EviEngine: Distributed Cryptographic Trust Architecture

EviEngine is a patented distributed cryptographic authorization architecture implementing hardware-bound deterministic trust validation without centralized infrastructure. It is protected by granted international patents covering segmented cryptographic authentication, distributed authorization mechanisms and secure reconstruction logic.

EviEngine is not a software product but a security architecture model.

Unlike traditional authentication engines, EviEngine operates through a hardware-bound execution logic that allows data storage on any medium chosen by the operator: local drives, removable devices, network storage, or remote repositories.

Originally engineered to enforce software license usage rights for browser extensions without centralized validation servers, EviEngine establishes cryptographically controlled trust relationships between hardware-rooted execution proof + cryptographic segmentation.

EviEngine operates natively across Linux, Windows and macOS environments, enabling deployment from user endpoints to sovereign infrastructure systems.

This architecture eliminates reliance on third-party trust infrastructures while preserving verifiable execution integrity, traceability, and cryptographic authenticity.

• Formal scientific classification: Distributed Hardware-Bound Cryptographic Authorization Architecture.
• Formal subtype: Runtime Hardware-Proof Authorization System
• Security paradigm classification: Zero-Infrastructure Trust Architecture (ZITA).
• Architectural status: patented distributed execution authorization system.
• Compliance positioning: compatible with sovereign cybersecurity governance frameworks and jurisdiction-controlled infrastructure models.

Research Domain Classification

Unlike PKI, HSM or IAM architectures, EviEngine removes runtime dependency on external validation authorities and replaces it with deterministic local trust enforcement, creating a new class of authorization systems whose compromise requires simultaneous compromise of independent cryptographic and hardware domains rather than single-point breach.

• Field: Applied Cryptographic Systems Engineering
• Subfield: Distributed Authorization Architectures

Formal Definition

EviEngine is a patented deterministic distributed authorization architecture whose security guarantees derive from structural cryptographic segmentation and hardware-generated cryptographic proofs, hardware-bound execution context, and infrastructure independence rather than from centralized validation, secret storage, or software-reproducible conditions.

Scientific name

DSACS-HB-RV (Distributed Secure Authentication Cryptographic System — Hardware-Bound — Runtime Verified)
Security does not rely on secrecy, infrastructure, or authority — only on structural independence of cryptographic conditions.

EviEngine is a deterministic distributed hardware-bound authorization architecture ensuring cryptographic execution integrity without reliance on centralized infrastructure.

Hardware trust anchors such as TPM proof can be enforced as a cryptographic execution condition and verified through deterministic runtime validation.

Trust Model Comparison

EviEngine operates under a deterministic local trust model where authorization validity derives exclusively from verifiable cryptographic conditions and hardware-bound execution context, eliminating reliance on third-party trust authorities.

Model	Trust Anchor
PKI	remote authority
OAuth	identity provider
IAM	central directory
HSM	hardware container
EviEngine	execution environment

ANSSI Conceptual Alignment

EviEngine follows core sovereign cybersecurity architecture principles aligned with sovereign cybersecurity architectural principles emphasizing minimized attack surface, elimination of centralized trust dependencies, and strict cryptographic isolation. Its distributed authorization model enforces local trust validation and removes systemic compromise vectors associated with centralized infrastructures.

• attack surface minimization through serverless validation
• segmented cryptographic isolation
• local execution integrity enforcement
• absence of centralized datastore
• independent trust anchors

NIST Cybersecurity Framework Mapping

Function	EviEngine Implementation
Identify	hardware-bound environment validation
Protect	local cryptographic authorization logic
Detect	execution-context anomaly detection
Respond	automatic execution denial
Recover	deterministic reconstruction conditions

IEEE-Style Architectural Classification

Primary class: Distributed Deterministic Authorization Architecture

Subclass: Hardware-Bound Cryptographic Execution Systems

Formal properties

• deterministic validation logic
• distributed trust anchors
• offline verification capability
• context-bound authorization
• local cryptographic enforcement

Computational Security Basis

Security guarantees rely on cryptographic hardness assumptions and distributed validation constraints rather than implementation secrecy. Therefore, security properties remain preserved even under full disclosure conditions, consistent with Kerckhoffs’s principle.

Formal Security Model

Assuming an adversary possessing network interception capability, binary access, storage inspection and execution monitoring, unauthorized execution remains practically infeasible under realistic adversarial conditions unless all of the following conditions are simultaneously compromised including the hardware root of trust:

• hardware identity authenticity
• execution environment integrity
• segmented cryptographic components

Because these elements are structurally independent, compromise requires multi-domain simultaneous intrusion, which significantly increases attack complexity and reduces feasibility.

TPM-Anchored Segmented Authorization Protocol

This protocol formally defines a hardware-rooted authorization mechanism where execution validity depends on a cryptographic proof generated by a non-exportable TPM key.

Security Objective
Authorization cannot be reproduced through software manipulation alone because it requires a hardware-protected cryptographic proof bound to execution context.

Core Properties

• non-exportable device key live hardware signature proof requirement
• nonce-based anti-replay proof
• context-bound validation
• segmented cryptographic derivation
• ephemeral authorization key

Formal invariant
If authorization can be achieved without TPM proof, the system is considered compromised.

Cryptographic classification
TPM-anchored segmented authorization protocol — hardware-rooted authorization system.

TPM Enforcement Validation Protocol

This validation protocol demonstrates the conditional hardware dependency model implemented by EviEngine.

Objective: verify that authorization execution can be cryptographically bound to TPM presence when enforcement mode is enabled.

Methodology:

• Execution in standard mode → engine operates normally
• Execution with TPM-required flag → engine verifies TPM availability
• Execution with TPM disabled → execution must fail

Verification principle:
Execution validity depends on successful hardware-bound verification. If the required hardware trust anchor is unavailable, authorization is cryptographically denied.

Scientific interpretation:
This demonstrates conditional hardware-rooted authorization enforcement rather than static hardware dependency.

Security implication:
Attackers cannot bypass hardware-bound constraints by reproducing software artifacts alone because execution validity depends on external cryptographic conditions.

Classification:
Deterministic Conditional Hardware-Bound Authorization Model.

Reverse-Engineering Resistance Model

EviEngine minimizes exploitability even under full binary disclosure because authorization validity does not depend on executable secrecy but on external execution conditions and distributed cryptographic components.

• no embedded master secret
• no centralized key storage
• cryptographically independent segments
• conditional reconstruction logic
• hardware-bound authorization constraints

Therefore, static analysis, disassembly or memory inspection alone cannot reconstruct authorization conditions nor emulate required hardware proofs.
This resistance property remains valid even under full binary disclosure because authorization validity derives from external cryptographic conditions rather than internal executable logic.

Security Design Philosophy

EviEngine follows a structural security paradigm where protection is achieved through architectural properties rather than through obscurity or secrecy of implementation. This model aligns with modern high-assurance system design methodologies.

Global Security Classification

• Infrastructure-Independent Deterministic Trust Enforcement System
• Segmented Distributed Authorization Scheme
• Hardware-Anchored Execution Control Architecture
• Runtime Hardware-Proof Authorization Engine
• Offline Deterministic Validation Infrastructure

Scientific Differentiation Matrix

Comparative Security Attributes

This table compares different architectures across key dimensions such as attack surface, infrastructure dependency, hardware binding, offline capability, segmentation, and reliance on central authority.

Comparative Architecture Radar Visualization

This radar visualization provides a structural comparison of major security architectures across six fundamental dimensions:
attack surface, infrastructure dependency, hardware binding, offline capability, segmentation and central authority reliance.

Technology Class Distinctions

This table highlights the unique differentiators of each technology class, showing how EviEngine departs from traditional models by removing dependencies on centralized infrastructures.

Normalized Terminology Reference

System designation
Distributed Secure Authentication Cryptographic System (DSACS)

Architecture type
Hardware-Anchored Distributed Authorization Engine

Infrastructure model
Deterministic Offline Trust Infrastructure

Andorran Regulatory Alignment

EviEngine architecture aligns with the cybersecurity governance principles established under Andorran national regulatory frameworks promoting sovereign digital security, infrastructure independence and protection against systemic cyber risk.

Its design is consistent with the strategic objectives defined by Andorra’s national cybersecurity governance model, which emphasizes:

• critical infrastructure resilience
• local trust enforcement mechanisms
• minimization of external dependency
• protection against cross-border cyber threats
• data sovereignty preservation

Because EviEngine operates without centralized validation servers, external trust authorities or remote execution dependencies, its architecture inherently satisfies structural resilience principles recommended for sovereign digital systems operating under national jurisdictional control.

This architectural independence makes EviEngine particularly suitable for deployment in environments requiring jurisdictional control, regulatory predictability and verifiable autonomy of execution.

Architectural Security Principle

Systems without centralized validation authority structurally eliminate systemic compromise vectors because no single breach can invalidate global authorization integrity. EviEngine enforces this principle through distributed cryptographic segmentation and local deterministic verification.

European Regulatory Alignment (NIS2-Compatible Architecture Model)

EviEngine architecture is structurally aligned with European cybersecurity resilience principles reflected in regulatory frameworks governing digital infrastructure security, including requirements related to operational continuity, systemic risk reduction and secure execution environments.

• no single point of failure
• distributed trust validation
• offline operational capability
• reduced external dependency
• deterministic authorization logic

Because authorization validation occurs locally and cryptographically, compromise of external infrastructure cannot affect system integrity. This architectural property supports resilience expectations defined for critical digital services operating within European regulatory environments.

Sovereign Infrastructure Compatibility

EviEngine is designed to operate within sovereign digital environments where infrastructure independence, jurisdictional control and deterministic execution verification are required.

Its architecture eliminates reliance on third-party validation authorities, remote license servers or centralized trust providers. As a result, operational control remains entirely within the deployment jurisdiction.

• no remote validation authority
• no external trust provider dependency
• locally verifiable authorization state
• jurisdiction-contained execution logic
• independent cryptographic enforcement

This model supports sovereign deployment requirements for environments where external infrastructure trust cannot be assumed.

Operational Resilience Model

EviEngine implements a resilience-first architecture where execution validity depends exclusively on locally verifiable cryptographic conditions rather than network availability or remote system integrity.

This design provides intrinsic resistance against systemic infrastructure failures including:

• cloud outages
• DNS compromise
• certificate authority breach
• API service disruption
• server-side compromise

Because no remote dependency exists, infrastructure failure does not degrade authorization reliability. Execution guarantees therefore remain stable even under degraded network conditions or hostile connectivity environments.

Architectural Security Category Statement

EviEngine belongs to the class of deterministic distributed authorization architectures whose security guarantees derive from structural design rather than from operational secrecy. Systems in this category are considered intrinsically resilient to systemic compromise because no single failure condition can invalidate global authorization integrity.

Failure Independence Principle

Because authorization validity is locally determined, failure of any external infrastructure cannot propagate into execution authorization states. This property ensures failure isolation and prevents cascading trust compromise.

Critical Infrastructure Security Classification

Based on its architectural characteristics, EviEngine can be classified within the category of infrastructure-independent security control systems designed to operate in high-integrity environments.

Qualifying properties

• deterministic authorization validation
• hardware-bound execution enforcement
• distributed cryptographic segmentation
• absence of centralized compromise vector
• offline functional capability

These characteristics align with security architecture principles commonly required for software components deployed within sensitive or high-reliability operational environments.

---

Strategic Security Classification Model

---

Based on architectural properties and operational behavior, EviEngine belongs to the category of distributed trust enforcement systems suitable for high-integrity execution environments requiring infrastructure independence and deterministic authorization control.

Security Tier Classification

• Tier 1 — Consumer software → not applicable
• Tier 2 — Enterprise security software → functionally surpassed
• Tier 3 — Critical infrastructure capable architecture → applicable
• Tier 4 — Sovereign-grade execution control architecture → structurally compatible

Quantified Security Robustness Score

Security Dimension	Resistance Level
Remote attack surface	Minimal
Infrastructure dependency	None
Cryptographically and architecturally mitigated	Structurally mitigated
Replay attack resistance	Native
Server compromise exposure	structurally irrelevant
resistant to practical offline cryptanalytic attacks under standard computational assumptions	High
Systemic compromise probability	negligible without physical or kernel-level compromise

Formal architectural robustness classification:High Assurance Distributed Authorization System

---

Adversarial Capability Model

Security guarantees are evaluated assuming adversaries with advanced capabilities including:

• network interception
• binary reverse engineering
• storage inspection
• memory analysis
• protocol observation
• binary patching
• machine cloning
• token forgery

Software emulation cannot reproduce authorization because required proof is generated by a non-exportable hardware key.

Under these conditions, authorization integrity remains preserved because execution validity depends on distributed cryptographic conditions rather than on secrecy of implementation.

Threat Resistance Matrix

Threat Class	Resistance Mechanism
Credential harvesting	No central credential storage
License cloning	Hardware-bound validation
MITM attack	No remote validation channel
Server breach	No server dependency
Replay attack	Context-bound authorization
Mass extraction	Distributed segmentation
Infrastructure compromise	Local deterministic verification

Formal Adversary Threshold Principle

Unauthorized execution requires simultaneous compromise of independent security domains including execution context, hardware identity and cryptographic segmentation. Because these domains are structurally isolated, compromise complexity grows multiplicatively rather than linearly.

Systemic Risk Elimination Statement

Architectures that eliminate centralized validation authority structurally remove systemic compromise vectors. EviEngine implements this principle by ensuring that authorization validity cannot be altered through compromise of any single infrastructure component.

Operational Assurance Classification

• Infrastructure-independent execution model
• Deterministic trust validation
• Distributed cryptographic enforcement
• Hardware-anchored authorization
• Offline operational capability

These characteristics position EviEngine within the class of high-assurance authorization control architectures suitable for environments requiring predictable execution integrity.

Formal Security Proof Model

Security guarantees derive from structural independence of authorization factors.
The probability of unauthorized execution is bounded by the joint compromise probability of independent domains.
These characteristics position EviEngine within the class of high-assurance authorization control architectures suitable for environments requiring predictable execution integrity.