • The manual method: it consists of entering the encryption key using the keyboard of the radio, by typing the 10 bytes in hexadecimal form. This method is simple, but impractical and unsafe, because it requires to know the key by heart or to write it down on a support, which increases the risk of disclosure or error. For example, a 80-bit key could be 3A4F9C7B12E8D6F0.
  • The automatic method: it consists of using an external device, such as a computer or a smart card, which generates and transfers the encryption key to the radio by a cable or a wireless link. This method is faster and more reliable, but it requires to have a compatible and secure device, and to connect it to the radio at each key change.
  • The EviPass method: it consists of using the EviPass NFC HSM technology which allows to generate, store and manage keys and secrets in a secure and independent NFC HSM device. This method is the most innovative and secure, because it allows to create keys higher than 80 bits randomly in hexadecimal base 16, 58, 64 or 85, to store them in a physical device protected by an access code and a robust AES-256 post-quantum encryption algorithm, and to transfer them by various contactless means, via a computer. This method does not require to know or write down the key, which reduces the risk of disclosure or error. For example, a 10-byte key of 80 bits could be 3F 8A 6B 4C 9D 1E 7F 2A 5B 0C.

The EviPass NFC HSM technology of Freemindtronic allows to create secure gateways between the NFC devices and the computer systems, using advanced encryption protocols, such as AES, RSA or ECC. The EviPass NFC HSM technology is embedded in the PassCyber NFC HSM product, which is a portable and autonomous device that allows to secure the access to computer systems, applications or online or offligne services, using the NFC as a means of authentication.

Conclusion

TETRA is a radio technology that was designed to offer secure and reliable communication to professional mobile services and critical infrastructures. But this technology, which has been kept secret for decades, presents vulnerabilities that could be exploited by cyberattackers to compromise these communications and infrastructures. The users of TETRA must be vigilant and take measures to protect themselves from these threats, by updating their equipment, choosing robust encryption algorithms, using strong keys, verifying and authenticating data and monitoring radio traffic. The EviPass NFC HSM technology of Freemindtronic can be an effective solution to strengthen the security of keys and secrets used for verification and authentication, by storing them in a secure and independent NFC device. The researchers who revealed the vulnerabilities of TETRA hope that their work will contribute to improve the security of communications in critical domains.

FormBook Malware: How to Protect Your Gmail and Other Data

FormBook Malware: how to protect your gmail and other data
Protect your Gmail Account FormBook malware – Jacques Gascuel: This article will be updated with any new information on the topic.

Secure Your Gmail from FormBook Attacks

FormBook is a malware that can steal your Gmail credentials, messages, and attachments. Learn how to use the Freemindtronic devices to encrypt your Gmail data and use passwordless and 2FA.

2025 Cyberculture Cybersecurity Digital Security EviLink

CryptPeer messagerie P2P WebRTC : appels directs chiffrés de bout en bout

2026 Awards Cyberculture Digital Security Distinction Excellence EviOTP NFC HSM Technology EviPass EviPass NFC HSM technology EviPass Technology finalists PassCypher PassCypher

Quantum-Resistant Passwordless Manager — PassCypher finalist, Intersec Awards 2026 (FIDO-free, RAM-only)

2025 Digital Security

Persistent OAuth Flaw: How Tycoon 2FA Hijacks Cloud Access

2025 Digital Security

Android Spyware Threat Clayrat : 2025 Analysis and Exposure

2025 Digital Security

Spyware ClayRat Android : faux WhatsApp espion mobile

2025 Digital Security Technical News

Sovereign SSH Authentication with PassCypher HSM PGP — Zero Key in Clear

2025 Digital Security Tech Fixes Security Solutions Technical News

SSH Key PassCypher HSM PGP — Sécuriser l’accès multi-OS à un VPS

How to Protect Your Gmail Account from FormBook Malware

Introduction

Imagine that you receive an email from your bank, asking you to confirm your identity by clicking on a link. You open the link, and you find yourself on a page that looks like your bank’s website, but it is actually a fake. You enter your credentials, and you think you are done. But in reality, you have just given access to your bank account to hackers, who will use it to steal your money, or worse. This is what FormBook can do, a malware that can steal your sensitive data, and that Google cannot stop. In this article, we will explain what FormBook is, how it works, and how to protect yourself from this malware.

What is FormBook and why is it a threat?

FormBook is a malware that can record your keystrokes, take screenshots, and steal your passwords, cookies, and clipboard data. It can also download and execute other malicious files on your device.

FormBook is distributed through phishing emails that contain malicious attachments. These attachments are usually disguised as invoices, receipts, or shipping confirmations. When you open them, they ask you to enable macros or content. If you do, the malware will be installed on your device.

FormBook can target any web browser, but it has a special feature for Chrome. It can inject a fake Gmail login page into your browser, and trick you into entering your credentials. The malware will then send your Gmail username and password to a remote server controlled by the hackers.

FormBook is a threat because it can compromise your Gmail account and access your personal and professional information. It can also use your Gmail account to send spam or phishing emails to your contacts, or to access other online services that are linked to your Gmail account, such as Google Drive, Google Photos, or Google Pay.

How to protect yourself from FormBook?

Google has not yet found a way to detect and block FormBook. Therefore, you need to be extra careful when you use Gmail and other online services. Here are some tips to protect yourself from FormBook and other malware:

  • Do not open or download attachments from unknown or suspicious senders. If you are not sure about the legitimacy of an email, contact the sender directly or check the official website of the company or organization.
  • Do not enable macros or content in any document unless you trust the source. Macros are small programs that can run malicious code on your device.
  • Use a strong and unique password for your Gmail account and other online accounts. Do not reuse the same password for different services. Change your password regularly and use a password manager to store and generate your passwords.
  • Enable two-factor authentication (2FA) for your Gmail account and other online accounts. 2FA adds an extra layer of security by requiring a code or a device confirmation in addition to your password.
  • Use a reputable antivirus software and keep it updated. Antivirus software can scan your device for malware and remove it. You can also use a browser extension that can block malicious websites and pop-ups.

How to encrypt your Gmail messages and attachments with DataShielder NFC HSM

DataShielder NFC HSM is a device that allows you to encrypt and decrypt your Gmail messages and attachments with your own encryption keys that you create and store offline. It uses the EviCypher NFC HSM technology, which is a contactless hardware security module (NFC HSM) that won the Gold Medal for International Inventions in Geneva on March 2021.

With DataShielder NFC HSM, you can encrypt and decrypt your data with AES-256 keys that are randomly generated and stored in the NFC HSM. You can store up to 100 keys and one pair of RSA-4096 keys in the NFC HSM. You can also use different keys for the message and the attachment.

To encrypt your Gmail message and attachment, you need to use the EviCrypt and EviFile applications that are embedded in the DataShielder NFC HSM. These applications allow you to encrypt and decrypt your data with a simple tap of your NFC phone on the DataShielder NFC HSM. You can also share your encrypted data with other users who have the same device and the same key.

By using DataShielder NFC HSM, you can protect your Gmail messages and attachments from FormBook or any other malware that can access your Gmail account. Even if your Gmail account is hacked, your encrypted data will remain encrypted and unreadable by the hackers. Only you and the authorized recipients can decrypt your data with the DataShielder NFC HSM.

How to protect your web Gmail account with passwordless and 2FA using PassCypher NFC HSM

Do you want to manage your web accounts with complicated and complex passwords that you do not need to know, remember, or type? If yes, then you should try PassCypher NFC HSM. This device uses the EviPass NFC HSM technology, which is a contactless hardware password manager that won the Silver Medal for International Inventions in Geneva on March 2021.

With PassCypher NFC HSM, you can create and store your usernames and passwords of more than 256-bit in the NFC HSM. Moreover, you can store your OTP TOTP or HOTP secret keys in the NFC HSM to generate the 2FA code for your web accounts. The NFC HSM can store up to 100 web accounts and one pair of RSA-4096 keys.

To use PassCypher NFC HSM, you need to install the Freemindtronic extension for your web browser based on Chromium or Firefox. This extension uses the EviCore NFC HSM Browser technology, which allows you to communicate with the NFC HSM via your NFC phone. You also need to use the EviPass and EviOTP applications that are embedded in the PassCypher NFC HSM. These applications allow you to create, edit, and delete your web accounts and OTP secret keys with a simple tap of your NFC phone on the PassCypher NFC HSM.

By using PassCypher NFC HSM, you can secure your web accounts with passwordless and 2FA. You do not need to display, know, or type your username and password. You just need to tap your NFC phone on the PassCypher NFC HSM and the extension will autofill and auto login your web account. You also do not need to check for a typosquatting attack, since the extension will verify the URL of the website before logging in. And you do not need to use another device or application to generate the 2FA code, since the PassCypher NFC HSM will do it for you.

How to protect your Gmail account from FormBook with PassCypher NFC HSM

FormBook is a dangerous malware that can access your Gmail account and other sensitive data. Google has not yet found a solution to stop it. Therefore, you need to be vigilant and follow the best practices to protect yourself from cyberattacks. One of them is to use PassCypher NFC HSM to secure your Gmail account with passwordless and 2FA.

By using PassCypher NFC HSM, you can protect your Gmail account from FormBook or any other malware that can access your web browser. Even if your web browser is hacked, your usernames and passwords will remain encrypted and inaccessible by the hackers. Only you can decrypt your Gmail account with the PassCypher NFC HSM. And even if the hackers manage to steal your session cookies, they will not be able to log in to your Gmail account without the 2FA code that is generated by the PassCypher NFC HSM.

To use PassCypher NFC HSM with your Gmail account, you need to follow these steps:

  • Create a Gmail account in the EviPass application on the PassCypher NFC HSM. You can use the default username and password, or you can generate a random and complex password with the EviPass application.
  • Enable 2FA for your Gmail account on the Google website.
  • Choose the option to use an authenticator app, and scan the QR code with the EviOTP application on the PassCypher NFC HSM. This will store your OTP secret key in the NFC HSM.
  • Log in to your Gmail account with the Freemindtronic extension on your web browser. Tap your NFC phone on the PassCypher NFC HSM and the extension will autofill and auto login your Gmail account. You will also see a pop-up window with the 2FA code that you need to enter on the Google website.

By following these steps, you can use PassCypher NFC HSM to secure your Gmail account with passwordless and 2FA. You can also use PassCypher NFC HSM with other web accounts that support 2FA, such as Facebook, Twitter, or Amazon. This way, you can protect yourself from FormBook and other malware that can access your web browser.

Recent statistics on FormBook

FormBook is a malware that was first discovered in 2016, but it remains very active and dangerous. According to the Check Point report on cybersecurity in 2022, FormBook was the third most widespread malware in 2021, attacking 5% of enterprise networks. It was also the most prolific infostealer malware, accounting for 16% of attacks worldwide.

FormBook spreads mainly through phishing emails that contain malicious attachments. These attachments are often RAR self-extracting archives, which are compressed files that can run malicious code when opened. The RAR files contain a legitimate document, such as a PDF or a Word file, and a hidden executable file, which is the FormBook malware. When the user opens the RAR file, the document is displayed, but the malware is also installed in the background.

FormBook can also spread through other methods, such as drive-by downloads, malicious links, or removable media. The malware can infect any Windows device, from Windows XP to Windows 10. The malware can also evade detection and removal by using various techniques, such as encryption, obfuscation, or anti-analysis.

Here are some recent statistics on FormBook, based on the data from Check Point and ANY.RUN:

  • FormBook was the most popular malware in August 2021, affecting 4.5% of organizations worldwide, followed by Trickbot and Agent Tesla, affecting respectively 4% and 3% of organizations worldwide.
  • FormBook was the fourth most common malware in 2020, according to the ranking of malware families by ANY.RUN. It accounted for 8% of the samples analyzed by the online sandboxing service.
  • FormBook was used in many phishing campaigns targeting various industries, such as defense, aerospace, health, education, finance, retail, etc. It was also used to attack Ukrainian targets during the war between Russia and Ukraine in 2022.
  • FormBook has a successor called XLoader, which appeared in 2020 and which is able to infect macOS users. XLoader is sold on the dark web for $59 for a Windows license and $49 for a macOS license.

Danger level of FormBook compared to other malware

FormBook is a very dangerous malware, because it can steal sensitive information, such as credentials, passwords, credit card numbers, 2FA codes, etc. It can also download and execute other malware, such as ransomware, banking trojans, spyware, etc. It can also remotely control the infected device and perform various malicious actions, such as deleting browser cookies, taking screenshots, restarting or shutting down the system, etc.

FormBook is also hard to detect and remove, because it uses advanced evasion techniques, such as code injection, string obfuscation, data encryption, anti-analysis, etc. It also changes frequently its name, path, and file extension, and uses random Windows registry keys to maintain its persistence.

To compare the danger level of FormBook with other known malware in its category, we can use the following criteria:

  • The number of organizations affected worldwide
  • The type and amount of information stolen
  • The ability to download and execute other malware
  • The ability to remotely control the infected device
  • The evasion techniques used
  • The ease of detection and removal

Here is a table that compares FormBook with other popular infostealer malware, such as Trickbot, Agent Tesla, LokiBot, and Raccoon:

Malware Number of organizations affected Type and amount of information stolen Ability to download and execute other malware Ability to remotely control the infected device Evasion techniques used Ease of detection and removal
FormBook 4.5% in August 2021 Credentials, passwords, credit card numbers, 2FA codes, screenshots, keystrokes, etc. Yes Yes Code injection, string obfuscation, data encryption, anti-analysis, etc. Hard
Trickbot 4% in August 2021 Credentials, passwords, banking information, personal data, etc. Yes Yes Code injection, string obfuscation, data encryption, anti-analysis, etc. Hard
Agent Tesla 3% in August 2021 Credentials, passwords, banking information, personal data, screenshots, keystrokes, etc. No Yes String obfuscation, data encryption, anti-analysis, etc. Medium
LokiBot 1.5% in August 2021 Credentials, passwords, banking information, personal data, etc. No Yes String obfuscation, data encryption, anti-analysis, etc. Medium
Raccoon 0.8% in August 2021 Credentials, passwords, banking information, personal data, etc. No Yes String obfuscation, data encryption, anti-analysis, etc. Medium

From this table, we can see that FormBook is the most dangerous infostealer malware, because it affects the most organizations, steals the most types of information, and can download and execute other malware. It is also the hardest to detect and remove, because it uses more evasion techniques than the other malware.

Forms of attacks of FormBook

FormBook can be delivered through different forms of attacks, depending on the delivery mechanism chosen by the malicious actor. Here are some forms of attacks of FormBook:

  • Phishing: FormBook can be sent by email as a malicious attachment, such as a Word, Excel, PDF, or ZIP or RAR file. The email can have a misleading subject, such as an invoice, a receipt, a contract, a job offer, etc. When the user opens the attachment, the malware runs and infects the device.
  • Exploitation of vulnerabilities: FormBook can exploit vulnerabilities in popular software, such as Microsoft Office, Windows, Adobe Reader, etc. For example, FormBook used the vulnerability CVE-2017-8570 in Microsoft Office to run malicious code from a RTF file. FormBook also used the vulnerability CVE-2021-40444 in Microsoft MSHTML to run malicious code from a CAB file.
  • Drive-by downloads: FormBook can be downloaded without the user’s knowledge when they visit a compromised or malicious website. The website can use a script or an exploit kit to trigger the download and execution of the malware on the user’s device.
  • Removable media: FormBook can be copied to removable media, such as USB drives, external hard drives, memory cards, etc. When the user connects the removable media to their device, the malware runs automatically and infects the device.
  • Social media: FormBook can be spread by messages or posts on social media, such as Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, etc. These messages or posts can contain links or images that redirect to malicious websites or infected files. When the user clicks on the link or image, the malware is downloaded and executed on their device.

Here is a type of formbook malware attacks image:

Type of Formbook MalwareAttacks

How PassCypher NFC HSM and DataShielder NFC HSM can protect you from FormBook attacks

PassCypher NFC HSM and DataShielder NFC HSM are two devices that use the EviPass NFC HSM technology from Freemindtronic, which is a contactless hardware password manager that won the Silver Medal for International Inventions in Geneva on March 2021. These devices can help you protect your web accounts and your Gmail messages and attachments from FormBook attacks, by using passwordless, 2FA, and encryption.

PassCypher NFC HSM can create and store your usernames and passwords of more than 256-bit in the NFC HSM. It can also store your OTP TOTP or HOTP secret keys in the NFC HSM to generate the 2FA code for your web accounts. The NFC HSM can store up to 100 web accounts and one pair of RSA-4096 keys.

DataShielder NFC HSM can encrypt and decrypt your Gmail messages and attachments with your own encryption keys that you create and store offline. It uses the EviCypher NFC HSM technology, which is a contactless hardware security module (NFC HSM) that won the Gold Medal for International Inventions in Geneva on March 2021. It can store up to 100 keys and one pair of RSA-4096 keys in the NFC HSM.

To use PassCypher NFC HSM and DataShielder NFC HSM, you need to install the Freemindtronic extension for your web browser based on Chromium or Firefox. This extension uses the EviCore NFC HSM Browser technology, which allows you to communicate with the NFC HSM via your NFC phone. You also need to use the EviPass, EviOTP, EviCrypt, and EviFile applications that are embedded in the PassCypher NFC HSM and DataShielder NFC HSM. These applications allow you to create, edit, delete, encrypt, and decrypt your web accounts, OTP secret keys, messages, and attachments with a simple tap of your NFC phone on the PassCypher NFC HSM or DataShielder NFC HSM.

By using PassCypher NFC HSM and DataShielder NFC HSM, you can secure your web accounts and your Gmail messages and attachments with passwordless, 2FA, and encryption. You do not need to display, know, or type your username, password, or encryption key. You just need to tap your NFC phone on the PassCypher NFC HSM or DataShielder NFC HSM and the extension will autofill, auto login, encrypt, or decrypt your web account, message, or attachment. You also do not need to use another device or application to generate the 2FA code, since the PassCypher NFC HSM will do it for you.

Here is a table that shows how PassCypher NFC HSM and DataShielder NFC HSM can protect you from different FormBook attack vectors, such as keylogger, password stealer, file transfer, screenshot, etc. I used a check mark or a cross mark to show visually what PassCypher NFC HSM and DataShielder NFC HSM protect.

 

FormBook PassCypher DataShielder
Keylogger ✔️ ✔️
Password stealer ✔️ ✔️
File transfer ✔️
Screenshot ✔️ ✔️
Remote control
Phishing ✔️ ✔️
Exploit kit
Drive-by download
Removable media ✔️
Social media

This table shows that PassCypher NFC HSM and DataShielder NFC HSM can protect your web accounts from FormBook’s keylogger, password stealer, and phishing, by using passwordless and 2FA. They can also protect your Gmail messages and attachments from FormBook’s file transfer and screenshot, by using encryption and decryption. DataShielder NFC HSM can also protect your data stored in computers or removable media, by using encryption and decryption. However, neither device can protect your device from FormBook’s remote control, exploit kit, drive-by download, or unsecured social media, which can compromise your system and your data. Therefore, you should also use an antivirus software and a firewall to prevent FormBook from accessing your device.